Posted on 11/15/2002 10:15:09 AM PST by correctthought
I'm a .25 caliber pistola so-called Saturday Night Specialmade by defunct gun maker Raven Arms. Although I'm an inanimate object, I've been found legally culpable in the 2000 classroom shooting of a West Palm Beach, Florida school teacher.
More specifically, a jury has just found gun distributor Valor 5 percent guilty in the tragic murder, which occurred when a 16-year-old student stole an unloaded version of me and some bullets from a family friend and then killed his teacher. The local school board and the family friendthough not the actual shootershouldered the rest of the blame. In the first trial in which a gun company has in any way been held responsible for a murder, Valor is supposed to pay $1.2 million to the victim's widow. The school board is supposed to pay $10.8 million and the family friend $12 million.
The plaintiff's lawyer was Bob Montgomery, best known for representing Florida in its $11.3 billion victory over tobacco companies. The case charged that I was "unsafe, defective and lacked features that would have prevented a minor from using it." Valor's attorneys countered that I wasn't a piece of "junk" and that I had legitimate uses, including self-defense, which is how most guns get used.
All the defendants are appealing the verdict which, given the way municipal cases against gun makers have fared, is likely to be overturned. As the legal battle in Florida moves into the next round, it's worth asking how far we really want to travel down the product-liability road when it comes to gunsand many other things.
Now THAT was funny...
VPG
How about a similar tale "I am Brazzille's trigger finger"?
That would be the Animism that animates the Democrat party!
I fail to see what relevance this has to the price of tea in China or to this case. The victim is also just as dead as if they'd had their head caved in with a brick or gotten run over in the parking lot with the perp's car.
The point here is that the responsibility lies not with the manufacturer of the (admittedly POS) gun, not with the caliber of the gun used, or brand name, but solely with the bottom feeding little bastard that pulled the trigger.
VPG
I fail to see what relevance this has to the price of tea in China or to this case. The victim is also just as dead as if they'd had their head caved in with a brick or gotten run over in the parking lot with the perp's car.
The point here is that the responsibility lies not with the manufacturer of the (admittedly POS) gun, not with the caliber of the gun used, or brand name, but solely with the bottom feeding little bastard that pulled the trigger.
Actually, based on the post from Kenton, they had a better chance with the POS than with the Casull -- the mfg should be given an award for making a gun so bad that the target had at least a sporting chance.
And NOT with the owner of the gun who was merely the victim of a crime and CERTAINLY NOT with the tax payers of the School District who failed to keep a student from carrying the stolen weapon to school.
Sort of gives a new meaning to the old west phrase "Fill your hand with Irony, you scalawag!"
Somehow, though, I can't quite picture Rooster Cogburn saying that with a straight face...
One day he informed his routes that this service trip would be his last. Reason? He was successfully sued for making a knife TOO SHARP! Only a couple hundred bucks as I recall, but as he was retired and did this for extra bucks only, he stopped it all. People bitched about not having his services for years after.
Nam Vet
Go to any committee meeting, anywhere, and you'll understand. In Canada, the defendant in most criminal cases has the option of a jury trial or trial by judge alone. The standard advice from lawyers is that if the facts are against you, go with a jury trial, but if the evidence is in your favour go with a judge. Trust me, it is far easier to con a group of people than an individual. Remember that line from Men in Black- "A person is smart. People are dumb, ignorant and prejudiced."
I don't have a reference for it but I remember a famous experiment to study the "groupthink" phenomenon. Ten "subjects", actually nine participants and one subject, were asked to count the number of items shown on the wall. The nine fake "subjects" were instructed to give the wrong answer, and in nearly every case the actual subject ended up agreeing with the incorrect answer.
Hey, Luv...this is, after all, FLORIDA...and West Palm Beach at that!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.