Posted on 06/21/2015 9:11:15 AM PDT by PROCON
Bingo!! The proverbial 47% are always nearby.
I wouldn't underestimate the idiocy of the 47% "american" voting public. MO would have a massive turnout in the black, asian, jew and mexican sectors.
Make no mistake, she'd be a formidable opponent for a sheepish, non constitutional RINO candidate like a John McCain or Mitt Romney.
I LOVE our Senior Freepers; they bring so much to the table! I miss my Grandpas so much - will you be my Honorary Freeper Grandpa, Willibeaux? :)
A LOT of us caught that. 0bama is SUCH a putz!
Nineteen months to go! Will America Survive? It’s not looking so good...
There is no 47%, that is why Romney, nor you, nor anyone, could ever define it.
McCain and Romney aren’t running, and black turnout, all democrat turn out, was much lower in 2012, because everyone is tired of Obama, only the pro-choice ad running Mitt Romney, could have lost that election.
No one wants to elect the second black in a row, the wife of Obama, who has never even held office, and who would be a terrible campaigner to the general public.
She would greatly depress the democrat vote, and increase republican turnout to great levels.
It would be a huge landslide against her.
He seems to have forgotten Slick Willie the Impeached.
First since FDR to win back to back what the hell is he talking about... Clinton won back to back
Does the ever popular “Bill” “Clinton” not count for back-to-back Democrat victories because he did not reach a majority either time?
Bill is going to be ticked off that he has been forgotten so quickly.
Told a liberal ‘friend’ right before little-o’s first election: What about your children? He will have torn apart the country before leaving office. This is the last email you’ll be receiving from this address.” She still didn’t get it, even making some condescending remarks. 3-4 years ago she wrote, apologizing. HA! Silence from this end. Liberals, of course, know everything and can be told nothing. They prefer to educate themselves at the school of hard knocks.
Good morning and a Happy Fathers Day to your family’s grand poo-bah from the soggy state of Texas.
Keep the faith....
“Keep the faith....”
I will! :)
Keep telling yourself that - I hope it makes you feel better - by next year at this time, Obama's policies will have swelled the 47% to 51% and Marxist/Leninist candidates will win handily.
"Increase republican turnout" (?) With who as the standard bearer? With whom to overcome the votes of the entitlements class? -
The fundamental transformation that Obama promised, it happened despite two midterm wipeouts for him and his party. If the Obama voters can turn out in the midterms like they turn out for general elections . . . they got it made in the shade FRiend
Keep telling yourself that - I hope it makes you feel better - by next year at this time, Obama's policies will have swelled the 47% to 51% and Marxist/Leninist candidates will win handily.
"Increase republican turnout" (?) With who as the standard bearer? With whom to overcome the votes of the entitlements class? -
The fundamental transformation that Obama promised, it happened despite two midterm wipeouts for him and his party. If the Obama voters can turn out in the midterms like they turn out for general elections . . . they got it made in the shade FRiend
Stopped reading right there...
Anybody that historically illiterate isn't worth reading.
Bill Clinton ring a bell...?
I notice that you couldn’t define who the 47% was, that’s OK, neither could the idiot who made it up.
I hope it makes you feel better to avoid actually thinking about about the 2016 election.
BHO’s agenda has happened because the spineless, unmanned Repubics have committed treason by not defending the constitution. I am afraid the only answer now will have to be “discussed” in the streets.
Agreed. I want more than a bit of entertainment and emotional satisfaction out of this next election.
Try to wrap you small brain around that beginning of the definition.
. . . and troll is defined by most of your posts but particularly the baseless excursions into ad hominism (look it up)
Your sure went to the nonsensical personal attacks quickly, but you still haven’t explained what Romney’s definition was of his goofy, 47% statement.
Your attempt was nonsensical, you went off rambling so much that it doesn’t make any sense at all.
Can you tell us who that 47% of America is, who are not working or fully employed, yet also have a non-western world view, and who are not Jews, or Christians?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.