Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN's Ritter faced sex rap
New York Daily News ^ | 1/19/03 | Joe Mahoney

Posted on 01/19/2003 1:15:49 AM PST by kattracks

ALBANY - Former UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter was secretly prosecuted in Albany County in 2001 after he was snared in an Internet sex sting operation, law enforcement sources told the Daily News.

Ritter, who lives in the Albany suburb of Delmar, is now a high-profile critic of President Bush's war preparations.

He was arrested by Colonie Police in June 2001 on a misdemeanor charge after he allegedly had a sexual discussion on the Internet with an undercover investigator he thought was an underage girl, law enforcement sources disclosed on condition of anonymity.

The case was sealed, and Colonie officials declined to release the arrest records, explaining the matter was adjourned in local court in contemplation of dismissal.

The Schenectady Daily Gazette reported yesterday that Albany District Attorney Paul Clyne fired veteran Assistant District Attorney Cynthia Preiser last week for failing to inform him of the case against Ritter.

Clyne said that as a "sensitive" case, it should have been brought to his attention.

Ritter, who has made frequent appearances on network television after speaking to the Iraq National Assembly last year, could not be reached for comment.

Joe Mahoney



TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: napalminthemorning; pedophile; scottritter; treason; un; weaponsinspector; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 601-617 next last
To: Miss Marple
"Furthermore, it would be interesting to know if there is ANOTHER charge elsewhere......"

No tin foil hat needed here.

Rarely is a criminal caught for his/her first criminal act.

You can bet the farm Ritter has a background of this behavior in his past.

Now.....who will be the news organization to obtain and release this information?

61 posted on 01/19/2003 5:06:32 AM PST by G.Mason (Little man so spic & span....where were you when the $h!t hit the fan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
<< I like logic problems. >>

And you're good at them. :-)
62 posted on 01/19/2003 5:07:04 AM PST by Nita Nuprez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Here's a pretty good timeline of his turnabout, from The Weekly Standard:

Saddam Hussein's American Apologist
From the November 19, 2001 issue: The strange career of former U.N. arms inspector Scott Ritter.
by Stephen F. Hayes
11/19/2001, Volume 007, Issue 10 [snip]


The part about admiring and greeting is literal. Ritter was welcomed back to Baghdad in July 2000, with the blessing of Saddam Hussein. The reason for his trip? To produce a documentary film, "In Shifting Sands," that would chronicle the weapons-inspection process and, he says, "de-demonize" Iraq. The 90-minute film, which he says he is close to selling to a broadcast outlet, was produced with the approval of the Iraqi government and features interviews with numerous high-level Iraqi officials, including Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz.

U.S. intelligence officials and arms control advocates say Ritter has been played--perhaps unwittingly--by Saddam Hussein. "If you're Scott Ritter," says one arms expert, "the former 'cowboy' weapons inspector, kicked out by Saddam Hussein, you're not going to get back into Iraq unless Saddam Hussein invites you and wants you there."

[SNIP]

All inspections stopped in December 1998. That same month, in an article written for the New Republic, Ritter again warned of the continuing Iraqi threat, this time in much greater detail. "Even today, Iraq is not nearly disarmed," he maintained. "Based on highly credible intelligence, UNSCOM [the U.N. weapons inspectors] suspects that Iraq still has biological agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, and clostridium perfringens in sufficient quantity to fill several dozen bombs and ballistic missile warheads, as well as the means to continue manufacturing these deadly agents. Iraq probably retains several tons of the highly toxic VX substance, as well as sarin nerve gas and mustard gas. This agent is stored in artillery shells, bombs, and ballistic missile warheads. And Iraq retains significant dual-use industrial infrastructure that can be used to rapidly reconstitute large-scale chemical weapons production."

[SNIP]

SO IT WAS, and is. But Ritter now utterly contradicts his testimony of 1998, according to which Saddam Hussein could have reconstituted a fearsome arsenal of weapons of mass destruction by the middle of 1999. By that time, in a June 1999 interview with leaders of the Fellowship of Reconciliation, a peace organization based in Nyack, New York, he had changed his tune. "When you ask the question [does] Iraq possess militarily viable biological or chemical weapons? The answer is 'no.' It is a resounding NO! Can Iraq produce today chemical weapons on a meaningful scale? No! Can Iraq produce biological weapons on a meaningful scale? No! Ballistic missiles? No. It is 'no' across the board. So from a qualitative standpoint, Iraq has been disarmed. Iraq today possesses no meaningful weapons of mass destruction capability."

63 posted on 01/19/2003 5:08:04 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
If the assistant DA did it at directions of someone other than the DA, that would indicate reasons for her dismissal. WHO did this? (A certain junior New Yorok senator comes to mind, but heck, that may just be my tin foil tendencies.)

It may be the Reynolds talking. Someone reminded me a few days ago that when Ritter testified before the Senate committee, he spend some time criticizing the Clinton adminstration Middle East policies & Maddie Albright, prompting Joe Biden to tell Ritter that he was talking above his pay grade. He detested that administration and he detests this one.

But not only do I want to know a whole lot more about this story--if there were other charges in other jurisdictions, for example (and maybe that he's being blackmailed)--but if others in the internet sex ring were treated similarly (if some or all they received secret prosecutions, for example, or was it just Scott that received special treatment). I want to know why this was covered up. I want to know who his lawyer was and who paid for that lawyer (Ritter seems to have unlimited funds for global travel).

And that's just the start of my questions.

64 posted on 01/19/2003 5:08:39 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
And I have been accused of having an over-active imagination. LOL! Don't change a thing, MM. Well, you might try decaf. :)
65 posted on 01/19/2003 5:14:26 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Here's the real deal. Hildebeast and the Toon's rump-swabs had this skinny from the get go. That piano-legged viper had that nitwit by the short hairs.

Do you recall what Nixon's buddy, Charles Carlson once stated?

"If you got'em by the balls, their hearts and minds will follow".....This is one the H'beasts' top ten tenets.

(....FBI files...much more valuable than a Whitewater river bed...)

Mustang sends.
66 posted on 01/19/2003 5:14:27 AM PST by Mustang
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
...the case was sealed, and Colonie officials declined to release the arrest records, explaining the matter was adjourned in local court in contemplation of dismissal....

Sooo....he wasn't convicted?

67 posted on 01/19/2003 5:19:44 AM PST by Byron_the_Aussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkwells
You've got to see this!
68 posted on 01/19/2003 5:19:47 AM PST by snippy_about_it (Pray for our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
ping I wonder if Pitt knows yet? LOL
69 posted on 01/19/2003 5:20:21 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Well, he met that Russian in 1988.

This if from an interview he did which is kind of awkward to post. If he really saw this and believes this, how could he turn his back on it? Now I have to wonder if he was just there picking up chicks. :

Q : You've spoke about having seen the children's prisons in Iraq. Can you describe what you saw there?

A: The prison in question is at the General Security Services headquarters, which was inspected by my team in Jan. 1998. It appeared to be a prison for children — toddlers up to pre-adolescents — whose only crime was to be the offspring of those who have spoken out politically against the regime of Saddam Hussein. It was a horrific scene. Actually I'm not going to describe what I saw there because what I saw was so horrible that it can be used by those who would want to promote war with Iraq, and right now I'm waging peace.

70 posted on 01/19/2003 5:20:54 AM PST by piasa (Boy! I say, boy! Bring me that there squirrelly-rifle over yonder!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Mustang
Carlson=Colson..(SP)?
71 posted on 01/19/2003 5:21:35 AM PST by Mustang
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Anyone willing to bet that this isn't the first time Ritter has committed a crime like this? Perhaps the Iraqis caught him earlier and "convinced" him to help them.
72 posted on 01/19/2003 5:24:26 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you can't beat 'em, beat 'em anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
As they used to say on Saturday Night Live....... Velly interrrresting ....
I wonder if FNC will still bring him on as an "expert".... and an expert on what?......he he


http://W-04.com

73 posted on 01/19/2003 5:30:06 AM PST by W04Man (Bush2004 Grassroots Campaign aka BushBot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Why would he have seen a children's prison, as a UN inspector? Whhat was he doing there? (A very unwholesome thought has crossed my mind.)
74 posted on 01/19/2003 5:30:24 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
Scott Ritter was secretly prosecuted

Isn't that something that the left is screaming about in regards to detained AlQueda? I guess it's OK when its one of yours.

75 posted on 01/19/2003 5:35:19 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim (Another disturbed youth makes good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; AntiGuv; dubyaismypresident; Grani; ...
Scottie boy? Into internet porn? Was it kiddie porn? Nail that SOB to the wall!

"Hold muh beer 'n watch this!" PING....

If you want on or off this list, please let me know!

76 posted on 01/19/2003 5:36:55 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
You betcha.

But I want to know a whole lot more about the circumstances of his arrest, if he had any priors (say...in Iraq or another state), why the asst. DA didn't think to tell her boss...and so much more.

I do hope Fox is on the ball with this story...and I wonder if the date Fox canned Ritter coincides with the date he was busted.

77 posted on 01/19/2003 5:38:56 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Didn't Scottie say that Mr. Compassion threw a few bottles of water into a cell at the children's prison? What a guy.
78 posted on 01/19/2003 5:40:02 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
Who is will pitt and what does he do..or what did he do?
79 posted on 01/19/2003 5:47:04 AM PST by Claire Voyant ((visualize whirled peas))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Next time he's on TV babbling about his insights, someone must ask him if he is being blackmaled.
80 posted on 01/19/2003 5:48:31 AM PST by elhombrelibre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 601-617 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson