Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BEWARE THE RED HEIFER: How religious nutballs could start World War III
Antiwar.com ^ | April 15, 2002 | Justin Raimondo

Posted on 04/15/2002 10:18:54 AM PDT by H.R. Gross

Behind the Headlines
by Justin Raimondo
Antiwar.com

April 15, 2002

BEWARE THE RED HEIFER
How religious nutballs could start World War III

While the American secretary of state shuttles back and forth between Yasser Arafat and Ariel Sharon, trying desperately to cobble together a) a ceasefire, and b) some basis for a settlement of the world’s most tiresome perpetual crisis, it behooves us to examine the issue of … the red heifer.

Say what?

You heard me, I said the red heifer….

IMPOSSIBLE – YET IT HAPPENED!

When I was a lad, my favorite feature of the Sunday comics was something called “Impossible! – Yet It Happened!” Stories of haunted ghost ships, three-headed babies, and frogs mysteriously raining down from the heavens, odd occurrences chronicled in the classic style of Charles Fort and breathlessly described in lurid prose under the tantalizing headline: Impossible? Yet It Happened! It seemed to me to be a trope for the irrationality of the world I was beginning to enter, a sign that the society of adults wasn’t all it was cracked up to be: after if, if it’s impossible, then it couldn’t have happened – right?

Wrong! To confirm this fact, we need only look at the most significant recent development in the Middle East, and, no, I don’t mean the intifada, or Colin Powell’s visit, or the suicide bombings, or any of that other stuff: I’m talking about the recent birth of a red heifer on a farm in Israel. Why is this so important? The answer is to be found in a fascinating piece by Rod Dreher in National Review Online, “Red Heifer Days,” which recounts the theological significance of this event – and it’s ominous implications for the future of the region:

“Could this little calf born last month in Israel bring about Armageddon? The concept would have struck many people as absurd the last time such a calf was born, in 1997, and probably makes most readers laugh today. Big mistake: Never underestimate the power of religious faith to shape events, especially in the Holy Land. Especially right now.”

THE ESCHATOLOGICAL FACTOR

It all has to do with eschatology, a religious conception of the Final Days of mankind, a scenario mapped out by three of the world’s major religions in very similar (and specific) detail. The focus is on the Temple Mount – the site of Ariel Sharon’s provocative visit that set off the current intifada, and also site of the First Temple of the Hebrews. Destroyed by King Nebuchadnezzar,, and then again by the Romans, according to Jewish traditionalists the Third Temple will be built by the Messiah, who will be not only king of Israel but also high priest of the rebuilt Temple. To the Muslim Palestinians, and their co-religionists worldwide, this is the site of the Dome of the Rock, a Muslim shrine, the sacred al-Aqsa mosque, and the place where Mohammed mounted a fine Arabian horse and galloped straight up to heaven. A large number of Christian fundamentalists have also imbued this spot with millennialist import: according to this “dispensationalist” view, Jesus Christ will return to earth to do battle on the plain of Armageddon and triumph over the Antichrist only after the building of the Third Temple. Dreher cites Gershom Gorenberg, whose book, End of Days: Fundamentalism and the Struggle for the Temple Mount, describes the apocalyptic intersection of religion and politics both in Israel and the US:

“What happens at that one spot, more than anywhere else, quickens expectations of the End in three religions. And at that spot, the danger of provoking catastrophe is greatest.”

I hate to tell you this, but the danger just got much greater. Now, as for that red heifer….

OUR NUTBALLS, AND THEIRS

The key thing to remember, in all this mythological murk, is that no religious Jew is allowed to set foot on the Temple Mount, for fear of desecrating the sacred ground. In any case, the Temple can only be reconstructed when the Messiah returns to save his people, and, so far, no Messiah, and no Third Temple. But not all Israelis are willing to assume such a passive stance, tradition or no tradition. Ever since Israel came into possession of old Jerusalem, in 1967, a fanatical group of Israeli nationalists have tried to kick-start the eschatological machinery, plotting the destruction of the Muslim shrines and busily constructing the various ritual objects for use in the rebuilt Temple. These Israeli nutballs have forged a natural alliance with our Christian nutballs, who have their own theological rationale for hurrying Apocalypse along. They are dispensationalists, who believe – among other things – that the colonization of the Holy Land by the children of Israel signals the second coming of Christ: the efforts of these “Christian Zionists” account for the uncritical support for Israel among many “born again” Christian conservatives.

PROVOKING ARMAGEDDON

Okay, so now we get to the part about the red heifer: it turns out that, although no religious Jew is allowed on the Temple Mount, there’s a loophole – it’s okay if he or she is first purified in the ashes of a pure red heifer. These creatures are exceedingly rare. One was born a couple of years ago, in Israel, but it soon began sprouting white hairs on its tail and was deemed insufficiently pure by the rabbinical authorities. Ah, but science found a way around the fickleness of God’s creation, and through the modern miracle of genetic engineering – and funding provided by “Christian Zionists” in America – a red heifer has been bred, and pronounced pure. As Dreher points out, the world media covered this as a joke, but in reality the red heifer is the theological and political equivalent of a suitcase nuke waiting to go off. Dreher cites Richard Landes, a professor of history at Boston University and director of the Center for Millennial Studies:

“These kinds of circumstances are exactly what people are waiting for. We could be starting a war. If this is a real red heifer, and strict Orthodox rabbis have declared her worthy of sacrifice, then a lot of Jews in Israel will take that as a sign that a new phase of history is about to begin. The Muslims are ready for jihad anyway, so if you have Jews up there doing sacrifices, talk about a red flag in front of a charging bull.”

Rod Dreher, by the way, is the only writer I know of to catch the significance of this red heifer business, because the media tends to not take religion seriously, and yet I can’t help thinking that he perhaps unintentionally underscores another overlooked reality: that the problem of fundamentalism is not limited to the Arab world. The Islamic brand brought down the World Trade Center, but the Judeo-Christian varieties may succeed in starting World War III.

We have heard much about the evils of “moral equivalence” in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. The former, we are told, are superstitious terrorists, whose fanatical mindset makes the perfect receptacle for the hatching of murderous plots, while the Israelis are Westernized democrats, ensconced, just like us in, in a secularized consumer culture. But Dreher points to the existence and growing influence of Jewish fundamentalists, fanatics on the order of Al Qaeda, who could well spark an all-out Arab-Israeli war. Citing Professor Landes, he writes:

“’It’s entirely conceivable that this [red heifer] could trigger a new round of attempts to blow up the Dome of the Rock.’ This is something the Israeli security forces have long been vigilant against. But with their attentions drawn elsewhere by the war with the Palestinians, it’s possible that a radical group could slip the net. And it’s possible that religious extremists elements within the Israeli army could help them.”

EVEN IF…

As Colin Powell shuttles back and forth between Sharon and Arafat, I can’t help but think of that red heifer, growing fat and glossy under the ministrations of its deluded creators. Even if the US somehow succeeded in forging a “peace plan,” even if President Bush actually had the guts to stand up to Sharon and say: “Enough – or else!” Even if, somehow, the nutball tendencies among the Palestinians could be minimized or at least contained – even then, it seems, the cause of peace in the Holy Land is utterly doomed. For what happens at the end of three years, when the red heifer grows old enough to sacrifice, and its ashes can be used for purposes of ritual purification? At that point, the locus of religious conflict in the world could well see yet another Israeli invasion, this time prompted by an upsurge of religious fanaticism married to a virulent ultra-nationalism – precisely the forces that want to propel the Satanic Benjamin Netanyahu and his nutball followers into power.

HISTORY AND IRONY

Sharon knows full well that if he accedes to the demands of the Americans, Netanyahu, the ultra-hardliner, is bound to succeed him. The irony of US intervention, in brokering a “peace plan,” is the unintended consequence of a burgeoning religious supremacism in Israeli politics, one with the power to undo all the good work of American diplomacy.

A DANGEROUS HERESY

What, then, is the solution? The widespread idea that it is the task of American diplomacy to come up with a solution to all or even some of the world’s most intractable problems is precisely where US foreign policy has gone wrong since the days of the Founders. It is a dangerous heresy promulgated by cold warriors trained in the European tradition of realpolitik that the earth is our chessboard, and we must always be making or planning a move: this troublesome activism has been the cause of much misery in the world, and much social and economic dislocation in this country. It is responsible for the policy of perpetual war pursued in modern times by our rulers in Washington, and eventually it will be our undoing. For what can Colin Powell do against the red heifer? Against this improbable creature, the whole architecture of US policy in the Middle East could be laid low, and that is a humbling thought – or at least it ought to be.

INGRATITUDE, THY NAME IS ‘ISRAEL’

You’ll recall that the big reason for US involvement has been to clear the decks for an all-out attack on Iraq. Hey, but wait a minute – with all this talk of Saddam’s alleged “weapons of mass destruction,” the image one gets is of the Iraqi ruler raining missiles down on, say, Brooklyn. But he hasn’t got anything even close to that kind of range: now that the Iraqis and the Saudis have kissed and made up, his only possible target is Israel. We are begging Sharon to please lay off the Palestinians so we can do Israel the favor of taking out a deadly threat to its continued existence. And still, Sharon says no.

GO, COLIN, GO!

Since US tax dollars have funded the colonization and humiliation of a people, the Palestinians, the American secretary of state has a moral responsibility to see that they get a break, and a fair deal. Powell seems admirably committed to that, and he is more than living up to the role implicitly ascribed to him in this space as the conscience of the Bush administration. As such, he faces a powerful and vocal interventionist claque, reflexively pro-Sharon (actually, pro-Netanyahu), and highly influential in the Republican party. It’s one man against the War Party, a truly heroic struggle on Powell’s part, and, so far, he’s proving himself to be at least the equal of his adversaries. More power to him – as long as he sees that the only rational long-term strategy for the US in the Middle East is an exit strategy.

A FUTURE SCENARIO, CIRCA 3002

Our Israel-centric foreign policy, which has alienated the entire Arab world, Muslim and Christian alike, must go. The urgency of this reorientation is underscored by the Israeli government’s intransigence. We need to extricate ourselves from this volatile region, which seems cursed by some special blight, and a likely target of divine anger or some kind of retribution that can’t be long in coming. For all the good intentions, the diplomatic phrases, the talk of “peace” and “justice,” are as nothing when they come up against the awful power of the red heifer.

In this context, imagine the following scenario. It is the year 3002, and some kid is reading the Sunday funnies – yes, they still have Sunday comics, because some traditions are indeed sacred – and he comes across a little item that starts like this:

“How could a red heifer have started World War III? Impossible? Yet it happened….



TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: heifer; prophecy; red; redheiffer; worldwarthree; wwiii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-238 next last
To: H.R. Gross
I'm a secular non Jewish supporter of Israel.
61 posted on 04/15/2002 11:39:28 AM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: H.R. Gross, Justin Raimondo
RED HEIFER...

Oops my bad. I thought this was a thread about Helen Thomas or Hanan Ashwari.

62 posted on 04/15/2002 11:41:38 AM PDT by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: H.R. Gross
Excellent post........Really get to the meat of the whole thing. Our founding fathers were so right about religion and government.
63 posted on 04/15/2002 11:43:16 AM PDT by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
I would have guessed Molly Ivins.

MmmmmmmOOOOOOOOOOooooooo....

64 posted on 04/15/2002 11:43:51 AM PDT by RichInOC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: boris
"The mosque needs to be demolished; may as well get it over with."

Well, it has been there for a long time. It is getting to be an eyesore. And I imagine there is a "falling" hazard.

65 posted on 04/15/2002 11:44:03 AM PDT by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: boris
The mosque needs to be demolished; may as well get it over with.

Agreed, but it would be much more fitting if Saddam Insane did it with a poorly guided Scud...

66 posted on 04/15/2002 11:45:41 AM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark; cultural jihad
Indeed:

Instant cultist fedophile-to-English translation service:

"We moral-liberal fedophiliac jihdists equate conservative values with ideology , and thereby trivialize the latter while denigrating the former."

67 posted on 04/15/2002 11:47:38 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: texson66
Correct. In fact, Jerusalem is not even mentioned in the koran anywhere!

Actually, I was under the impression that it was. The Koran also mentions the promised land as a set aside for the Jews. (I suppose the interpretation is from a more sensible Muslim though)

68 posted on 04/15/2002 11:48:40 AM PDT by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: H.R. Gross
The militant Israelis and the crazy fundamentalists are not any less lunatic than the mullah, and the fanatic Moslems. Both are crazy about this GOD thing! They seem to be talking to God a lot on his “unpublished” number? They read their books with a different color glass than the rest of us. They interpret things and extrapolate things to meet their POLITICAL objectives. God is probably laughing his--- off looking down on these nut cases who are obsessed with the END, and looking forward to lit up the whole world on fire.

There is no way that you can talk sense to these Moslem fanatics, the Christian fanatics, and the Jewish fanatics. The communists had a good idea, deemphasizing religions. We don't need to go that far, but we need to impress upon the religious leaders to calm down this hysteria. Please! Religion, the way I know it, was to do good unto others, to forgive, to love. The Moslems and Jews don’t teach much of that in their house of worship, but the Christian do nothing but teaches people to be humble, and forgiving? How did these militant fundamentalists got this way, is very strange.

May I don’t want the end to come so soon, because I am afraid of this beast with seven heads and hundred eyes, and hundred tongs and yad yada yada….

69 posted on 04/15/2002 11:50:29 AM PDT by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: H.R. Gross
@#$%&! Justin, will you please learn to stop using three pages to make a point when three paragraphs are all that is necessary?
70 posted on 04/15/2002 11:51:36 AM PDT by muleboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #71 Removed by Moderator

To: H.R. Gross;poohbah

Justin "Kettle" Raimondo admonishing the pot that it is a "nutball."

72 posted on 04/15/2002 11:54:32 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HailToTheTheif
I agree that we should not go after Iraq till after we deal with our primary and militarily weaker enemies the Saudis.
73 posted on 04/15/2002 11:54:44 AM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: detsaoT
My "religion" manking evolving from apes was brutal stupid and savage.
74 posted on 04/15/2002 11:56:18 AM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Justin and religious nuts are all nutballs.
75 posted on 04/15/2002 11:58:22 AM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
"The continuous disasters of man's history are mainly due to his excessive capacity and urge to become identified with a tribe, nation, church or cause, and to espouse its credo uncritically and enthusiastically, even if its tenets are contrary to reason, devoid of self-interest and detrimental to the claims of self-preservation. We are thus driven to the unfashionable conclusion that the trouble with our species is not an excess of aggression, but an excess capacity for fanatical devotion."

I hate to say it, bud, but if this statement WERE true, then the Roman Empire would still exist today. Furthermore, if this statement WERE true (rather than just being an opinion), agencies like the UN would be effective in stopping war.

For, if it WERE true that the only thing preventing us from having GLOBAL PEACE was national identity, then we would've LONG ago been consolidated into one of the MANY large empires which have risen throughout the centuries (Persia, Greece, Rome, the United Kingdom, etc). Even with the advent of such super-entities as mentioned, internal fractionalism and strife STILL occurred, regardless of the fact that there was a Distinct Unifying Authority over all of the citizens in the jurisdiction thereof.

Therefore, I think whomever you quoted from is wrong.

:D ttt

76 posted on 04/15/2002 11:58:25 AM PDT by detsaoT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: weikel
My "religion" manking evolving from apes was brutal stupid and savage.

I'm still scratching my head at this. If you're saying that Evolution is also a religion, I'd tend to agree with you. If not, then I'll just keep scratching my head and wondering what the heck to make of this...

:) ttt

77 posted on 04/15/2002 12:00:33 PM PDT by detsaoT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
I actually did a seach on an online version of the koran in English and got no hits on Jerusalem.
78 posted on 04/15/2002 12:00:41 PM PDT by texson66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: H.R. Gross
And despite my not being a religious man for a nutball p**** like Raimondo to insult Bibi the Churchill of our age borders on blasphemy.
79 posted on 04/15/2002 12:03:21 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: H.R. Gross
This article is pure unadulterated leftist, humanist garbage. I'm ready to hit the abuse button just for seeing it posted. (but won't)
80 posted on 04/15/2002 12:03:23 PM PDT by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-238 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson