Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton says he had a plan to attack North Korean reactor in 1994 (REVISIONIST HISTORY ALERT)
AP via Yahoo ^ | December 15, 2002 | Toby Sterling

Posted on 12/15/2002 3:19:04 PM PST by snopercod

ROTTERDAM, Netherlands - Former U.S. President Bill Clinton said Sunday he had warned North Korea (news - web sites) in 1994 the United States would destroy its nuclear reactor unless it agreed to freeze its operations.

Now that Pyongyang has said it was reactivating its facilities, Clinton said the North Koreans must be persuaded or forced to stop the weapons program.

"Make no mistake about it, it has to be ended," Clinton said. "You do not want North Korea making bombs and selling them to the highest bidder."

Speaking at a dinner for Dutch businessmen and public figures, the former president said it was more likely North Korean would use the nuclear issue to bargain for more aid, rather than put weapons on the market.

"We had a tense situation with North Korea in my first term," Clinton said. Pyongyang "was planning six to eight" bombs a year.

"We drew up plans to destroy the reactor," Clinton said, and he told Pyongyang the facility would be attacked unless it were frozen.

Clinton urged his successor, George W. Bush, to work with China, Japan and other nations to pressure the North Koreans on the nuclear issue.

The White House said Friday Bush intended to stick with a diplomatic approach to the crisis, and ruled out military action to shut the reactor.

Under the 1994 deal with the Clinton administration, North Korea froze its nuclear program in return for a promise of two safer light-water reactors. It also received a guarantee of 500,000 tons of heavy oil annually until the reactors are built.

Washington halted the oil shipments after U.S. officials said in October that the communist country had acknowledged having a uranium enrichment program to build atomic weapons.

North Korea said last week it will resume operation and construction of its reactors. It said it considered the agreement dead because of delays in the delivery of the reactors, initially planned to be completed by 2003. U.S. officials anticipate at least five years of delay.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Yeah, he wanted to bomb the crap out of them, but instead he sent them $5 billion of food and fuel oil.

Clinton is starting to sound a lot like Robert McNamara...

1 posted on 12/15/2002 3:19:04 PM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: snopercod
B$ alert ... but then that should be a given with a Klinton thread.
2 posted on 12/15/2002 3:20:07 PM PST by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Clinto needs to be a saloon so that he can regale his customers with stories about what a tough guy he was when he was President.
3 posted on 12/15/2002 3:25:25 PM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod; All
Wonder if he knows just how much info about this is out in the public domain, free for the asking?

-The Atomic Genie- what we know about North Korea's Nuclear program--

-Bush and Clinton and 911- some facts... --

4 posted on 12/15/2002 3:25:49 PM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender
be = buy
5 posted on 12/15/2002 3:28:09 PM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Right on. That's what used to be so great about FreeRepublic. We were an archive of political comment, and could hold their feet to the fire when they tried to revise history.
E D I T O R I A L S Extortion, North Korea-Style Date: 9/20/99

When the White House announced it was easing trade sanctions against North Korea Friday, it reminded us of a shopkeeper paying protection money to some Mob enforcer. The problem with such extortion payoffs is that they never end.

The U.S. has maintained a trade embargo on North Korea the last five decades. The embargo has been the principle tool of U.S. foreign policy since the end of the Korean War in 1953. By isolating the communist government, the U.S. made clear that North Korea's adventurism on the world stage had real economic consequences.

Even so, North Korea has been a bad actor. Like every other communist regime, it has deprived its people so it can build an army and weapons; North Koreans are starving because of leader Kim Jong Il's delusions of greatness.

These delusions have had disturbing consequences. North Korea has long sought to join the ranks of nations with nuclear weapons. U.S. intelligence agencies have discerned several sites where North Korea could make them.

North Korea is already a member of the ballistic missile club, having launched a missile across the bows of Japan last year. Most recently, it threatened to test-launch a missile with the range to hit Alaska.

The administration reaction to all these aggressive acts? Payola.

In 1994, after it seemed North Korea was ramping up its weapons research and development, the U.S. brokered a deal between North Korea and South Korea, Japan and the U.S. Under the $6 billion deal, the allies agreed to provide economic assistance and to build nuclear energy plants if North Korea ceased its nuclear weapons program.

It took less than four years for North Korea to start working on its weapons program again. In addition to nuclear warheads, the communist regime was improving its missile capability. And by the way, it was selling those missiles to Iran and Iraq.

The U.S. did everything it could to ensure that the aid package was still intact.

Now the U.S. says because the North Koreans pledged not to test-launch their new longer-range missile, we'll reward them by easing our trade sanctions. This latest accord doesn't even exact a promise to stop building, deploying or selling missiles - just that North Korea won't test its missile.

The U.S. and South Korea once condemned the North Koreans for their threats on missile testing. The two nations also said they would slow down the delivery of economic aid if the missile was launched.

That approach strikes us as more reasonable. As with all communist countries, North Korea needs Western help more than the West needs its markets. A cutoff of aid would seem to be more than enough of a prod to North Korea.

But the U.S. sweetened the deal in an agreement signed in Berlin. Under the accord, consumer goods can be sold to North Korea. Plus, funds can go back and forth between the U.S. and North Korea, as well as people and cargo.

Only goods that have no military use can be sold there. But what's left for the U.S. to bargain with? Exports of military goods and technology? Or perhaps the White House will encourage North Korean scientists to visit our national laboratories to see our nuclear weapons programs, just as it did with China. Of course, we can always pony up some more cash.

Congress may have something to say about Clinton's move to ease sanctions. The chairman of the House International Relations Committee, Rep. Benjamin Gilman, R-N.Y., issued this statement Friday blasting the move:

''If this decision is based on the Berlin Agreement, then it is premature. . . . The Berlin Agreement is far from comprehensive, and the lack of transparency regarding the North Korean missile program and our inability to verify their compliance are troubling issues. Ultimately, we have no assurances that North Korea has halted missile development or its program for weapons of mass destruction.''

Precisely. Given North Korea's pattern of threats and extortion, there is nothing to stop it from coming back to the West in the near future with more threats and more demands for aid.

A shopkeeper under the thumb of Mob ''protection'' has two options: keep paying or go to the police. As the world's only superpower, the U.S. has the power of the police. We should use it, not keep paying.


(C) Copyright 1999 Investors Business Daily, Inc.

6 posted on 12/15/2002 3:28:56 PM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender
I've actually seen beelzebubba up close, and come to think of it, he did look like a saloon.
7 posted on 12/15/2002 3:31:31 PM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
his plan...monica attacks bill at his weakest point...
8 posted on 12/15/2002 3:32:27 PM PST by Bill Davis FR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
How many Black Ninja's did THIS one involve?
9 posted on 12/15/2002 3:36:48 PM PST by Wondervixen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Clinton says he had a plan to attack North Korean reactor in 1994 (REVISIONIST HISTORY ALERT)

I'd guess this is the result of some LSD flashback.

Except that Clinton (like his "wife") is a proven congenital liar.

(thanks to columnist William Safire for finding the right words...)
10 posted on 12/15/2002 3:39:57 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
THe delusional Mr. Clinton. The walking talking example of President Lincoln's axiom: "Better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt".
11 posted on 12/15/2002 3:41:08 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Parse the statement. The last hold-out from the Reagan-Bush era snuck a "plan" onto Klintoon's desk before he was Akancided. Klintoon promptly used the "plan" to cleanup his, ahem, office piggery.

Thus, he had a "plan" in his hand.
12 posted on 12/15/2002 4:17:39 PM PST by evolved_rage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Former U.S. President Bill Clinton said Sunday he had warned North Korea in 1994 the United States would destroy its nuclear reactor unless it agreed to freeze its operations.

He then invited members of the press corps to "go ahead, punch my gut!" in an apparent attempt to demonstrate his physical fitness.

Clinton went on to point out that then North Korean President Kim Il-Sung declined an invitation to a personal duel "mano a mano", and that, during a secret meeting in 1994, he "drank ole' Kim under the table".

Mr. Clinton closed his remarks with a poetic reading, whose authorship he attributed to himself:


13 posted on 12/15/2002 4:19:45 PM PST by Imal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
When the klintoon liebrary opens, there will be papers there that prove his statement...although the ink will still be wet and the document will have a stain.

FMCDH

14 posted on 12/15/2002 4:22:34 PM PST by nothingnew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Clinton says he had a plan to attack North Korean reactor in 1994 (REVISIONIST HISTORY ALERT)

bumping for publicity...
and to ask if this story is evidence that Clinton was doing heavy hallucinogens
in 1994, now, or all the time.....
15 posted on 12/15/2002 4:24:49 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
He thinks he is Kennedy - except revisionism as to "what Kennedy would have done" is at least palatable and even sometimed believable since the man died so soon and probably did have many plans that he never had a chance to act on. Klinton, however, was in office for 8 years and has no excuse for not getting done whatever it is he wanted to do - especially on the international front since his hand was free in that arena and did not depend on congressional support.


16 posted on 12/15/2002 4:35:32 PM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
...and at least the Kennedy revisionism is done by others !!!! Klinton is a joke.
17 posted on 12/15/2002 4:36:43 PM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
This is easy to debunk. An enterprising reporter simply needs to ask the Joint Chiefs of Staff under Clinton whether there was a plan to take out those reactors in N. Korea. Of course, that would be a reporter who was extremely right wing and not in the DNC's pocket.
18 posted on 12/15/2002 4:42:56 PM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
If he's not on an apology tour he's on a damned lies tour.
19 posted on 12/15/2002 4:45:53 PM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Gee, I thought Mr. Nobel Peace Prize himself went there and said if you ratch it down we will give you what you want, just cool it. I didn't think clinton would take on the N Koreans, wow, I underestimated his hawk tendencies.
20 posted on 12/15/2002 4:58:26 PM PST by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson