HOME/ABOUT  Prayer  SCOTUS  ProLife  BangList  Aliens  StatesRights  ConventionOfStates  WOT  HomosexualAgenda  GlobalWarming  Corruption  Taxes  Congress  Fraud  MediaBias  GovtAbuse  Tyranny  Obama  ObamaCare  Elections  Polls  Debates  Trump  Carson  Cruz  Bush  OPSEC  Benghazi  InfoSec  BigBrother  IRS  Scandals  TalkRadio  TeaParty  FreeperBookClub  HTMLSandbox  FReeperEd  FReepathon  CopyrightList  Copyright/DMCA Notice 

Dear FRiends, Please keep those donations coming in. We need your loyal support now more than ever. Thank you for your support, James

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Free Republic 4th Quarter Fundraising Target: $88,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $74,387
Woo hoo!! And now less than $13.7k to go!! Thank you all very much!!

Keyword: apuzzo

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Apuzzo May 30, 2012 Appellate Hearing in NJ--VIDEO

    Now we wait for another ruling before going to the next court. Thank goodness we have patriots like Mr. Apuzzo.
  • Obama lawyer Angelo Genova tries to suppress & intimidate NJ conservative press & citizen journalist

    04/19/2012 1:54:18 PM PDT · by Brown Deer · 15 replies
    CDR Kerchner (Ret)'s Blog ^ | April 18, 2012 | CDR Kerchner
    I heard this morning that the Obama lawyers are trying to suppress the videos of the NJ Obama Ballot Access Challenge public hearing. I just spoke with Attorney Mario Apuzzo and he confirmed that Obama’s lawyers have called him and told him they are planning to take legal action to get the videos of the NJ Ballot Access Challenge Public Hearing pulled and suppressed. What is the Obama side ashamed of and doesn’t want the world to see. Could it be that their Obama “emperor has no clothing on”, i.e., has no known conclusively proven true legal identity clothing/papers to...
  • Obama eligibility: NJ ALJ ducks issues

    04/10/2012 9:44:42 PM PDT · by Smokeyblue · 36 replies
    Conservative News and Views ^ | April 10, 2012 | Terry A. Hurlbut
    In the latest Obama eligibility challenge, an Administrative Law Judge cleared Obama for the New Jersey Democratic Primary today. The two men who objected to Obama’s nominating petition vowed to appeal. SNIP But the judge shocked Apuzzo when, at about 7:30 p.m., he called Apuzzo to tell him that the Obama campaign had prevailed on both points. Said the judge, according to Apuzzo: "As far as I’m concerned, Obama was born in Hawaii." Apuzzo could not explain how Judge Masin could rule that way, after observing in open court that neither Obama nor his surrogates had shown that he was...
  • The Faux Claims of John Woodman Regarding the “Natural Born Citizen” Clause

    04/03/2012 3:34:45 PM PDT · by rxsid · 5 replies
    puzo1.blogspot.com ^ | 4/2/2012 | Mario Apuzzo, Esq
    "The Faux Claims of John Woodman Regarding the “Natural Born Citizen” Clause By Mario Apuzzo, Esq. April 2, 2012 What is hilarious is how John Woodman, who claims to be a conservative Republican, is running around the internet proclaiming that he has saved the United States, its Constitution, and not only putative President Barack Obama, but also Republicans, Sen. Marco Rubio and Sen. Bobby Jindal (all three were not born to citizen parents, both of whom are citizens of the United States at the time of their birth) from the “Birthers.” He adds that he has proven that Attorney Leo...
  • Bond v. U.S. and Standing to Challenge Putative President Obama on His Eligibility to be President

    06/29/2011 12:06:08 PM PDT · by rxsid · 11 replies
    puzo1.blogspot.com ^ | 06/28/2011 | Mario Apuzzo, Esq
    "Bond v. United States and Standing to Challenge Putative President Obama on His Eligibility to be President The U.S. Supreme Court on June 16, 2011 decided Bond v. United States, 564 U. S. ____ (2011). The Bond decision does not say anything that has not been expected regarding filing a case which can establish standing to challenge Putative President Barack Obama on his legitimacy to be President. It has always been my position that a criminal defendant or someone being compelled to pay money challenging an Obama-endorsed Congressional statute which is the basis for the criminal charge against him or...
  • Natural Born Citizen Not Same as Natural Born Subject

    In feudal or monarchical constitutional theory, individuals were the subjects of a monarch or sovereign, but the republican constitutional theory of therevolutionary and post-revolutionary period conceived of the individual as a citizen andassigned sovereignty to the people. The distinction between citizens and subjects is reflected in Chief Justice John Jay’s opinion in Chisholm v. Georgia, [2 U.S. (2 Dall.)419 (1793)the first great constitutional case decided after the ratification of the Constitution of 1789: [T]he sovereignty of the nation is in the people of the nation, and the residuary sovereignty of each State in the people of each State . ....

    02/27/2011 7:26:01 PM PST · by STE=Q · 47 replies
    The Post & Email ^ | Feb. 27, 2011 | Mario Apuzzo
    Arizona is considering passing a law that, among other things, would allow a child born in the U.S. to one or two alien parents to be recognized as a “natural born Citizen.” Such a law would be passed in error. Apart from the proposed law being unconstitutional for violating the Supremacy Clause and the Pre-emption Doctrine, a law that recognizes an Article II “natural born Citizen” as including a child born in the U.S. to one or two alien parents would be contrary to what the Founders and Framers designed as a national security safeguard for the Offices of President...
  • The Citizenship Status of Our 44 Presidents

    02/17/2011 9:38:56 PM PST · by jdoug666 · 25 replies
    Before It's News ^ | 2/15/2011 | Mario Apuzzo
    A famous Holmesian dictum provides that "a page of history is worth a volume of logic."
  • Kerchner v. Obama: SCOTUS Orders List Due Out Today (inferring it's been dismissed)

    11/28/2010 11:46:15 PM PST · by STARWISE · 48 replies
    The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit of New Jersey affirmed the District Court’s dismissal, based on lack of standing and subject matter jurisdiction, of Kerchner v. Obama, calling the case “frivolous” and issuing a Precedential Opinion. Not to be taken lightly: *** [W]hen a judge calls an argument “ridiculous” or “frivolous,” it is absolutely the worst thing the judge could say. It means that the person arguing the position has absolutely no idea of what he is doing, and has completely wasted everyone’s time. *** The case relied, belatedly, on the de Vattel theory of natural born...
  • U.S. Supreme Court confers on Obama eligibility

    11/23/2010 9:43:51 PM PST · by Errant · 354 replies · 2+ views
    World Net Daily ^ | November 23, 2010 | Brian Fitzpatrick
    WASHINGTON – Is this the case that will break the presidential eligibility question wide open? The Supreme Court conferred today on whether arguments should be heard on the merits of Kerchner v. Obama, a case challenging whether President Barack Obama is qualified to serve as president because he may not be a "natural-born citizen" as required by Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution. Unlike other eligibility cases that have reached the Supreme Court, Kerchner vs. Obama focuses on the "Vattel theory," which argues that the writers of the Constitution believed the term "natural-born citizen" to mean...
  • Kerchner v Obama DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 23, 2010 (re: Barry's eligibility)

    11/08/2010 12:57:34 PM PST · by rxsid · 195 replies · 2+ views
    www.supremecourt.gov ^ | 11/08/2010 | SCOTUS
    No. 10-446 Title: Charles Kerchner, Jr., et al., Petitioners v. Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al. Docketed: October 4, 2010 Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Case Nos.: (09-4209) Decision Date: July 2, 2010 ~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Sep 30 2010 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 3, 2010) Nov 3 2010 Waiver of right of respondents Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al. to respond filed. Nov 3 2010 Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Western Center for Journalism.Nov 8...
  • Respondents Waive Right to Respond..Petition-Writ of Cert.to(SCOTUS)..Kerchner etal v Obama etal

    11/06/2010 2:43:29 PM PDT · by STARWISE · 45 replies
    Full title Respondents Waive the Right to Respond to the Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court for the Kerchner et al v Obama et al Lawsuit ### There is new activity on the U.S. Supreme Court Docket today with an effective date on the docket of 3 Nov 2010. Document HERE.1. The Respondents named in our Petition have waived their right to respond. 2. The Western Center of Journalism has filed a motion for leave to file an Amicus Curiae Brief in support of our petition. To read the Petition to the U.S. Supreme Court filed...
  • The True Meaning and Interpretation of Article II "natural born Citizen

    11/04/2010 8:01:39 PM PDT · by STE=Q · 52 replies
    Post & Email ^ | Nov. 4, 2010 | Jedi Pauly
    I wish to undertake a critical analysis of the incomplete works of attorneys Orly Taitz, Phil Berg, and Mario Apuzzo, concerning the meaning and definition of "natural born Citizen" within the political context and intent of Article II. It is my contention that none of the attorneys working on exposing the illegal usurper known as Barack Obama have described any valid theory of law that properly explains why Obama cannot possibly qualify to be President under Article II. I will show what I believe are their mistakes and limitations and expose their incomplete efforts as failed hypotheses rather than valid...
  • Congress Internal Memo--What to Tell Your Constituents in Answer to Obama Eligibility Questions

    11/05/2010 10:42:58 AM PDT · by rxsid · 84 replies
    puzo1.blogspot.com ^ | 11/05/2010 | Mario Apuzzo
    "Members of Congress Internal Memo--What to Tell Your Constituents in Answer to Obama Eligibility Questions - Their Talking Points Internal Memo RevealedMembers of Congress Internal Memorandum -- What to Tell Your Constituents in Answer to Obama Eligibility Questions - Their Talking Points Internal Memo Revealed. This was the spin that the Members of Congress were given to keep the American electorate at bay and confused in the debate about Obama's eligibility issues all the while the Congress did nothing to investigate the matter in a congressional hearing like they did for similar concerns about John McCain.We have obtained a copy...
  • Vanity: Mario Apuzzo's BC case is docketed at SCOTUS (O must respond by Nov 3?)

    10/26/2010 8:22:49 PM PDT · by Frantzie · 27 replies
    Vanity - Apuzzo blog | 10-26-2010 | Frantzie
    http://puzo1.blogspot.com/ Kerchner et al v Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed 30 Sep 2010 and docketed 04 Oct 2010 with the U.S. Supreme Court - Washington Times National Weekly edition - 25, 18, and 11 Oct 2010 issues, page 5. U.S. Supreme Court Docket Number: 10-446. Response from defendants due to the U.S. Supreme Court by 3 Nov 2010. [Update 13 Oct 2010: Kerchner v Obama - Supreme Court Activity]
  • Proof the Founders knew & accepted Vattel`s "naturels" to mean "natural born" (re:Obama eligibility)

    10/09/2010 12:21:49 AM PDT · by rxsid · 70 replies
    puzo1.blogspot.com ^ | 10/08/2010 | Teo the Bear
    "Absolute proof the Founders knew and accepted Vattel`s French "naturels" to mean "natural born" by: Teo the Bear @ http://www.thebirthers.org Found in the Library of Congress Website If you look at Article III in the body of the text below, you will see,Les consuls et vice consuls respectifs ne pourront être pris que parmi les sujets naturels de la puissance qui les nommera. Tous seront appointés par leur souverain respectif, et ils ne pourront en conséquence faire aucun trafic ou commerce quelconque ni pour leur propre compte, ni pour le compte d'autrui.Going down further to the end you will find...
  • Revolution Radio--Constitutional Crisis

    08/19/2010 3:24:52 AM PDT · by Vincent Jappi
    BligTalk Radio ^ | 8/19/2010 | Dr Kate
    Join Dr Kate as she welcomes Commander Charles Kerchner and Attorney Mario Apuzzo to Revolution Radio. Tonight's discussion includes an update on the case against Obama, thoughts about the Supreme Court's role, and next steps for Constitutionalists. http://www.blogtalkradio.com/drkate/2010/08/19/revolution-radio-constitutional-crisis
  • Atty Apuzzo & CDR Kerchner will be on Dr. Kate's Revolution Radio Show tonight - 8/18

    08/18/2010 3:56:52 PM PDT · by rxsid · 6 replies
    puzo1.blogspot.com ^ | 8/18/2010 | Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Commander USNR (Retired)
    "Atty Apuzzo & CDR Kerchner will be on Dr. Kate's Revolution Radio Show tonight - Wed, 18 Aug 2010, 9:00 p.m. EST Atty Mario Apuzzo and CDR Kerchner will be on the Revolution Radio Show hosted by Dr. Kate to discuss the status of the Kerchner et al vs Obama & Congress et al lawsuit for which a Writ of Certiorari is being prepared for submission to the U.S. Supreme Court. Direct link to Dr. Kate's Revolution Radio show at BlogTalkRadio.com: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/drkate/2010/08/19/revolution-radio-constitutional-crisis Dr. Kate's Blog: http://drkatesview.wordpress.com/Also, please cast your votes to Help the Cause to get the word out:1st: Vote...
  • An Open Letter to John McCain

    08/12/2010 10:27:49 PM PDT · by Vincent Jappi · 4 replies
    A Place to Ask Questions to Get the Right Answers ^ | August 12, 2010 | CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
    Will you do the right thing at this crucial time? We will see. We the People, history and God will be your final Judge Senator McCain, your Democratic/Progressive/Socialist opponents questioned your “natural born Citizenship” status in the 2008 election. The question I ask is, why didn’t you question Obama’s “natural born Citizen” status? That is the obvious response in a political battle. Especially with all the talk about Obama’s mysterious early life narrative back then and that continues to this day … but now as a roar as his phony life story is revealed more and more every day. Or...
  • 3rd C. Court of Appeals Finds Apuzzo Not Liable for Obama's/Congress’ Damages and Costs

    07/22/2010 4:13:50 PM PDT · by rxsid · 70 replies · 1+ views
    puzo1.blogspot.com ^ | 07/22/2010 | Mario Apuzzo, Esq
    "The Third Circuit Court of Appeals Finds Attorney Apuzzo Not Liable for Obama's/Congress’ Damages and Costs Incurred by Them in Defending the Kerchner Appeal On July 2, 2010, the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision affirming the New Jersey Federal District Court’s dismissal of the Kerchner et al v. Obama/Congress et al case for lack of Article III standing. The Court ordered that I show cause in 14 days why the Court should not find me liable for just damages and costs suffered by the defendants, not in having to defend against the merits of plaintiffs’ underlying...
  • Vote for eligibility Atny Mario Apuzzo to be on Freedom Watch with Judge Napolitano. FReep the poll

    07/20/2010 12:54:26 PM PDT · by rxsid · 26 replies · 1+ views
    obamareleaseyourrecords ^ | 07/20/2010 | ObamaRelease YourRecords
    "Vote now for eligibility Attorney Mario Apuzzo to be on Freedom Watch with Judge Napolitano Vote for eligibility Attorney Mario Apuzzo to be on Freedom Watch with Judge Napolitano... Right now Atty Apuzzo is ranked # 13 [actually, now #12]... No sign up required to vote, visit link below. Via Freedom Watch with the Judge; Mario Apuzzo, Esq. is the plaintiff's attorney in the Kerchner et al v. Obama civil case in the U.S. District Court of New Jersey. This is an active case challenging Barack Obama's eligibility to serve as president under the natural born citizen clause. This case...
  • 3rd Circuit Affirms Kerchner Dismissal & Orders Appellants to Show Cause (Possible Sanctions)

    07/02/2010 1:23:04 PM PDT · by BuckeyeTexan · 164 replies · 3+ views
    U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals ^ | 07/02/2010 | Judges: Sloviter, Barry and Hardiman
    SLOVITER, Circuit Judge. Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell J. LeNormand, and Donald H. Nelsen, Jr. (hereafter "Appellants") filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, alleging that President Barack Obama is ineligible to hold his Office as President. They rely on Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 of the United States Constitution which provides that "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President. ..." U.S. Const., art. II,...
  • Kerchner v. Obama Appeal to the Third Circuit to Be Decided on the Briefs with No Oral Argument

    06/15/2010 10:48:31 AM PDT · by rxsid · 322 replies · 3,665+ views
    puzo1.blogspot.com ^ | 6/15/2010 | Mario Apuzzo, Esq
    "Tuesday, June 15, 2010 The Kerchner et al v. Obama/Congress et al Appeal to the Third Circuit to Be Decided on the Briefs with No Oral Argument The Third Circuit Court of Appeals which sits in Philadelphia has notified me today by letter dated June 15, 2010 that there will not be any oral argument on the Kerchner appeal to that Court. The case will be submitted on the briefs on Tuesday, June 29, 2010. Our presence is therefore not required. The Court also informed me that the Third Circuit Panel that will decide the appeal will be comprised of...
  • The Post & Email’s exclusive interview with Eligibility Attorney Mario Apuzzo

    06/10/2010 4:40:58 AM PDT · by 1234 · 10 replies · 229+ views
    The Post & Email ^ | Jun. 9, 2010 | Sharon Rondeau
    ...I heard you on Dr. Kate’s radio program the other night, and it caught my attention when you said that you believe that your case will end up at the Supreme Court despite the fact that the Third Circuit is scheduled to hear your appeal. Could you expound on that?...Yes. If the Third Circuit affirms the District Court’s decision to dismiss the case for lack of standing and political question, then the Kerchner plaintiffs will file a Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court. It does not mean that the court will necessarily hear the case because you’re essentially...
  • An Article II “natural born Citizen” Is Not the Same...

    05/19/2010 12:12:23 PM PDT · by patlin · 40 replies · 830+ views
    A “natural born subject” under English common law could never renounce his or her allegiance. Mannie Brown explained the “old common-law doctrine Nemo potest exuere patriam by quoting Lord Coke in Calvin’s Case: “Ligeance is a true and faithful obedience of the subject due to his Sovereign. This ligeance and obedience is an incident inseparable to every subject; for as soon as he is born he oweth by birth-right ligeance and obedience to his Sovereign.” Mannie Brown, Expatriation of Infants, University of Toronto Press 97 (1939). But as we have seen above, in his 1799 citizenship law Jefferson wrote that...
  • The Nonsense Published by Our Nation’s Editors Regarding Obama’s Eligibility to be President

    05/14/2010 3:03:17 PM PDT · by Red Steel · 21 replies · 725+ views
    A Place to Ask Questions to Get the Right Answers ^ | Wednesday, May 12, 2010 | Mario Apuzzo
    As an example of the nonsense that is produced by our nation’s editors regarding the Obama eligibility issue, one can read the story entitled, Taking Issue With the Birthers, written by Daily Titan Opinion Editor, Skylaw Smith, and posted on May 9, 2010, at the Daily Titan at: http://www.dailytitan.com/2010/05/09/taking-issue-with-the-birthers/comment-page-1/#comment-15663. Mr. Smith’s opinion article is factually inaccurate and highly biased. Mr. Smith attempts to ridicule the efforts of those who question where Obama was born, people that he calls “extremists and conspiracy theorists,” by equating their Obama birthplace inquiry to one involved in a “college level thesis of human genetics.” But...
  • The Court and Congress Expected the Other to Resolve the Obama Eligibility Question

    04/17/2010 2:34:13 PM PDT · by STARWISE · 38 replies · 1,580+ views
    On Thursday, April 15, 2010, Hon. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was giving testimony before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on the issue of the composition of the United States Supreme Court. The hearing was broadcast on C-Span. Subcommittee Chairman, Rep. Jose Serrano, D-NY (now the most senior Member of Congress of Puerto Rican descent), and he were having a pleasant exchange. Rep. Serrano was explaining to Justice Thomas how he feels “a little uneasy” despite much of the dismay of his friends on the “left” about having a hearing for the Supreme Court because of the respect that he...
  • Kerchner-v-Obama-Appeal-Motion-for-Leave-to-File-Supplemental-Appendix

    04/11/2010 7:34:10 AM PDT · by Elderberry · 21 replies · 1,074+ views
    Scribd ^ | 4/10/2010 | Mario Apuzzo
    . We explained in Appellants’ Opening Brief and Reply Brief that while the issue before the Court is one of standing and political question, the merits of plaintiffs’ claims are important to the showing that plaintiffs must make to prove that they have standing. The importance of the merits of plaintiffs’ claims is made evident by the recent state court decision in Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana, 916 N.E.2d 678 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). We realize that the Ankeny case is a state court decision and not binding on the federal courts. We nevertheless cite to it...
  • 3rd Circuit picks June 29 for eligibility case

    04/08/2010 7:00:00 PM PDT · by Man50D · 68 replies · 1,955+ views
    WorldNetDaily.com ^ | April 08, 2010 | Bob Unruh
    A federal court case that argues President Obama probably is not even a U.S. citizen, much less a "natural born citizen" as required by the U.S. Constitution of the chief executive officer, has been scheduled by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for June 29. In a letter dated yesterday to Mario Apuzzo, the attorney representing plaintiff Charles Kerchner and others, the clerk of the court said the case has been "tentatively listed on the merits on Tuesday, June 29, 2010." The notice said there is a possibility the case would have to be moved, and the court "will...
  • Court told 'citizen' Obama actually may be alien

    03/25/2010 6:53:40 AM PDT · by opentalk · 135 replies · 3,855+ views
    WND ^ | March 25, 2010 | Bob Unruh
    Forget the dispute over the "natural born citizen" requirement of the U.S. Constitution for presidents, Barack Obama may not even be a "citizen," according to a new filing in a long-running legal challenge to his eligibility to occupy the Oval Office. "Under the British Nationality Act of 1948 his father was a British subject/citizen and not a United States citizen and Obama himself was a British subject/citizen at the time Obama was born," says a new filing in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in the case Kerchner v. Obama. "We further contend that Obama has failed to even conclusively...
  • Kerchner v Obama & Congress Appeal Reply Brief and Oral Argument Request Filed

    03/22/2010 11:31:20 PM PDT · by STARWISE · 19 replies · 1,132+ views
    I have completed filing the Kerchner Reply Brief and Request for Oral Argument. These documents may be accessed at the indicated links. All parties have completed filing all briefs and now we just need a decision from the Court. We will now wait and see if the Third Circuit Court of Appeals grants my request for oral argument and if so when the oral argument will be. If oral argument is granted, it will take place at the United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit, U.S. Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The courthouse is located right across the street...
  • Obama banks on 'no standing' decision

    03/08/2010 7:17:38 PM PST · by Man50D · 49 replies · 503+ views
    WorldNetDaily.com ^ | March 08, 2010 | Bob Unruh
    One of the banks of attorneys assigned to quash demands for documentation that President Obama is constitutionally eligible to occupy the Oval Office is counting on a ruling that American citizens have no "standing" to demand that information. The attorneys argued in a brief submitted to the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals that any injury to someone whose president is not eligible is the same injury for all people, so the individual has no legal standing to complain. WND has reported on the case brought by attorney Mario Apuzzo in January 2009 on behalf of Charles F. Kerchner Jr.,...
  • Obama - Maybe a Citizen of the United States But Not a Natural Born Citizen

    03/05/2010 4:25:45 AM PST · by Spaulding · 131 replies · 2,542+ views
    The question which has gripped our Constitutional Republic is whether putative President, Barack Obama, is eligible to be President and Commander in Chief of the Military. Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of our Constitution provides that: “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.” Despite...
  • Court Grants Motion for Leave to File Overlength Brief in Kerchner Appeal (eligibility)

    02/24/2010 6:42:59 PM PST · by STARWISE · 5 replies · 385+ views
    On January 19, 2010, I filed the Appellants' Opening Brief in the appeal of Kerchner et al. v. Obama et al. which is currently pending in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia. In that appeal, we maintain that the New Jersey Federal District Court erred in dismissing our case by ruling that plaintiffs do not have standing to challenge Obama's alleged eligibility to be President and Commander in Chief of the Military and that our case presents a non-justiciable political question. In our case, we have provided the Founder’s and Framers’ definition of an Article II “natural born...
  • Appeals court: We're listening to eligibility case (re: Kerchner v. Obama)

    02/24/2010 1:03:52 PM PST · by rxsid · 152 replies · 2,993+ views
    WND ^ | February 23, 2010 | Bob Unruh
    "Appeals court: We're listening to eligibility case Judges grant permission for lengthy filing in case challenging Obama An appeals court has indicated it is listening to arguments in a case that challenges Barack Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office with a ruling that gives special permission for an extra-long document to be filed in the case. WND has reported on the case brought by attorney Mario Apuzzo in January 2009 on behalf of Charles F. Kerchner Jr., Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James Lenormand and Donald H. Nelson Jr. Named as defendants were Barack Hussein Obama II, the U.S., Congress, the...
  • What's Obama's Birther Legal Bill?

    01/31/2010 4:42:58 PM PST · by STARWISE · 140 replies · 3,379+ views
    Mother Jones ^ | 1-26-10 | Stephanie Mencimer
    Activists charge that Obama has spent millions to silence them in court. Not exactly, say the government’s lawyers. ### Is President Barack Obama spending millions of dollars to hide the truth about his citizenship? During Obama's 2008 run for the White House, his campaign and a host of other credible sources repeatedly debunked the conspiracy theory that Obama was born in Kenya, not Hawaii, and was thus ineligible to serve as president. But this failed to quell the "birther" movement, whose acolytes have filed more than 60 civil lawsuits challenging the president's citizenship. None of these suits have gone anywhere...
  • Kerchner v Obama & Congress - U.S. 3rd Circuit Appeal - Appellant's Opening Brief - Filed 1/19/10

    01/20/2010 12:16:07 PM PST · by rxsid · 60 replies · 1,219+ views
    Scribd ^ | 1/20/2010 | Charles F. Kerchner, Jr.
    Kerchner v Obama & Congress - U.S. 3rd Circuit Appeal - Appellant's Opening Brief - Filed 19 Jan 2010 Attorney Mario Apuzzo has filed the Appellant's Opening Brief in the Kerchner et al v Obama et al lawsuit appeal. The Brief was filed with the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia PA. See this link to download and read it: http://www.scribd.com/doc/25461132/Kerchner-v-Obama-Appeal-Appellant-s-Opening-Brief-FILED-2010-01-19 We look forward to the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals reviewing this matter and ordering a trial on the merits as to the Article II Constitutional eligibility of Obama to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief of...
  • Obama an Unconstitutional Illegal President - 20091214 Issue Wash Times Natl Wkly - pg 15

    12/14/2009 9:09:30 PM PST · by circumbendibus · 35 replies · 2,387+ views
    Advertisement ^ | 12/14/09 | Charles Kerchner
    14 Dec 2009: Obama is a usurper. Obama is an unconstitutional illegal putative president. See this 14 Dec 2009 issue of the Washington Times National Weekly edition - pg 15. To be a "natural born Citizen" as is required in the U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, the person must be born in the country to parents who both are Citizens of the country when the child was born. Obama's father was a British Subject when Obama was born in 1961. Obama's father was never a U.S. Citizen nor was he even an immigrant to the USA. We...
  • Appeals briefs scheduled in Obama eligibility challenge

    11/29/2009 7:25:53 PM PST · by Man50D · 67 replies · 3,119+ views
    WorldNetDaily.com ^ | November 29, 2009 | Bob Unruh
    A briefing schedule has been announced by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a case alleging Congress failed in its constitutional duties by refusing to investigate the eligibility of Barack Obama to be president, according to an attorney handling the challenge. Attorney Mario Apuzzo filed the action in January on behalf of Kerchner, Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James Lenormand and Donald H. Nelson Jr. Named as defendants were Barack Hussein Obama II, the U.S., Congress, the Senate, House of Representatives and former Vice President Dick Cheney along with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. The case focuses on the alleged...
  • Attorney Apuzzo appeals Obama citizenship case to Federal 3rd Circuit

    10/27/2009 1:36:59 PM PDT · by Danae · 58 replies · 3,130+ views
    Examiner.com ^ | 10-27-2009 | Dianna Cotter - M. Apuzzo
    From the office of Mario Apuzzo Esq. 27 October 2009, 2:45 P.M. EDT Kerchner et al vs. Obama & Congress et al Lawsuit Decision Appealed to Federal 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia, PA JAMESBURG, NJ – (Oct. 27, 2009) - Attorney Mario Apuzzo of Jamesburg, NJ, today filed an appeal with the Federal Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia, PA, on behalf of plaintiffs Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Lehigh County, PA; Lowell T. Patterson, Burlington County, NJ; Darrell J. LeNormand, Middlesex County, NJ; and Donald H. Nelsen, Jr., Middlesex County, NJ; challenging the recent decision of Judge...
  • Kerchner Eligibility Lawsuit Dismissed on Standing

    10/21/2009 9:02:35 AM PDT · by BuckeyeTexan · 289 replies · 8,250+ views
    U.S. District Court, New Jersey ^ | 10/21/2009 | Judge Jerome B. Simandle
    United States District Court Judge Jerome B. Simandle has dismissed the Kerchner v. Obama lawsuit challenging President Barack H. Obama's eligibility to hold the office of President of the United States. "The Court finds that Plaintiffs Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James LeNormand, and Donald H. Nelsen, Jr. lack standing to pursue their claims and so the Court must grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss." Judge Simandle's full opinion is at the link.
  • Declassified FBI report exposes Communist seedbed for Obama Associates — Part I

    09/27/2009 11:29:47 PM PDT · by Red Steel · 39 replies · 3,090+ views
    The Post & Mail ^ | September 26, 2009 | John Charlton
    The Post & Email has received tonight a decclassified FBI report admitted in evidence in the case brought against W. Mark Felt and Edward S. Miller by President Jimmy Carter’s U.S. Attorney General, Mr. Griffin B. Bell. This document was obtained by an American citizen, who wished to remain anonymous, via a FOIA request. Mr. W. Mark  Felt is none other than the informant who spoke with reporters from the Washington Post, exposing the Watergate Scandal:  who went by the name “Deep Throat” a fact that points to his political neutrality in American politics.What is not know about Mr. Felt...
  • Constitution's "Natural Born Citizen" defined by Vattal's "Law of Nations"

    08/23/2009 8:26:27 PM PDT · by kingattax · 6 replies · 1,463+ views
    The Law of Nations as U.S. Federal Common Law and Not English Common Law Defines What an Article II "Natural Born Citizen" Is -------- Given the profound differences between the citizenship rules associated with the English common law and those connected with American national citizenship, it is evident that the Founders did not use English common law to define what an Article II “natural born Citizen” is but rather used the law of nations for that purpose. To the extent that the English common law was relied upon in the colonies and States, that law was at the time that...
  • Charles Kerchner, Lead Plaintiff v Obama & Congress Lawsuit, Converts Bill Cunningham into a Birther

    08/04/2009 1:12:34 AM PDT · by Red Steel · 6 replies · 1,148+ views
    Atty Mario Apuzzo Blogspot ^ | August 3, 2009 | Charles F. Kerchner, Jr. CDR USNR Retired
    Charles Kerchner, Lead Plaintiff in the Kerchner v Obama & Congress Lawsuit, Converts Talk Show Radio Host Bill Cunningham of 700WLW of Ohio into a Birther. Hi all. I waited 1 1/2 hours on the line but got on during the last hour of the Willie Cunningham Show out of Ohio on Sunday night, 2 Aug 2009. "Willie" Cunningham was challenging people to give him a credible explanation as to how those two birth announcements got into the Honolulu newspapers if Obama was not born in Hawaii. So I decided to try and get on the show to explain it...
  • Plaintiffs' Brief Opposing Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Kerchner v Obama - w/Historical NBC ref)

    07/21/2009 10:25:57 AM PDT · by rxsid · 27 replies · 1,617+ views
    puzo1.blogspot.com ^ | 7/21/2009 | rxsid
    Monday, July 20, 2009 Filing Announcement: Plaintiffs' Brief Opposing Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Filed Filing Announcement: Attorney Mario Apuzzo has filed his opposition to the defendants' motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs' Brief Opposing Defendants' Motion To Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint/Petition Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), and Alternatively to Strike the Complaint Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) and Supporting Cross-Motion for Leave Nunc Pro Tunc to File the Second Amended Complaint/Petition.A must read, it's replete with historical reference to the understanding of what the term Natural Born Citizen means.http://www.scribd.com/doc/17519578/Kerchner-v-Obama-Congress-DOC-34-Plaintiffs-Brief-Opposing-Defendants-Motion-to-Dismiss
  • Plaintiffs Obtain Extension of Time to Answer Obama/Congress Motion to Dismiss (cont -eligibility)

    07/09/2009 8:08:33 AM PDT · by STARWISE · 14 replies · 939+ views
    Defendants, Obama, USA, Congress, Senate, House, Cheney, and Pelosi have filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint/petition. Their main argument is that the plaintiffs do not have standing and that all the defendants have immunity from all of plaintiffs' constitutional claims. The current defense motion to dismiss the complaint/petition was returnable Friday, July 20, 2009. Plaintiffs’ opposition was due by Monday, July 6, 2009. The defendants took over 4 months to file their motion. I was only given 2 weeks to respond. Given the critical importance of this case, the complexity and novelty of the constitutional issues, and the need...
  • Federal Judge Says Obama Lawsuit "Raises Significant Issues" (Challenging Eligibility)

    06/26/2009 5:30:33 PM PDT · by real_patriotic_american · 35 replies · 2,268+ views
    Sonoran News ^ | June 24, 2009 | Linda Bentley
    "A Himalayan Mountain of contradictory evidence" CAMDEN, N.J. – Despite Attorney Mario Apuzzo’s objection to additional time being granted for defendants to respond to the complaint filed on behalf of Charles F. Kerchner questioning President Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility, U.S. District Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider, for the District of New Jersey, granted an extension until no later than June 29. However, while Schneider noted the defendants’ failure to respond in a timely manner was not caused by neglect, he also stated, “Plaintiffs’ complaint raises significant issues necessitating that the named defendants engage competent counsel to represent their interests. Given the...
  • Update on Kerchner et als. v. Obama & Congress et als. (RE: Apuzzo)

    06/09/2009 11:05:24 AM PDT · by rxsid · 10 replies · 1,388+ views
    Mario Apuzzo ^ | 6/9/2009 | rxsid
    Tuesday, June 9, 2009 Activity in Kerchner v Obama & Congress Case - 2nd Extension of time granted to Defendants Activity in Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al Lawsuit - The motion by the defendants for the second extension in time to answer, move, or otherwise respond was granted. Their new deadline is June 29, 2009. You can read the full order at the link below. When you read the order you will see that the court addressed this second request for an extension in great detail in his five page order. I will comment in more...
  • Kerchner v. Obama: Defendants Make Additional Request for More Time to Respond (Obama stalling?)

    04/28/2009 9:54:55 PM PDT · by Frantzie · 40 replies · 1,194+ views
    The Right Side of Life ^ | 4-28-2009 | Phil - Right Side of Life
    Mario Apuzzo, attorney for Plaintiffs in Kerchner v. Obama, made note of the Defendant’s second request for a time extension in this case:
  • New Media Alliance Television (NMATV) Releases Daring Film: “Barak Obama Vs. The Law” Today

    04/05/2009 9:00:19 PM PDT · by nysuperdoodle · 8 replies · 895+ views
    NMATV/ECR ^ | 06 Apr 09 | NMATV
    April 6, 2009 - New Media Alliance Television (NMA TV - www.nmatv.com ) announced the launch today of its daring new film, “Barak Obama vs. The Law.” In the film, controversial Attorneys Dr. Orly Taitz, Mario Apuzzo, and New York City’s WOR talk show host Steve Malzberg make the case questioning Barack Obama and his constitutional eligibility for the presidency of the United States. Bob Parks, NMA TV’s Executive Director and the film’s producer, is quick to point out that “we don’t take any position as to whether President Obama is or is not constitutionally eligible to be President…We do...