Posted on 11/03/2016 7:11:32 AM PDT by ResisTyr
Internet data mining expert Clif High says the “naked data” on the Internet shows Trump winning the 2016 Presidential election by a “landslide.” High explains, “You can do a search on YouTube that brings back a list of primary speeches by both candidates. I am not talking about Fred Smith’s copy of a video he made of Trump. I am talking about a speech took officially of Trump, and they released it officially. If you take just those, you can see you’ve got Hillary Clinton on one side with 2,165 views, and Trump on the other side with 775,653 views. So, that is not anecdotal. This is a very crude level of statistical analysis, but it is nonetheless statistical analysis, and it is very pointed because it is extremely self-selecting. There is nobody watching you when you choose to watch something on YouTube. So, there is no peer pressure or external person polling you. . . . It’s what I call a very naked data set because there is no pressure on an emotional level on people.”
(Excerpt) Read more at usawatchdog.com ...
Not a good analysis. Democrats don’t read... too high.
From the results of recent presidential elections, a general conclusion was reached that the Democratic and Republican parties start with a default electoral vote count of about 190 each. In this scenario, the twelve competitive states are Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Minnesota, Ohio, Iowa, Virginia, Florida, Michigan, Nevada, Colorado, and North Carolina. However, this projection was not specific to any particular election cycle, and assumed similar levels of support for both parties.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swing_state
If you give the Republican every consensus toss-up state on the map right now - Ohio, Florida, North Carolina, Nevada, Iowa, Arizona and half of Maine, that only gets Mr Trump to 268 electoral votes - two shy of the 270 necessary to put him in the White House.
That’s the “Clinton firewall” staring Mr Trump in the face. He either has to win Pennsylvania or New Hampshire - which haven’t budged from Mrs Clinton’s column despite heavy efforts on both sides - or find a new way around the electoral blockade.
And so the Trump campaign is unrolling a $25m television advertising campaign that includes Wisconsin, New Mexico and Michigan. And the man himself travelled to western Wisconsin for the first time since April, giving a closing-argument stump speech to a packed crowd of around 3,000, with at least 1,000 more left outside.
http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37852475
Buy lottery tickets. You are on a winning streak for another week!
I think his orders of magnitude is in levels of interest. And, the votes are spread over the country, not in specific states. He also inclined that the ‘Deep State’ counts the votes and rigs the polls to influence the votes. Reading between the lines, it seems that Trumps wins the votes but maybe not the election. Maybe I didn’t hear him correctly.
He is not picking apart his wording. There are specific definitions for the words he is using. A person in his position should know those definitions.
It would be similar to a sports guy saying he predicted the Steelers would beat the Ravens “by 4 runs” this weekend. Even if I thought the Steelers would win, I probably wouldn’t listen to the guy that said it.
Your link is now forbidden, and not accessible.
However, when I did access it, it had North Dakota going for Hitlery.
This will never happen, repeat, this will absolutely never happen. Period. North Dakota has never been considered a close state. That alone makes this site pure bullshit.
If they wanted some credibility, they would have had the battle ground states carry Hitlery, that, combined with all the MSM lying, would have made it believable.
But when you take pure red states, and have them carry Hitlery, only a moron would believe it. Who ever made this up uses very little thought.
Now if that does happen, then it will be easy to fight all the fraud. Being a red state, there is more honesty. Also, we use paper ballots, a simple recount would take care of this state. Others similarly too.
You ignored the fact that Wisconsin is polling Trump as is MH and Pennsylvania
Go back to bed or go fishing
Is there a way for this software to be stopped ... if found credible.
Looks like some one else is trying to sound important without following any of the latest polls
Go fishing
I don’t trust the polls.
Measuring YouTube views is not the same thing as measuring votes. There are plenty of reasons people would watch Trump videos apart from wanting to vote for him. Just as there are reasons Clinton voters wouldn’t be motivated to watch her videos. And that’s just the minority of people that watch any of them.
That is what soros said sometime around the beginning of the race. “Trump will win the popular vote, but hillary will win the EV.”
I think he meant to use the term ‘Bigly’.
The difference is that Trump has enthusiastic supporters who enjoy listening to him. Even Hillary’s husband won’t listen to her, and he is praying she’ll win so he can play with interns again. You cannot draw the usual conclusions from this year’s data mining.
Unfriggingbelievable.
If Soros can’t apply enough scaling to the machine to overcome the popular vote margin, then the EC vote could be an order of magnitude bigger.
Humphrey lost by an order of magnitude if I recall.
Your point, however, that it should be taken with a grain of salt, still stands.
What he’s right about is that there is a several order of magnitude difference in enthusiasm. It’s a massive difference. What he’s missing is the scale factor that says, “Every 10 percent difference in enthusiasm translates to X popular votes and Y electoral votes.”
If he went that step, sat back, and gauged his accuracy, he could make himself a lot of money next year, and put a lot of political consultants and pollsters out of business.
Sorry everyone who replied...I was not home tonight.
I have *no* if this is bogus, real or what.
However, I saved copies of all it, including YouTubes, just in case.
Whatever it is/isn’t, lots of people are now aware of it.
If it *is* real, it will be much harder to get away with and if it’s not, it will be an amusing anecdote after Trump wins.
:)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.