Posted on 09/19/2014 6:29:50 AM PDT by fatima
September 17, 2014
Explaining My Decision to Serve as Grand Marshal
I haven’t been in this much hot water since I made the comment, right after I arrived as your archbishop five-and-a-half years ago, that Stan Musial—my boyhood hero of my hometown St. Louis Cardinals—was a much better ballplayer than Joe DiMaggio!
Now I’m getting as much fiery mail and public criticism over my decision to accept the honor of Grand Marshal of this year’s St. Patrick’s Day Parade. According to the critics, I should have refused, due to the Parade Committee’s decision to allow a group of self-identified Gays of Irish ancestry to march in the parade with their own banner.
As with Stan Musial, I’ll stand by my decision. However, enough of you have courteously expressed some confusion and dismay, that, as your pastor, I owe you an explanation. Let me try.
For one, the decision to change the parade protocol was not mine. The archbishops of New York have never been “in charge” of the parade. Although my predecessors and I have always enjoyed friendly cooperation with the Parade Committee—and still do—and deeply appreciate the identity of the Parade as a celebration purely of Irish heritage, intimately linked to the Catholic Faith, we’ve never had a say in Parade policy or the choice of the Grand Marshal. Nor did we expect or want one!
So, in the current “brawl,” (they have been hardly rare in the Parade’s grand 253-year history!), I did not make the decision! You will recall that I in the past often expressed support for the former policy—that the only banners and identification to be carried was that the group was Irish—and that I found it logical and fair. To those who charged that the policy was “anti-Gay,” I often observed that no one person, Gay or not, was excluded from the parade. This was simply a reasonable policy about banners and public identification, not about the sexual inclinations of participants.
I did not oppose the former policy; nor did I push, condone, or oppose the new one. While the Parade committee was considerate in advising me of the change, they did not ask my approval, nor did they need to.
However, I admit that, for most folks, this is not the reason they are upset with me, and this brings us to point two. Many of you, while acknowledging that the decision to change policy was not mine, feel strongly that I should protest it, publicly condemn it, no longer support the Parade, and refuse the invitation to serve as Grand Marshal.
While a handful have been less than charitable in their reactions, I must admit that many of you have rather thoughtful reasons for criticizing the committee’s decision: you observe that the former policy was fair; you worry that this is but another example of a capitulation to an “aggressive Gay agenda,” which still will not appease their demands; and you wonder if this could make people think the Church no longer has a clear teaching on the nature of human sexuality.
Thank you for letting me know of such concerns. I share some of them.
However, the most important question I had to ask myself was this: does the new policy violate Catholic faith or morals? If it does, then the Committee has compromised the integrity of the Parade, and I must object and refuse to participate or support it.
From my review, it does not. Catholic teaching is clear: “being Gay” is not a sin, nor contrary to God’s revealed morals. Homosexual actions are—as are any sexual relations outside of the lifelong, faithful, loving, lifegiving bond of a man and woman in marriage—a moral teaching grounded in the Bible, reflected in nature, and faithfully taught by the Church.
So, while actions are immoral, identity is not! In fact, as the Catechism of the Catholic Church reminds us, people with same-sex attraction are God’s children, deserving dignity and respect, never to be treated with discrimination or injustice.
To the point: the committee’s decision allows a group to publicize its identity, not promote actions contrary to the values of the Church that are such an essential part of Irish culture. I have been assured that the new group marching is not promoting an agenda contrary to Church teaching, but simply identifying themselves as “Gay people of Irish ancestry.”
If the Parade Committee allowed a group to publicize its advocacy of any actions contrary to Church teaching, I’d object. As Cardinal John O’Connor remarked, we do not change the Creed—and I’d add, the Ten Commandments—to satisfy political correctness.
In fact, the leaders of the Parade Committee tried to be admirably sensitive to Church teaching. They worried that the former policy was being interpreted as bias, exclusion, and discrimination against a group in our city, which, if true, would also be contrary to Church teaching. While they were quick to acknowledge that, in reality, the policy was not unfair at all, they were also realistic in worrying that the public perception was the opposite, no matter how often they tried to explain its coherence and fairness.
I found their sensitivity wise, and publicly said so.
If, in doing so, I have shown an insensitivity to you, I apologize.
I share the hope of the organizers that the March 17th parade will be loyal to its proud heritage of celebrating Irish identity, culture, and contributions—all a beautiful part of Catholicism— thus bringing this great community together in unity and festivity, and look forward to leading it as Grand Marshal.
“For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but wanting to have their ears tickled, they will accumulate for themselves teachers in accordance to their own desires,”
Hairs being split by the Pharisees...
No Author. (Cardinal Dolan)
No link
Not hard to do when posting
Perhaps Dolan has skeletons. Way to eager to please sodomites.
I put the link.
Dolan is wrong... and is using an argument of semantics to justify his need to be honored ( rather than seeking humility)
His first point is correct the decision is not his to make. As he concedes he does have the ability to decline the invitation to participate. The people who carry the LGBT banner are not just “sharing an identity” they are active participants in a deviant and perverted lifestyle. How many of these banner carriers does he really think abstain from sex? No, they are advertising their active engagement in perversion not innocently announcing some genetic glitch they possess. Why would you carry a banner to celebrate something you don’t participate in?
What will he say if these innocent but misunderstood people participate in gay orgies for all to see, during this parade?
Satan tempted Jesus in the desert with dominion over Earth if He would bow down to him... apparently Dolan has taken him up on it and forgotten to imitate Christ.
I would not think it to be a matter of pride, or a condition to be published enthusiastically, that one suffers under the inclination to abuse one’s own life and body and that of others, but rather a condition for which one would humbly, daily, repent and seek forgiveness; not only for this but also toward all matters of faith and life where walk is contrary to Word. Really, is it proper to make one’s weakness the subject of parading about?
My thanks to the Mod who fixed this.((((Hugs))))
In other words, secular perception overrules God's law.
How has this man not been removed?
No sale.
You are a tool of the fascist gay agenda.
You should be defrocked and excommunicated.
What an idiot. Can’t wait until they show up dressed as nuns and get in his face. Never liked this guy from Day 1. Cardinal O’Conner, where are you?!
It would have been more understandable if Dolan had rejected the offer on principle rather than accept it in the pride of his conceit. The cardinal needs to reflect on the meaning of Christ-like humility, in my opinion.
Being grand marshall of a big parade is really cool and dope. Why let anything get in the way. Cardinals don’t have much opportunity for fun. Don’t y’all rain on his parade with that sin stuff.
Yes. I found it, high lighted it, copied it and pasted it. There is a spot for it when posting. If put in the designated spot you can just click on it.
Interesting article...thanks for posting. I don’t get the diocese going over to the dark side. Slippery slope. One should accept all people as children of God, doesn’t mean we have to accept their degenerate lifestyle.
I seriously doubt he feels any guilt at all; he is just tired of the emails and calls.
Disgusting explanation.
Disgusting example of a Catholic leader.
Well said.
I suspect that for this parade the homosexuals will behave themselves just so they can say that they are just like everyone else. But, the following year, it will have devolved to the typical foul display.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.