I fail to see what relevance this has to the price of tea in China or to this case. The victim is also just as dead as if they'd had their head caved in with a brick or gotten run over in the parking lot with the perp's car.
The point here is that the responsibility lies not with the manufacturer of the (admittedly POS) gun, not with the caliber of the gun used, or brand name, but solely with the bottom feeding little bastard that pulled the trigger.
VPG
I fail to see what relevance this has to the price of tea in China or to this case. The victim is also just as dead as if they'd had their head caved in with a brick or gotten run over in the parking lot with the perp's car.
The point here is that the responsibility lies not with the manufacturer of the (admittedly POS) gun, not with the caliber of the gun used, or brand name, but solely with the bottom feeding little bastard that pulled the trigger.
Actually, based on the post from Kenton, they had a better chance with the POS than with the Casull -- the mfg should be given an award for making a gun so bad that the target had at least a sporting chance.
And NOT with the owner of the gun who was merely the victim of a crime and CERTAINLY NOT with the tax payers of the School District who failed to keep a student from carrying the stolen weapon to school.
My post had total relevance to the (irrelevant) one-liner to which I replied. Here we have the story of a lowlife punk who killed a teacher, and some slimy, liberal morons who sued the gun manufacturer, and all this guy can say is, in effect, "what a puny excuse for a gun." I thought it deserved a reply. So, shoot me.
But don't make the mistake of assuming I'm any less pro-Second Amendment than you. The chances of that are extremely slim.