Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newly Revealed Evidence-Madison Admin Req. Citizen Parents - Native-Born Persons - U.S. Citizenship.
naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com ^ | 12/28/2011 | Leo Donofrio

Posted on 12/28/2011 5:34:17 PM PST by rxsid

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-197 next last

1 posted on 12/28/2011 5:34:22 PM PST by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LucyT; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; Nepeta; Bikkuri; ...
Ping!

"THE PUBLIUS ENIGMA: Newly Revealed Evidence Establishes That President James Madison’s Administration Required Citizen Parentage To Qualify Native-Born Persons For U.S. Citizenship."

2 posted on 12/28/2011 5:35:20 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

sfl


3 posted on 12/28/2011 5:39:54 PM PST by phockthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Leo Ping


4 posted on 12/28/2011 5:42:13 PM PST by simplesimon (You are entitled to your own opinions but not your own "facts"...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Great find! Unfortunately I don’t think it will be of any help in our current situation.

If it can be utilyzed to prevent occurrences in the future, that will be all for the good.


5 posted on 12/28/2011 5:43:21 PM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS U.S.A. PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Great find and excellent work!

Congrats!


6 posted on 12/28/2011 5:45:05 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Thanks for all you do. Can’t wait to read the book when published.


7 posted on 12/28/2011 5:50:47 PM PST by hoosiermama (We need more Jobs.....Steve Jobs....entrepreneurs and creators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

The Courts,Including the Supreme Court are not going to touch this case with a ten foot poll.Afterall the Ninth Circuit has already said that the American People have No standing in Bringing these cases against Obama.

Unfortunately the Government will have standing in bringing all of these devious laws into being and using the Point of a gun or the threat of imprisonment to enforce them on us.

This country is in so much trouble.


8 posted on 12/28/2011 5:59:33 PM PST by puppypusher (The World is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
So anchor babies were not qualified for citizenship.

This means a law was created to naturalize anchor babies... because they were not natural born citizens.

It also means that the NBC clause must be amended to qualify Obama for the presidency. We better get moving on that amendment.

9 posted on 12/28/2011 5:59:43 PM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

“The whole story cannot be understood by way of online searches. The internet is barren on this case. Some of the necessary information isn’t even available in the Library of Congress or National Archives. “

I have read various articles of the years which indicated that those ‘in government’ have been removing any references or legal decisions that interfere with ‘current liberal understanding’ of ‘the law’.


10 posted on 12/28/2011 6:05:17 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

God bless you Leo!


11 posted on 12/28/2011 6:07:29 PM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
I have read various articles of over the years... (oops)
12 posted on 12/28/2011 6:08:25 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
Which just ruins it for the rest of us who want to believe the 14th Amendment did not really create a new standard but rather restated an older one that did not give citizenship to anchor babies.

This discovery makes it look like there really was a previous standard of not doing so and that it was changed by the 14th.

13 posted on 12/28/2011 6:12:54 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

The law doesn’t apply to Bambi — he is one of Holder’s people and Pelosi’s people.


14 posted on 12/28/2011 6:14:35 PM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Got it. An obscure newspaper article overrides multiple Supreme Court decisions, not to mention constitutional amendments.

Glad to have that cleared up.


15 posted on 12/28/2011 6:18:02 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid; amom

Interesting find...


16 posted on 12/28/2011 6:23:09 PM PST by TEXOKIE (... and Merry Christmas to all FREEPERS EVERYWHERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

You don’t have any idea of what you’re talking about. Minor vs Hapersett established legal scotus precedent that the natural born citizen definition = two citizen parents & born of this soil.

Freerepublic is such a tremendous resource and place of learning- we truly are blessed for what Jim has created her.

PS to everyone: am I the only freeper that looks forward to what Spaulding posts on this topic? Hope he chimes in on this one, it looks to be a great find.


17 posted on 12/28/2011 6:24:45 PM PST by mills044 (Don't Tread on Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Laughable.


18 posted on 12/28/2011 6:29:27 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Gimme that old time fossil fuel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

I apologize; in re-reading my response, I came off pretty harsh. I just get frustrated over the issue of whether this has been ruled on or not. It clearly has, so much so that nefarious forces have seen fit to scrub online resources for the SCOTUS cases in question.

No offense intended.


19 posted on 12/28/2011 6:32:33 PM PST by mills044 (Don't Tread on Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
Got it. An obscure newspaper article overrides multiple Supreme Court decisions, not to mention constitutional amendments.

Got it. Supreme Court decisions Clearly violating the Constitution and later "reversed," with or without Constitutional Amendments, prove that Supreme Court decisions are permanent and inviolate.

Got it.

20 posted on 12/28/2011 6:55:52 PM PST by Publius6961 (My world was lovely, until it was taken over by parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-197 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson