Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lieberman Hit Over Reluctance to Quiz Clinton Official
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 8/08/02 | Christine Hall

Posted on 08/08/2002 3:22:43 PM PDT by kattracks

(CNSNews.com) - A Republican lawmaker wants former Clinton administration Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin to testify before a Senate committee regarding his failed efforts to get government help in preventing the collapse of energy giant Enron.

Rep. Mark Foley (R-Fla.) also took a rhetorical swipe at Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-Conn.), former Democratic vice presidential nominee and possible 2004 presidential candidate, for his reticence in forcing Rubin's testimony before the Senate this fall.

Foley fired off a letter to Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Harvey Pitt on Thursday urging the SEC to launch its own investigation into Rubin's November 2001 call to Treasury Department official Pete Fisher.

According to a Treasury Dept. spokesperson, the purpose of Rubin's call was to gain Fisher's help in convincing Wall Street credit-reporting agencies to forestall plans to downgrade Enron's credit rating.

Rubin's present employer, Citigroup, was an Enron creditor and thus had an interest in preventing Enron's collapse. Rubin has served as chairman of Citigroup's executive committee for the past three years.

Lieberman, who chairs the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee, has said he plans to hold hearings this fall to examine the relationship between Enron and government officials, but has expressed little interest in questioning former Clinton administration officials.

"There is ... evidence that a bunch of other people at Enron called people like Secretary of the Treasury Paul O'Neill, Secretary of Commerce Don Evans and others in the White House," Lieberman told radio talk show host Don Imus on Aug. 2.

But Lieberman didn't mention Rubin's call and, when asked about it, said, "If we have any reason to believe it will be constructive to call any of these people - Rubin, [Enron Chairman and CEO] Ken Lay, Evans, anybody else - we'll do it."

That didn't sit well with Foley. "If Joe Lieberman won't do his job, I'll do it for him," he said. "He has a responsibility to subpoena Rubin, and he's ignoring that responsibility."

Foley cited "possible wrongdoing" on the part of Citigroup and Rubin as justification for getting Rubin's explanation of events.

"I can only hope he's not doing this to protect his single biggest campaign contributor before possibly running for the presidency," said Foley. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Citigroup has given nearly $60,000 for campaign-related expenses to Lieberman over the past five years.

Leslie Phillips, a spokesperson for Lieberman, said the senator harbors the same level of concern about Enron's contacts with government officials as he does Rubin's.

A spokesman for retiring Sen. Fred Thompson (R-Tenn.), the ranking member of the Senate Government Reform Committee, said that Thompson is not pressuring Lieberman to pursue Rubin.

But Edward H. Fleischman, a former SEC commissioner and current New York University law school professor, said Rubin didn't do anything wrong by making a phone call.

"I always thought that whoever was on the calling end was perfectly, appropriately exercising his or her rights as a ... citizen, businessman or investor," said Fleischman. "Anybody on the outside can call a government official, and it's up to the government official to say that's not a matter that I even want to talk to you about.

"We, as a public, tend to look askance at anybody trying to interfere with...the processes of government," he observed, but "at the same time, we are very jealous of our privilege to lobby.

"If you were to say to me that Mr. Rubin had some kind of obligation to the Treasury Department because his past service still continued," that would be a different matter, Fleischman said.

Still, said Fleischman, the lawyer and Republican in him understands the desire to keep the name of a Democrat and former Clinton official in the news.

"I'm a lawyer, right? I'm a hired gun," he quipped. "If you want me to try to figure out some way, since I'm a Republican, too, in which you can put Mr. Rubin on the hot seat, that's a different question."

E-mail a news tip to Christine Hall.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.




TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 08/08/2002 3:22:43 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
personally, it really does not matter what the senate subcommittee does or not do. they have no power to prosecute. lieberman is doing all he can to make this a political show and the tables have turned on him. he is not, repeat, is not, going to cooperate and call rubin. it is simply too embarrassing for the socialists.

foley has the right idea. get those who can actually file charges to do the investigation. i suspect that the bush administration has an investigation going on as we speak.

2 posted on 08/08/2002 3:32:11 PM PDT by mlocher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
If they do call Rubin, the democrats will probably ask questions like what did you have for lunch today, and how's your wife and children. They wouldn't want to ask any questions that might be hard to explain or incriminating.
3 posted on 08/08/2002 3:36:40 PM PDT by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"A spokesman for retiring Sen. Fred Thompson (R-Tenn.), the ranking member of the Senate Government Reform Committee, said that Thompson is not pressuring Lieberman to pursue Rubin."

The sooner this man is gone the better...what a tremendous disappointment Tompson has been..surrendered to Glenn on the Chicom hearings and now this....

4 posted on 08/08/2002 4:06:03 PM PDT by drc43
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drc43
Are there any two more totally useless Republican Senators that Thompson & Trent Lott?

DEMOCRAT VOTERS

5 posted on 08/08/2002 4:14:56 PM PDT by stlrocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mlocher
I think you are right on both points you made.
Maybe I missed this somewhere but doesn't the House have at least one committee investigating Enron? If so, why don't they call Rubin?
6 posted on 08/08/2002 4:31:12 PM PDT by dixiechick2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; leadpenny
"I'm a lawyer, right? I'm a hired gun," he quipped. "If you want me to try to figure out some way, since I'm a Republican, too, in which you can put Mr. Rubin on the hot seat, that's a different question."

Somebody please ask Mr. Fleischman THAT question.

7 posted on 08/08/2002 4:42:41 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drc43
The sooner this man is gone the better...what a tremendous disappointment Tompson has been..surrendered to Glenn on the Chicom hearings and now this....

4 posted on 8/8/02 4:06 PM Pacific by drc43

Well he is an actor.... And he played a Republican part-time!

8 posted on 08/08/2002 5:03:06 PM PDT by Area51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"If Joe Lieberman won't do his job, I'll do it for him," he said. "He has a responsibility to subpoena Rubin, and he's ignoring that responsibility."

Wow!!! A Republican with balls! Here I was thinking that Newt was the last keeper of the Repulican gonads and that they were lost when he left town. It's a genuine miracle!!!

9 posted on 08/08/2002 5:33:54 PM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Where is our institutional memory? Does anyone remember how the clintons got away with whitewater? In particular, does anyone remember or care that it is because they got away with pulling strings to keep Madison Guaranty Savings and Loan afloat after it was insolvent which cost the taxpayers some 60 million, that we have this kind of thing today? Fiske, Starr and congress let them get away with contributing to the savings and loan debacle and now we have this.
10 posted on 08/08/2002 5:39:26 PM PDT by Samizdat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I just love it when the Libs plans backfire on them.
11 posted on 08/08/2002 5:44:20 PM PDT by Rev. Lou Chenary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stlrocket
I had such great expectations from both these men. Disappointing doesn't quite sum it up. Lott is a wimp. Thompson could have been a commanding presence but folded. One wonders if the Hildebeast has some really awful "stuff' on him in those FBI folders.
12 posted on 08/08/2002 5:54:00 PM PDT by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stlrocket
"Are there any two more totally useless Republican Senators that Thompson & Trent Lott?"

SURE! My senator, John Warner (r-va) for one. There are a lot of second choices. Try Hatch as an example.

13 posted on 08/08/2002 5:59:32 PM PDT by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Samizdat
HELLOOO. You are correct. What we now have is nothing more than Madison Guaranty on a Grand Scale. And why WOULDN'T they have tried it again. Hell it worked so well the first time around. Madison was nothing more than a learning ground for them. I don't know who I despise more, the clintons, their entire administration, or the republicans who let them get away with it.
14 posted on 08/08/2002 6:00:42 PM PDT by small voice in the wilderness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Lieberman Hit

Lieberman Hit

Lieberman Hit

Lieberman Hit

...

I just like the way this looks...the words also flow so nicely....

15 posted on 08/08/2002 6:02:05 PM PDT by Itzlzha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I wish they would also call up Alan Greenspan. Rumor (which I cannot substantiate) has it that he secured permission when he took the job of Fed Chairman to manage his own investments. Currently, and for some time, his investments have all been in T bills.

IMHO for the last three years we have been in a deflation. For the last ten years or so the dollar has appreciated by 40%. The short term rates on T bills in this country should have been 1%. Remember, we have 100% security, world's best military and a stable, growing economy.

High US interest rates and demands for capital to meet balance of payment problems have resulted in Brazil, Argentina and Mexico all being pressed to the wall.

16 posted on 08/08/2002 6:14:03 PM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000
Maybe I missed this somewhere but doesn't the House have at least one committee investigating Enron? If so, why don't they call Rubin?

yes, the house has a committee investigating enron. i am not sure why rubin has not yet been called by the house committee. i suppose there is some fear of being called 'a politiker' by the democrats if there is nothing there. could also be fear -- "if you call rubin we are going to expose this about your team..."

17 posted on 08/08/2002 7:28:27 PM PDT by mlocher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mlocher
Thanks for your response. Yes, the dims could call it a "political witch hunt", I guess. That's a shame.

"...ould also be fear..."

Well, that's a given. ;o)

18 posted on 08/08/2002 7:49:26 PM PDT by dixiechick2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson