[[imposing its rather totalitarian brand of “inclusion” on children and families.]]
By EXCLUDING good people of morals
Strange how people are not happy with who they are so they want to change it. They can change everything about their appearance but they cannot change who they really are.
Sex is a given biological fact.
Gender is a wishful mental construct.
Hope the court is smart enough not to rule against God again......
“...Redifinition...”
Well, first...they’re gonna have to learn to spell “redefinition”.
After all, John Roberts spelled the word “fine” as t-a-x.
When they dig up your bones in a thousand years.....only sexes identified by testing is MALE or FEMALE.
Satanists like to look to the animal kingdom for behavioral examples, especially wolves. I don’t see wolves having sexual identity issues. These Sodomites are making Alistair Crowley look normal.
The slip of this slope we’re on is getting steeper by the day. As others have opined, we are very probably going to soon see a “relaxation” of laws regarding pedophilia, polyamory, bestiality, and the performance of sexual acts in public. I think there was a book that talked about where this all leads....
i thought SCOTUS was done for the year ... so how can they be “set” to rule?
bump
Of course, if the court rules for the plaintiffs, it will take this Congress five minutes to pass a law ADDING “gender identity” to existing law.
I think they better be asking God what He thinks about all this.The Supreme Court of the United States is not the ultimate SUPREME Court . . . there is a Judgement Day coming and every knee will bow and every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord! Ruth Graham was right when she told her husband Billy, “If God doesn’t punish America, He’ll have to apologize to Sodom and Gomorrah.”
The EEOC is part of the executive branch. Can’t Trump force them to drop the appeal?
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
First, only elected lawmakers, not judges, can define the sexes in the constitutional republic imo. Correction, insights welcome. (Career lawmakers let activist justices get away with stealing legislative powers so that judges can legislate from the bench the unconstitutional laws that corrupt lawmakers want to make but not take responsibility for.)
And speaking of lawmakers, patriots are reminded that the states have never amended the Constitution to give Congress the specific power to define sex.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Consider that a previous generation of state sovereignty-respecting Supreme Court justices acknowledged state power recognition of male and female biological sexes when they decided against women suffrage leader Virginia Minor in Minor v. Happersett.
In fact, the 19th Amendment is based on biological sex since it was drafted in response to the Court’s decision Minor v. Happersett.
19th Amendment:
"The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation [emphasis added]."
I wouldn’t be surprised if the corrupt, post-17th Amendment ratification, post-FDR era Supreme Court is looking for an opportunity to politically “amend” the Constitution with politically correct LGBT “rights,” just as it did when it wrongly decided against the sovereign states in Roe v. Wade imo.
In fact, using inappropriate words like "concept" and "implicit" here is what was left of 10th Amendment-protected state sovereignty after FDR’s state sovereignty-ignoring majority justices got finished with it in Wickard v. Filburn.
"10th Amendment: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
"In discussion and decision, the point of reference, instead of being what was "necessary and proper" to the exercise by Congress of its granted power, was often some concept [???] of sovereignty thought to be implicit [??? emphases added] in the status of statehood." —Wickard v. Filburn, 1942
Remember in November 2020!
MAGA! Now KAG!
A tail is a tail no matter if SCROTUS says it’s a leg.
Chromosomes don’t lie.
How law and biomedical definitions are able to differ on this one, I’m not sure.
Roberts scares the heck out of me on these issues.
Kavanaugh, not sure yet.
SCOTUS rules on scrotum, and Americam discourse sinks to a new low.