Skip to comments.
A-Bomb Victims Stage Rally in Hiroshima Against U.S. Nuclear Warship
ap.tbo ^
| October 29, 2005
| AP
Posted on 10/29/2005 8:13:55 PM PDT by ncountylee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-230 next last
To: ncountylee
If they hadn't started it we wouldn't have had to use nuclear weapons to end it.
2
posted on
10/29/2005 8:14:37 PM PDT
by
COEXERJ145
(http://www.navyfield.com)
To: ncountylee
Better put some ice on that.
3
posted on
10/29/2005 8:14:50 PM PDT
by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: ncountylee
The older carrier is Kitty Hawk. Does anyone know which Nimitz is going there?
4
posted on
10/29/2005 8:15:39 PM PDT
by
neodad
(Rule Number 1: Be Armed)
To: COEXERJ145
i thought we used atomic weapons not nuclear weapons. Besides it's pronounced nucular any way.
5
posted on
10/29/2005 8:16:39 PM PDT
by
willyd
(Good Fences Make Good Neighbors)
To: ncountylee
The SOB's wouldn't be a nation today without our help and without living under our nuclear umbrella. Let 'em vent all they want, wait until someone attacks them and see what happens.
6
posted on
10/29/2005 8:17:23 PM PDT
by
ConorMacNessa
(HM/2 USN - 3rd Bn. Fifth Marines RVN 1969)
To: COEXERJ145
None of the still-living victims of the nukes had anything whatsoever to do with making any decisions to go to war.
These people are simply bearing witness ~
7
posted on
10/29/2005 8:18:11 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
(/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again? How'bout a double sarcasm for this one)
To: ncountylee
These people should shut up and take care of their 3 armed, one-eyed kids.
8
posted on
10/29/2005 8:18:16 PM PDT
by
ExpatGator
(Progressivism: A polyp on the colon politic.)
To: ncountylee
Our carriers are safer than some of the reactors the Japanese are running, so what's the big whoop?
9
posted on
10/29/2005 8:18:27 PM PDT
by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: ncountylee
In the meantime I will be protesting the ch****sh** bombing of Pearl Harbor, an unprovoked attack i might add. Who has the moral high ground here?
10
posted on
10/29/2005 8:18:29 PM PDT
by
BipolarBob
(Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I didn't see it in my rearview mirror)
To: BipolarBob
Who has the moral high ground?
I do.
You don't.
11
posted on
10/29/2005 8:19:27 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
(/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again? How'bout a double sarcasm for this one)
To: ncountylee
About 80 people -80? Heck, we had to go through crowds of protestors bigger than that at Yokosuka back in the 70's.
12
posted on
10/29/2005 8:19:42 PM PDT
by
WildTurkey
(True Creationism makes intelligent design actually seem intelligent)
To: ncountylee
"....About 80 people - many of them victims of the 1945 U.S. atomic bomb attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki - rallied against plans announced Friday by the U.S. Navy to deploy a Nimitz-class nuclear-powered aircraft carrier in Japan, said Kazutoshi Kajikawa, who heads the Hiroshima Peace Movement Center."
80 people? Sound like Japan will soon be OVERTHROWN..(rolling eyes)
To: ncountylee
There will always be people like this in Japan, just like we have people like Cindy Sheehan here in the U.S.
I was on the Indy when we visited a port in Hokkaido. We were warned that there would be protestors, not to talk to them, not allow ourselves to be provoked. When we pulled into port the protestors were there as advertised 500 strong.....standing behind about 15,000 people that wanted a tour of the ship, all waving Japanese and American flags.
14
posted on
10/29/2005 8:21:42 PM PDT
by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: muawiyah
~ None of the still-living victims of the nukes had anything whatsoever to do with making any decisions to go to war. These people are simply bearing witness ~
I agree, they have cause to protest. Nukes and people are a really bad combo. Particularly for the people who survive.
15
posted on
10/29/2005 8:22:42 PM PDT
by
Danae
(Most Liberals don't drink the Kool-aide, they are licking the powder right out of the packet.)
To: ncountylee
Well, given their NK and PRC neighbors, it would do them good to go nuclear themselves. When those NKers shot a rocket over Japan, it was supposed to arouse them from slumber.
16
posted on
10/29/2005 8:22:43 PM PDT
by
GSlob
To: muawiyah
Bearing witness to what? The wages of a totalitarian regime that put them into a war they had no prayer of winning. We are not the bad guys here.
17
posted on
10/29/2005 8:22:55 PM PDT
by
ConorMacNessa
(HM/2 USN - 3rd Bn. Fifth Marines RVN 1969)
To: ncountylee
I wonder if these "enlightened" activists would stage the same type of protest if a nuclear Iran threatened Japan in the same way that Iran threatened Israel lately.
18
posted on
10/29/2005 8:23:07 PM PDT
by
kromike
To: Warthogtjm
You miss the whole point.
One of the more obvious things we have all learned about nukes is that their scale is vastly beyond our ability to imagine.
19
posted on
10/29/2005 8:25:53 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
(/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again? How'bout a double sarcasm for this one)
To: ncountylee
And these nuclear engineering Einsteins think the carrier will just go off and blow up? They have as much technical depth as the US soccer moms that don't want "radioactive electricty" coming out the outlet if from a NUCLEAR power plant................
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-230 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson