Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Black holes explained?] Black holes are cosmic factories for building galaxies
The Telegraph ^ | 11/30/2009

Posted on 11/30/2009 7:20:07 PM PST by bruinbirdman

The new research may help explain why large galaxies tend to have super-massive black holes at their cores.

Astronomers have long wanted an answer to the chicken-and-egg question of what comes first, a super-massive black hole or the stars surrounding it.

A new observation of a far away object five billion light years from Earth may now help to solve the riddle.

The object is a quasar, a powerful source of energy believed to mark the location of an active giant black hole.

Nothing that gets close enough to a black hole can escape its powerful gravity. However, material swirling around the edge of a black hole can radiate enormous amounts of energy.

Radiation from the quasar was being emitted when the universe was little more than a third of its present age.

To their surprise, the astronomers found that unlike most quasars, this one was ''naked'' and not situated at the centre of a galaxy. However, there was a companion galaxy close to it creating new stars at a frantic rate equivalent to about 350 suns per year.

The galaxy was effectively ''under fire'' from jets of high energy particles and fast moving gas shooting out of the quasar, the scientists found.

The stream of material was likely to be fuelling star formation in the galaxy, the scientists believe. In effect, the quasar was building its own host galaxy.

At a later stage the quasar was expected to end up at the galaxy's centre.

''The two objects are bound to merge in the future: the quasar is moving at a speed of only a few tens of thousands of kilometres per hour with respect to the companion galaxy and their separation is only about 22,000 light-years,'' said lead scientist Dr David Elbaz, from the CEA research

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: astronomy; catastrophism; science; stringtheory; xplanets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 11/30/2009 7:20:09 PM PST by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Do elves do the work? Are black holes unionized? Inspiring minds want to know.


2 posted on 11/30/2009 7:24:27 PM PST by TigersEye (Sarah Palin 2010 - We Can't Afford To Wait)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

/mark


3 posted on 11/30/2009 7:25:01 PM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
Black holes are cosmic factories for building galaxies


4 posted on 11/30/2009 7:28:44 PM PST by Jagdgewehr (The GOP faithful want me to believe I have only two voting options......"bad" and "worse")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Physics does the work.

To me that means God created them.

Opinions of that differ, but union gnomes or elves are most likely not involved. ;)

5 posted on 11/30/2009 7:28:50 PM PST by allmendream (Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be RE-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

6 posted on 11/30/2009 7:35:44 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (Play the Race Card -- lose the game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

When you consider the energies and vast distances involved it sure makes our problems here look mighty puny by comparison.

Behold his mighty hand...


7 posted on 11/30/2009 7:35:54 PM PST by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
"creating new stars at a frantic rate equivalent to about 350 suns per year"

oh my.... merely trying to imagine such a galaxy-creation process is exhausting.... the energy and mass(es) involved must be stupendous.... well at least "astronomical" in the equations and calculations.
8 posted on 11/30/2009 7:41:51 PM PST by Enchante (Obama to Jihad Terrorists: Come to NYC and Propagate Your Message - I Am Only Too Happy To Help You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Sounds like BS to me. A black hole sweeps up much more matter than whatever matter/energy might be ejected from its accretion disk. Black holes eventually dismantle the galaxies in which they reside. We are circling the drain right now, but it will take a long time to get there. A naked black hole can only assemble a galaxy to reside in by attracting and concentrating matter in its neighborhood.


9 posted on 11/30/2009 8:07:36 PM PST by Stirner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

later


10 posted on 11/30/2009 8:10:09 PM PST by x_plus_one (Those who cannot remember the past, are condemned to have George Santayana quoted at them forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

I thought black holes were places where liberal logic thought went.


11 posted on 11/30/2009 8:11:13 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (The Second Amendment. Don't MAKE me use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stirner

I know of a Black A Hole that thinks he is the King of America.

Is that the same thing?


12 posted on 11/30/2009 8:26:24 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (All Democrats weren't Slave Owners, but all Slave Owners were Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
However, there was a companion galaxy close to it creating new stars at a frantic rate equivalent to about 350 suns per year.

So what you are basically saying is, the time needed for a galaxy to be formed is highly variable and contingent on the activity of many unknown and little-understood phenomena. You'll pardon me, then, if I find a galaxy forming in 24-hours hypothetically possible, given this disclosure.

13 posted on 11/30/2009 8:29:31 PM PST by Anti-Utopian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stirner

The super massive black hole at the center of our galaxy is not “feeding”.


14 posted on 11/30/2009 8:48:13 PM PST by JT1867
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Utopian

No. Galaxy formation is a well understood phenomenon. It really all depends on gravity. Jump up and down. That same force that draws matter together is what makes galaxies. Its as simple as that.


15 posted on 11/30/2009 8:48:13 PM PST by JT1867
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Utopian

“So what you are basically saying is, the time needed for a galaxy to be formed is highly variable and contingent on the activity of many unknown and little-understood phenomena. You’ll pardon me, then, if I find a galaxy forming in 24-hours hypothetically possible, given this disclosure.”

Hypothetically anything is possible, but how probable is it?

Then there’s the question of forming a planet and fully inhabiting it in the 5 days following the ignition of a new star. How probable is that?


16 posted on 11/30/2009 8:57:02 PM PST by AussieJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Either that or rabbit holes.


17 posted on 11/30/2009 9:05:55 PM PST by TigersEye (Sarah Palin 2010 - We Can't Afford To Wait)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Excuse me?!?
18 posted on 11/30/2009 9:14:56 PM PST by notfornothing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Dubai.


19 posted on 11/30/2009 9:21:14 PM PST by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

In the absence of indications of other galaxy-less black holes constructing their new caccoon, this seems more of a one-of.

Mightn’t this instead be a black hole that was at some time in the far past in the center of a conventional galaxy that collided with a second galaxy, and rather then the two black holes merging, this one by chance is ejected to its “current” observed position.


20 posted on 12/01/2009 5:06:24 AM PST by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson