Posted on 10/03/2015 11:34:10 AM PDT by NYer
Catholic ping!
Unintended consequences
Follow up to your earlier post, ping!
Oh look. A Jesuit...
I hope more come out, so they too can be fired.
About time the Church got rid of the Lavender Mafia.
The same mafia that is responsible for 99% of the sexual abuse. . .(like a life of celibacy would make a healthy heterosexual male want to have sex with young boys. . .)
I remember once watching Headline News a long while back. On this particular report was the video of a woman priest (the first for this particular denomination, Episcopal I think) and how there were literally hundreds of “priests” there for this ordination.
Most will know that an ordination need not be so elaborate or have so many people attend, especially of the church hierarchy. The whole church full of “priests” raised a hand and leaned forward on each other and those closest to her laid hands on her, to “ordain!’ Okay...but then it struck me...I’ll speak as if it were those priests...”God said no, but all of us together overcome God and make it what we want!”
Same here...same always with gays in the church. I have zero problem letting them come to my church, party, home, outings and such, but when the homosexual demands that we tell God to go pound sand, they are acting as an enemy of God and should not be allowed to do so openly.
The fact he’s gone public in this act of defiance and hasn’t been relieved says a lot about this Francis’s agenda...
...remember to vote with your pocketbook.
I gave up on them years ago. The RCC is clearly incapable of internal reform. The fact that they had this priest in the Vatican in a position relating to doctrine (!) tells you all you need to know. The Lavender Mafia controls the Church from top to bottom. It's controlled the RCC for as long as I had anything to do with the RCC, and I can only imagine that boy love has always been part and parcel of RCC culture going back centuries.
In my parish I resisted all attempts to make me an altar boy. My gut told me putting on what looked a dress (cossack) and doing what the priest told me to do was not good.
Excommunicate the man for committing mortal sin. This guy is as bad as the preachers who sell out and accept gays and lesbians. Seems a number of these folks forget the message of not adding to the words of the bible and not taking away. The consequences are clearly stated.
An additional but unstated “demand” being unfettered access to 10 to 12 year old alter boys and indemnity in the event anyone sues for being sodomized.
Catholic priesthood has been a safe haven for homosexuals for hundreds of years. The perfect cover. My father was an ex-seminarian and said his class was loaded with homosexuals in the 1950’s.
He has a “partner? “. So his vows meant nothing? The Church isn’t goi g to persecute anyone for being gay - just don’t lie and pretend you are a faithful priest
He’s betrayed his church and flock. typical narcissistic, selfish homo
A few years ago I had a man working for me whose wife was a Native Hawaiian devout Catholic, who had moved with her husband to Boston.
She had a catering business and catered a Jesuit affair. She swore that it was a homosexual get together. She never felt so betrayed in her life.
What's your explanation for these?
It tells you that priests who entered seminaries after the 2nd Vatican council (1962-65) but before the avalanche of "the cruel documents that are incompetent to deal with the issue of homosexual persons" starting with Persona Humana (1975) and intensifying in 1990's (the list is in the article), -- were often gay. It also tells you that a closeted gay priest can rise to position of influence in the Church so long as he remains closeted. He comes out, -- he's fired.
Find something else to worry about in whatever religion you got yourself.
He's been fired from all his assignments (CDF and the University.) His "Ordinary" (diocesan bishop) or religious superior has to deal with him now. As has been noted earlier, he should be instantly deprived of his priestly faculties, and put on the fast track for an canonical laicization. But that's not the Pope's job.
I'm no expert on Canao Law, but I'm guessing it would be the Vicar for Rome, which as of the list in Wikipedia would be, at present, Cardinal Agostino Vallini.
well isn’t that special?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.