Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What’s a Democratic Party without the Clintons? (by Willie Brown)
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 3/9/2019 | Willie Brown

Posted on 03/11/2019 8:59:00 AM PDT by simpson96

With all the noise surrounding the Democrats’ crowded presidential field, it’s easy to overlook that the Clintons are gone from the scene.

The Clinton era began with a largely unknown Bill Clinton giving a disastrously overlong speech at the 1988 Democratic National Convention. It ended quietly last week with Hillary Clinton telling the world that she was not running again.

In between, the Clintons built and stoked a nationwide network of labor and business figures, minorities and women that was as loyal as any political machine. They weren’t just the face of the party — they were also behind-the-scenes power brokers who got friends elected to offices large and small.

Even when the rank and file mutinied and went for Barack Obama over Hillary in 2008, the Clintons dusted themselves off, remained true to the party and kept the machine tuned for her second run.

Now they are gone, and the voice of the party’s middle has gone with them. There are no high-powered governors or senators to take their place.

The closest thing the party has to an overarching senior figure is Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and she has her hands full managing the House. Obama is busy with his My Brother’s Keeper foundation and is staying out.

Most of the middle-of-the-roaders I know hope former Vice President Joe Biden will take the wheel.

He might. But for all of Biden’s experience and charm, he’s no Clinton.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfchronicle.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: 2020election; arkansas; botox; california; delaware; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; election2020; howardschultz; joebiden; kamalaharris; mediawingofthednc; nancypelosi; partisanmediashills; presstitutes; sanfrancisco; sanfrannan; smearmachine; starbucks; williebrown

1 posted on 03/11/2019 8:59:00 AM PDT by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: simpson96

the Clintons are gone from the scene?

You really believe that Willie?

I mean really?..... .......................


2 posted on 03/11/2019 9:00:12 AM PDT by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

The Democratic Party without the Clinton’s is a party that has dropped the pretense.

They have gone full socialist.

At least Slick Willy tried to act like he cared about Americans.

Democrats today are only concerned with importing enough foreigners to cement their control.


3 posted on 03/11/2019 9:02:33 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

With these two Willies gone, the party is less cocky.


4 posted on 03/11/2019 9:05:36 AM PDT by o-n-money (n)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

I cannot imagine how removing two t*rds from the septic tank changes the stink in any discernible way.


5 posted on 03/11/2019 9:06:20 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

The Clinton’s knew the secret to winning, you can win with less than 40% of the vote if you have a 3rd party candidate. Had Trump ran as a 3rd party, she would have had it in the bag. She wanted Trump to run, but he went Republican, thus no 3rd party to drain the votes. The brain numbs were her biggest supporters which gave her the chance to win it. Sorry it didn’t work out, there was no Perot. Ahhh , but there is a Kasich? Kanishes? Some name like that who delivered mail?


6 posted on 03/11/2019 9:07:37 AM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (What is earned is treasured, what is free is worth what you paid for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Willie Brown; laying down more cover for his Sweetheart Kamala!

A POX on both their houses! *SPIT*


7 posted on 03/11/2019 9:08:05 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin ( "Why can't you be more like Lloyd Braun?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

We sure are gonna miss the awww shucks racist guy, and the shrill worst nightmare shrieky mother in law.

We wont know that they are really gone until we go a year or two without finding people who commit suicide by shooting themselves in the back of the head with a shotgun, twice


8 posted on 03/11/2019 9:08:35 AM PDT by dsrtsage (For Leftists, World History starts every day at breakfast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dsrtsage

Rapist guy, not racist guy, though suppose both are true


9 posted on 03/11/2019 9:09:23 AM PDT by dsrtsage (For Leftists, World History starts every day at breakfast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
The Democratic Party without the Clinton’s is a party that has dropped the pretense. They have gone full socialist. At least Slick Willy tried to act like he cared about Americans.

You've nailed it. They are subject to recrimination by the radical young guns. Bill for not imposing socialism when he had the chance, Hillary for losing to the EEEEEVIL monster Trump.


10 posted on 03/11/2019 9:18:23 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

He might. But for all of Biden’s experience and charm, he’s no Clinton.


Um. What?


11 posted on 03/11/2019 9:22:13 AM PDT by ConservativeWarrior (Fall down 7 times, stand up 8. - Japanese proverb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

“What’s a Democratic Party without the Clintons?”

Who do we have underneath Hood #2?


12 posted on 03/11/2019 9:52:44 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Yep, that same Willie Brown: Two-term mayor of San Francisco, and Kamala Harris’ paramour.


13 posted on 03/11/2019 9:55:10 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Even when the rank and file mutinied and went for Barack Obama over Hillary in 2008, the Clintons dusted themselves off, remained true to the party and kept the machine tuned for her second run.

Now they are gone, and the voice of the party’s middle has gone with them. There are no high-powered governors or senators to take their place.

The closest thing the party has to an overarching senior figure is Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and she has her hands full managing the House. Obama is busy with his My Brother’s Keeper foundation and is staying out.

Most of the middle-of-the-roaders I know hope former Vice President Joe Biden will take the wheel.
IOW, he's going to endorse Joe Biden, but strongly encourage Biden to pick Kamala Harris for a running mate.

14 posted on 03/11/2019 10:04:26 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (and btw -- https://www.gofundme.com/for-rotator-cuff-repair-surgery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Who would have thought that it would be “better?”

More importantly, who in the hell could have imagined that it was the Clintons holding the Democrats dweebs closest to the center?!? LOL!


15 posted on 03/11/2019 10:11:54 AM PDT by ExTxMarine (Diversity is tolerance; diverse points of views will not be tolerated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

“What’s a Democratic Party without the Clintons?”

FUBAR as usual.


16 posted on 03/11/2019 10:16:11 AM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft
She wanted Trump to run

Cuz she "knew" that no self-respecting conservative would vote for a twice-divorced womanizer. She got the media to play him up and he got millions in free advertising, much to the chagrin of the other 16 Republican candidates.

But then she lost. Never conceded. Had to apologize to Obummer cuz all his friends were not going to be back in the White House.

Now, they are trying to figure out who to rely on to take back the Big House; The Kamala-Toe or The Faux-Injun or The Cory-Booger or The OldMan-Kid-Kisser or The Irish-FakeMexican?

Oh, what a web that is weaved when they work to deceive. Or something like that.

17 posted on 03/11/2019 10:23:05 AM PDT by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

It looks to me like the party wants to move from Clinton cronyism to socialism. Such a choice.


18 posted on 03/11/2019 11:15:09 AM PDT by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

Never conceded.


Transcript of Hillary’s concession speech

https://www.vox.com/2016/11/9/13570328/hillary-clinton-concession-speech-full-transcript-2016-presidential-election


19 posted on 03/11/2019 11:20:34 AM PDT by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Willie Brown: “Kamala can’t cook but sure could make a banana cream”


20 posted on 03/11/2019 7:19:02 PM PDT by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson