Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was Patriarchy a Women's Scheme to Control Men?
self | 10/30/2002 | SauronOfMordor

Posted on 10/30/2002 6:58:08 AM PST by SauronOfMordor

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 561-567 next last
To: SauronOfMordor
In the long term, economic affluence is not as relevent as survival is. In that context, traditional Islam may turn out to be the superior ideology by the only criterion that matters: they will be the ones that are left

Same thing is happening in the US, at least in Texas and the Southwest. Through massive immigration and marginally higher birthrates, Central and South Americans are becoming the "ones who are left."

141 posted on 10/31/2002 11:54:49 AM PST by Semaphore Heathcliffe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #142 Removed by Moderator

To: GirlNextDoor
" I also believe that foundation was intended in the original patriarchal system."

At one time I was putting together a weekend seminar called "Foundations for Living, Foundations for Life." I had lots of support from women, but I wonder how many men would have come.

143 posted on 10/31/2002 12:07:25 PM PST by bcoffey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: GirlNextDoor
Hello Girl, it takes some weakening of that grasp in order for another group to grab a footing.

I don't have a lot of time to give this deep thought, so I'll pose a question to you instead. (borrow your brain?)

Could this have all started when women were given (and took) the right to vote?

bank ; )

144 posted on 10/31/2002 12:09:16 PM PST by bankwalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
In modern war economic superiority should be decisive excess numbers should just increase the numbers of useless mouths. The numbers problem is only relevant because of political correctness and the Democratic system itself. If the USA were a right wing monarchy free from political correctness superior numbers wouldn't save them.
145 posted on 10/31/2002 12:09:17 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bcoffey
Why should me come: Non religious based relationship seminars include: "If women ran the world there would be no wars." "If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament." (wrong birthing would become the next macho contest.) "Men are threatened by a woman who <>"
146 posted on 10/31/2002 12:20:52 PM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
ummm... you lost me.
147 posted on 10/31/2002 12:22:58 PM PST by bcoffey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
I don't know about patriarchies or matriarchies. I just know that both parents are essential for kids to flourish.
148 posted on 10/31/2002 12:33:51 PM PST by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GirlNextDoor
I think both your replies carry the view that it was a combination of the women pressuring for more and the men willing to trade some of their power .Or did I read something into them?

Men are not used to fighting women. When a woman screams and demands to have her way, most guys tend to let her, in order to keep the peace. This worked when men and women were mostly on better terms with each other.

What changed? One contributing factor is more women attending college classes taught by radical Marxists, and buying into the "We is oppressed" mentality.

149 posted on 10/31/2002 12:34:55 PM PST by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Dutch-Comfort
With our two income households, we are really not so different than we used to be, except that now we neglect our children far more.

We had a simple solution. Rather than deciding on a mandated standard of living, and deciding that the only way to do it is to have two incomes, we decided she would stay home with the kids and our standard of living would be determined by what I made as the sole income.

Driving a 10-year-old Nissan instead of a new Lexus is not a big sacrifice for me.

150 posted on 10/31/2002 12:40:43 PM PST by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
You're attending the wrong seminars.
Or allowing someone else to define "non religious based relationship seminars."
151 posted on 10/31/2002 1:04:03 PM PST by hocndoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

Comment #152 Removed by Moderator

To: Desdemona
...but most guys don't want to be with a woman who's smarter and richer than they are. You can say that again. Try playing Trivial Pursuit with a guy who isn't a bookworm. It's very painful for them. They don't want a woman who's better at their profession, either (which is why I'm looking outside of mine). They also don't want someone who's interests don't fit into a neat little box. When a guy I knew called my interests hi-felutant (sp), not that I was really interested, I wrote him off.

Seriously, You DEFINITELY are really looking in all the wrong places.

The men I meet, think it is grand that I have such varied interests, intellect, that I am successful, I know how to invest, Im involved in conservative politics, that I can handle guns, and can hunt and fish, etc. it turns them on. Most of the men I meet, not only would want a successful woman, but love women whos interests do NOT!!! "fit into a neat little box. "

The only men I know who "don't want a woman who's better at their profession" are the incompetent ones, the ones who are good at their professions, really admire a woman who is also good. So who cares about the insecure and incompetent workers?

The best calf-puller in Loop county Nebraska is a very feminine woman(when she is not calf-pulling), and she is so popular, with the men, because of her skills. I also know some very talented computer professional women, who attract good men like honey. It is such a treat for good men to find women who are competent and knowedgable at many things.

Sounds like maybe you are meeting men/losers in bars? or what? You need to find some intelligent and secure men.

153 posted on 10/31/2002 2:32:50 PM PST by waterstraat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: waterstraat
Sounds like maybe you are meeting men/losers in bars? or what? You need to find some intelligent and secure men.

No, computer geek I met work. We had a couple things in common - we're both of the same faith and both baseball fans.

I don't go to bars often. I did get hit on a number of times the last time I went, but...no. Just...no.

I live in St. Louis. (A city that's somewhat been forgotten. And neglected.) I'm a lyric soprano - classically trained (and I sing a lot) - and I like high art. That was the big thing. Around here it's not just men, but a lot of women, too. I mean the grief I get because I won't cut my hair short and actually can name opera singers other than the three tenors....

I'd rather go to the opera or the symphony (although, now that I'm in the chorus...) than go line dancing. It's just not my thing. I belong to the cultural institutions here, which are really world class. I like to go to museums. Jane Austen is my favorite author.

But I still am a baseball and hockey fan. There's nothing like a good hockey fight. I listen to rock in the car (to keep myself from burning out) and jazz when I get the chance. I'd like to travel more often than I can. I don't like beer, but a nice dry white....mmmm.

Sometimes guys just don't understand....
154 posted on 10/31/2002 2:58:27 PM PST by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: bankwalker
Could this have all started when women were given (and took) the right to vote?

Pardon me, but if you know anything about history, that is such a stupid thing to say.

The fact is, that the time period when "men-only" had the right to vote was extremely short in all of human history. There was not even one lifetime, 1789-1859, that "some" men and no women could vote. There was never any long period of time in America when men could vote and women could not.

The system of only men voting was only from 1789 to the 1850's, when the first states gave women the right to vote. Furthermore, in 1789, and into the early 1800's, only a few men, white property owners, etc, had the right to vote, but not most men. By the time when most men did have the right to vote, in the middle 1800's, quite a few states, were already started granting the vote to women, Kansas, Utah, Wyoming, etc.

155 posted on 10/31/2002 3:00:02 PM PST by waterstraat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor; whomever
SoM, thanks for posting this essay. One of the more insightful, thought-provoking articles we've had here in a long time. The thread has me thinking a million different directions at once, so I'll post blurbs when I can.

The firefighter-awareness that swept the nation after 911 was, in all it's grim earnestness, a darkly comic display of the media's realization that, "hey, there are some men under these rocks over here. Have they been here the whole time?" Manly men who like to hang with other men, shooting the breeze, until it's time to put on some heavy protective clothing, ride on a loud fast vehicle to a dangerous situation. Who carry people out of fires and smash down doors with heavy axes. (not necessarily in that order) It was a national swoonfest, "funny" for the fact that it stopped short of stating the glaringly obvious: That this is generally what men are like by nature. The guys who do these jobs now are the exception, rather than the rule, in cities, because cities run more smoothly when everybody goes along to get along. Not exactly the ideal environment for Joe Average Male.

As our society has evolved from agrarian -> industrial -> information-based, the traditional heavy-lifting roles are disappearing rapidly. We are becoming increasingly urbanized, in which environment the traditional gender roles are made almost irrelevant. This environment is the perfect breeding ground for radical feminism, because in this latest paradigm, men really don't matter so much. Men and women can both stand at a cash register, both operate a computer, and both be bureaucrats. In cities the typical male characteristics of self-sufficiency and personal responsibility for family and property are sublimated by reliance on police, pool cleaners, jobs to pay for it all. The qualities that most distinctly define human males as a group are made redundant or irrelevant. Women are freed from their tradional roles of kid-bearer and raiser, housekeeper. They can willfully abandon that natural fit, while men are made to sit in an ill-fitting "Woman" costume and told to be quiet about the discomfort.
156 posted on 10/31/2002 3:02:46 PM PST by Semaphore Heathcliffe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
I'm a lyric soprano - classically trained (and I sing a lot) - and I like high art. That was the big thing. Around here it's not just men, but a lot of women, too. I mean the grief I get because I won't cut my hair short and actually can name opera singers other than the three tenors.... I'd rather go to the opera or the symphony (although, now that I'm in the chorus...) than go line dancing. It's just not my thing. I belong to the cultural institutions here, which are really world class. I like to go to museums. Jane Austen is my favorite author. But I still am a baseball and hockey fan. There's nothing like a good hockey fight. I listen to rock in the car (to keep myself from burning out) and jazz when I get the chance. I'd like to travel more often than I can. I don't like beer, but a nice dry white....mmmm.

Hmmm, I never thought Missouri was much into hockey, none of my relatives there like it. Go to Canada if you want to find men that like hockey.

Well, anyways, you sound great, and a fine catch for a thinking man who is himself secure( although I dont know how you appearance is).

For one thing, do not cut your hair short, it is your crown of glory, and most men I know love women with long hair. It will also keep you looking young, since so few women over 45 have long hair, and almost none over 50.

Too bad about line dancing, because most men do not like to dance, and only dance to pick up women, to the dismay of many a housewife. On the other hand, Country men, those who go to country bars, will dance until their teeth fall out and one foot is in the grave. If you can learn to like country, you will be able to dance your life away.

The trick is, to find an intellectual and cultured man, who likes country, as well as symphonies. There are some, and when you do find him, he will like you.

It is much harder to find men who like opera unless they know the language, and thus can understand it. Almost no man likes opera if he cant understand what they are singing, but then again, you dont have to share "all" your interests.

157 posted on 10/31/2002 3:18:10 PM PST by waterstraat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
I was also going to say that at shooting ranges, you are much more likely to find old-style gentlemen, in my experience

I can vouch for that! ..and the men love the women that go there.

158 posted on 10/31/2002 3:21:17 PM PST by waterstraat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: sonserae
Yes...and HE asked me for coffee. When I arrived, I was on time. He had already bought coffee for himself...so I stood in line and bought my own and he didn't offer. Believe me, I have a whole list of stories like this.

My , My, what on earth were you thinking?

Why would YOU?? stand in line for coffee? I would never have done that, never would have went in line, nor would I have bought my own coffee. Why did you not just sit down and tell him outright that you were thristy( if he did not offer to go get you some right away)? Why didnt you just come out and ask him if he was going to buy you coffee or not?

Clearly, you were not posturing, or presenting, yourself as a lady, who demands to be treated as one. YOu must present yourself as one who is to be catered to, to be waited on.

If he will not get you a coffee on your first date, just how do you think he will treat you after 10 years of marraige? You have to get started on the right foot, from the getgo, with each man you meet.

Also, even if you are carrying your own handgun, you should still have expected an escort to your car.

This guy was a total loser, and you did nothing to help him learn how to correctly treat women. Good riddance to that guy, but you must learn how to make men treat you the way you want.

159 posted on 10/31/2002 3:33:16 PM PST by waterstraat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: waterstraat
"You must present yourself as one who is to be catered to, to be waited on. "

I must strongly disagree.

Anytime a person misrepresents his or her true self they are sowing the seeds of trouble down the road. Contrary to your statement "you must learn how to make men treat you the way you want" you cannot make someone to be anything.

True change comes from deep within, not from being imposed from without.

160 posted on 10/31/2002 3:42:55 PM PST by bcoffey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 561-567 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson