Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is “Thanksgiving” Catholic?
Credo ^ | 11/24/2008 | Taylor Marshall

Posted on 11/24/2008 9:14:27 AM PST by Alex Murphy

This history books will tell you that the first Thanksgiving was celebrated by the pilgrims in 1621. Not true.

An interesting bit of trivia is that the first American Thanksgiving was actually celebrated on September 8, 1565 in St. Augustine, Florida. The Native Americans and Spanish settlers held a feast and the Holy Mass was offered.

A second similar "Thanksgiving" celebration occurred on American soil on April 30, 1598 in Texas when Don Juan de Oñate declared a day of Thanksgiving to be commemorated by the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.

The Catholic origins of Thanksgiving don’t stop there. Squanto, the beloved hero of Thanksgiving, was the Native American man who mediated between the Puritan Pilgrims and the Native Americans. Squanto had been enslaved by the English but he was freed by Spanish Franciscans. Squanto thus received baptism and became a Catholic. So it was a baptized Catholic Native American who orchestrated what became known as Thanksgiving.

All that being said, Thanksgiving is traditional Protestant and marks the tradition of religious toleration (something in which the Puritan pilgrims did not actually believe - they set up a "theocracy").

My wife once taught at an high-church Episcopalian/Anglican classical school in Philadelphia. The school consciously played down the significance of Thanksgiving. Why? The reason is simple. At root, Thanksgiving commemorates the good fortune of political and ecclesiastical rebels against the Church of England and the Anglican tradition as a whole.

It all started with Richard Clyfton who was a Church of England parson in Nottinghamshire in the early 1600s. Clifton sympathized with the Separatists of that era. Separatists were Calvinistic non-conformists to the doctrine and liturgy of the Church of England. The Hampton Court Conference held by King James I (1604) condemned those who would not conform to the more outwardly Catholic usages in the Church of England (e.g. robes, candles, bowing the head at the name of Christ, processions). The result was that Richard Clyfton was “defrocked” and stripped of his clerical status in the Church of England. Shortly thereafter Richard Clyfton went to Amsterdam and was followed by his disciples: the Pilgrims.

These Pilgrims moved around a bit until finally coming to America in 1620. An interesting bit of trivia is that one child was born on board the Mayflower while at sea. The child was given the rather lame name: “Oceanus”. Poor child.

In 1621, the Pilgrims allegedly celebrated a happy meal with the Native Americans and the rest is history. So why would an Anglican school be against Thanksgiving? It celebrates those who defied the Church of England and the Crown of England.

Now that I’m a no longer an Anglican and now a Catholic, things are a bit different. The penal laws of England regarding non-conformists affected not only the rigorous Calvinistic Puritans in England, but also the English Catholic recusants. The Pilgrims shared the same lot as the Catholic faithful of England. Interestingly enough, the Catholics who lived in Nottinghamshire where the Pilgrims originated were persecuted mercilessly.

So while Thanksgiving may celebrate the Calvinists Separatists who fled England, Catholics might remember the same unjust laws that granted the crown of martyrdom to Thomas More, John Fisher, Edmund Campion, et al. are the same injustices that led the Pilgrims to Plymouth.

Another bit of trivia is that the truly “First Thanksgiving” celebration occurred on American soil on April 30, 1598 in Texas when Don Juan de Oñate declared a day of Thanksgiving to be commemorated by the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.

And let everyone remember that “Thanksgiving” in Greek is Eucharistia. Thus, the Body and Blood of Christ is the true “Thanksgiving Meal”.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History; Mainline Protestant
KEYWORDS: guyfawkes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: Edizzl79

To some extent they were. Technically they were dissenting from the Church of England, but the reason they were dissenting was because they believed the Church of England was too contaminated with “Romish doctrines” and “Popery”.

The Puritans so despised the Elizabethan church that when Cromwell took over the government, they actually dug up Archbishop Parker’s body and burned it.


21 posted on 11/24/2008 9:50:27 AM PST by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Binstence
I find the post to be informative and interesting. Discussing history is never childish but responding to the discussion in a snotty two sentence blurb is.

Actually, I and other posters agreed with his sentiments. Your response, however, is nothing but a snotty two sentence blurb. And let me guess, you're Catholic.
22 posted on 11/24/2008 9:51:22 AM PST by newguy357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo; Alex Murphy
Trying to argue over who owns Thanksgiving is a childish sentiment. The holiday of Thanksgiving is neither Catholic nor Protestant, it is American.

AMEN!

23 posted on 11/24/2008 9:52:22 AM PST by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998
Amen. There’s plenty of interesting historical facts connected with the act of Thanksgiving and the only thing about it that is “American” is eating Turkey in late November. Christians have been giving thanks for nearly 2000 years.

Please stop these meaningless attempts at profundity. If we want to act about the generic act of "thanksgiving" (lowercase T, genius), it has gone on since the creation of the world. Everyone here is talking about the capital T Thanksgiving, and redefining it to try to be profound is just moronic.
24 posted on 11/24/2008 9:53:03 AM PST by newguy357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Philo-Junius
One could equally argue that the Pilgrims were fleeing Holland, which was, well, too Dutch.

Not honestly.
25 posted on 11/24/2008 9:54:11 AM PST by newguy357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
Both Florida and Texas were Spanish colonies at the time, and these events were celebrated by Spanish colonists -- hardly a predecessor event for the English colonial celebration.
26 posted on 11/24/2008 9:56:14 AM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative (ACORN is a criminal enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Two years ago, my wife and I spent a week in St Augustine, and discovered that the American History compiled by the North Atlantic Historians ignored or omitted a lot of data/history re St Augustine besides your post.

Like: “St. Augustine’s history as the oldest city in the USA, starting with Ponce de Leon’s discovery of Florida in 1513.”


27 posted on 11/24/2008 10:06:31 AM PST by Grampa Dave (This is the link to Leo Donofrio's new website: http://thenaturalborncitizen.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Rush had an explanation the other day.

The Massachussetts first Thanksgiving was actually a celebration of the end of socialism.

As Rush explained it:


When the Pilgrims first landed in Plymouth, land was distributed evenly and everyone was expected to provide all their produce to a common storehouse. Pilgrims were then allowed to take what they needed.

Of course this failed miserably, and some Pilgrims died of starvation.

Then they switched to a system of capitalism, where producers kept what they produced and sold what they wanted to sell. Then the Colony flourished...and only then did they have their first Thanksgiving.


Since this is quite different from what i was taught in publik skool, I meant to look this up.


28 posted on 11/24/2008 10:12:21 AM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newguy357

Why is that?

Where had most Pilgrims lived before they embarked for the New World?

Was there not complete religious liberty in Holland?


29 posted on 11/24/2008 10:13:08 AM PST by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Besides the title this find is actually pretty interesting. Thanks for posting this.


30 posted on 11/24/2008 10:30:41 AM PST by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (To those who believe the world was safer with Saddam, get treatment for that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

As a Catholic, I have celebrated Thanksgiving every year that I have been alive. Never thought otherwise.


31 posted on 11/24/2008 10:37:41 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Binstence

You did not ping me, but you say you are an independent thinker but won’t allows other to have that same independent thought? Why?


32 posted on 11/24/2008 10:39:14 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Philo-Junius

I think they wore out their welcome. However I have seen a painting of 17th Century Amsterdam where children on skates were clearly carrying hockey sticks.


33 posted on 11/24/2008 10:50:26 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
A second similar "Thanksgiving" celebration occurred on American soil on April 30, 1598 in Texas when Don Juan de Oñate declared a day of Thanksgiving to be commemorated by the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.

Having nearly starved to death in the Chihuahua desert before reaching the Rio Grande valley at present-day El Paso, Texas, Don Juan de Oñate and his expedition had plenty to be thankful for. Their Thanksgiing meal featured fish and duck, but ptobably not turkey. Oñate and his men eventually settled in what is now Espanola, NM.

34 posted on 11/24/2008 11:26:10 AM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newguy357

You wrote:

“Please stop these meaningless attempts at profundity.”

It was merely a comment and it wasn’t meaningless - which could be said for your apparent need to attack a comment not directed toward you.

“If we want to act about the generic act of “thanksgiving” (lowercase T, genius), it has gone on since the creation of the world.”

Did I ever say otherwise? No. But as CHRISTIANS it could only have been going on for 2,000 years, “genius”. I guess that simple fact went right by you.

“Everyone here is talking about the capital T Thanksgiving, and redefining it to try to be profound is just moronic.”

I neither tried to redefine it, nor did I say anything profound. I made a comment. You are clearly in need of help for your comments are not only unnecessarily antagonistic considering nothing was addressed to you, but you lash out at me personally. Grow up.


35 posted on 11/24/2008 11:35:19 AM PST by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Nope. Everybody knows it’s Greek Orthodox.

Many Orthodox Christians are still on the Julian Calendar (all were back in the day). Thanksgiving almost always falls on the day before the 40 day Christmas fast (no meat or dairy) begins. So they gathered up all their meat and cheese and had a great festival of thanksgiving.

One guy, Demetrious Hellenopoulipolous, introduced this to America when his ship, carrying a new breed of chicken which he called a Turk-ease, blew a bit off course. (He called them “Turk-ease” because he thought they looked like dressed up Turkish soldiers and the catharsis from chopping off their heads eased his frustration at being occupied by the Turks.)

He tried selling the Turk-ease to the colonists, but they weren’t sure about how it would taste. The fast was about to start, so he figured he’d cook them all up for everybody so they could see how good they tasted.

When the English Colonists came to the feast, they asked him, “Are you Catholic?” He would respond “No, I’m Orthodox.” They’d say, “So you’re a Protestant. Are you Anglican?” He’d respond, “No, I’m Orthodox.”

They’d ask, “ . . . but you’re not Catholic and you’re not Anglican . . .”

“No.”

“Okay, so you’re a Calvinst.”

“No. You see, in the year . . . oh forget it.”

From all that confusion, the English Colonists thought it was anti-Anglican and anti-Catholic and they were all for it.

Of course they dropped the whole fasting part as being Popish.

Now you know the truth about Thanksgiving.


36 posted on 11/24/2008 11:38:54 AM PST by cizinec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Edizzl79
Isn’t Catholicism what the pilgrims were running away from?!

Ab-so-lootely. They were being forced by the Pope's Swiss Guards to dig a tunnel to Rome. Furthermore, their children were forced to attend parochial schools in which their hands were slapped with rulers for making mistakes in their Latin prayers.

They then escaped; sailed to Cape Cod, Massachusetts, but were so dismayed by meeting the heavy-drinking Catholics there, that they sailed over to Plymouth, where some years later they joined the Puritans in whipping Quakers naked through the streets of Boston and attempted to gain Biblical Knowledge of nubile Native Americans.

37 posted on 11/24/2008 12:01:04 PM PST by Kenny Bunk (Looking forward to life under our new emperor in new clothes, Skippy-o Africanus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Edizzl79
Isn’t Catholicism what the pilgrims were running away from?!

Ab-so-lootely. They were being forced by the Pope's Swiss Guards to dig a tunnel to Rome. Furthermore, their children were forced to attend parochial schools in which their hands were slapped with rulers for making mistakes in their Latin prayers.

They then escaped; sailed to Cape Cod, Massachusetts, but were so dismayed by meeting the heavy-drinking Catholics there, that they sailed over to Plymouth, where some years later they joined the Puritans in whipping Quakers naked through the streets of Boston and attempted to gain Biblical Knowledge of nubile Native Americans.

38 posted on 11/24/2008 12:02:53 PM PST by Kenny Bunk (Looking forward to life under our new emperor in new clothes, Skippy-o Africanus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Edizzl79

Repetitio mater scientiae.


39 posted on 11/24/2008 12:04:22 PM PST by Kenny Bunk (Looking forward to life under our new emperor in new clothes, Skippy-o Africanus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: cizinec

ROTFL!


40 posted on 11/24/2008 4:05:41 PM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson