Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

E Jean Carroll MIGHT want to hold off spending her winnings based on BOMBSHELL from Trump's defense team
Twitchy.com ^ | 1/30.2024 | Sam J.

Posted on 01/30/2024 6:56:55 AM PST by NetAddicted

Full disclosure, we typically take bombshells like this with a grain of salt because this is the sort of story that definitely will get lots of clicks and taps and often times, if something sounds like it's too good to be true it probably is.

However, coming from Byron York? Yeah ... this is worth covering.

Take a look at THIS:

Trump lawyer says defense just learned that E Jean Carroll judge was once 'mentor' to Carroll's lawyer. 'This issue is particularly concerning since Plaintiff’s other lead counsel, Shawn Crowley, served as Your Honor’s law clerk, and we were previously advised that Your Honor… pic.twitter.com/H1Urfb69QL

— Byron York (@ByronYork) January 30, 2024

From the rest of York's post:

This issue is particularly concerning since Plaintiff’s other lead counsel, Shawn Crowley, served as Your Honor’s law clerk, and we were previously advised that Your Honor co-officiated her wedding.'

Officiated. Her. Wedding.

Sounds like they've not only worked together but know one another very well.

But there's no conflict here. Nope. None at all.

ARE YOU KIDDING US?!

One big incestuous cabal that is centered in dC, NYC and La with branches in other major leftist cities. This is why they have no shame or fear of their actions, they control the media and the courts and bureaucracy. This must all end

— Norseman27 (@Norseman2772) January 30, 2024

As George Carlin once said, 'It's one big club and YOU ain't in it!'

Seriously.

Her bragging about how she's going to spend her money with Rachel Maddow last night makes more and more sense.

This case is getting reversed on appeal. The judge and the lawyers should also be disbarred

— Dave (Your Majesty)🇺🇸🇮🇱🐶🟦 (@dweinberger66) January 30, 2024

We're not holding our breath for any actual consequences for the judge or lawyers but looking at what appears to be a pretty big conflict of interest ... not sure how this can stand. It very well could (we are hardly experts) but guys, wow.

Not good.

I'm sure it's nothing

— not important enough to impeach (@MarkMazman) January 30, 2024

Totally.

They've got this time or something.

======================================================================

Related:

E. Jean Carroll BRAGS to Rachel Maddow About HOW She's Going to Spend Trump's Money (WATCH Her Attorney)

She Has LOST It! LOL! Listen to What Nancy Pelosi YELLS at Protesters Outside of Her SF Home (Video)

William Shatner Calls Out Woke EU Harpies Trying to Censor Star Trek Opening Monologue as Only HE Can

And THERE It Is! James Woods OWNS the Libs by Sharing Image of the VERY 1st Liberal and ROFL (Pic)

======================================================================

Recommended (current Twitchy articles):

E. Jean Carroll BRAGS to Rachel Maddow About HOW She's Going to Spend Trump's Money (WATCH Her Attorney)

New York Times Discovers Southerners Have Gas Stations With Restaurants Attached

Must've Skipped History: Pope Francis Says Marxism, Christianity Have a 'Common Mission'

OOPS! Joy Reid's 'Hot Mic Incident' About Biden Differs From MSNBC's Usual Hackery (She Apologized)

Mark Cuban Admits to Violating Anti-Discrimination Law, Promptly Gets Owned by EEOC Commissioner (Update)

New Republic: MAGA Is Tanking Border Deal In Anticipation of 'Full-Blown Ethonationalist Savagery'

TRENDING ON TOWNHALL MEDIA:

1 E. Jean Carroll Delivered the Sound Bite That Could Win Trump the Election

3 Federal Government Failure Could Save the Nation


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: defense; ejeancarroll; trump; trumpdefense; trumppersecution; twitchy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: NetAddicted

“Shawn...served as a law clerk to the Honorable Lewis A. Kaplan of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.”

https://www.kaplanhecker.com/our-talent/shawn-g-crowley


21 posted on 01/30/2024 8:00:42 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Bkmk BINGO
“off the rails” for $100, Alex


22 posted on 01/30/2024 8:06:02 AM PST by ptsal (Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

“A lawyer should not knowingly misstate, distort, or improperly exaggerate any fact or opinion nor permit the lawyer’s silence or inaction to mislead anyone.”

https://www.floridabar.org/prof/regulating-professionalism/presources002/

But the client should not be able to deny an accusation in public personally.


23 posted on 01/30/2024 8:06:36 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

Trump is Emmitt Till. Both were lynched for offending a white woman. NY should be eal proud of its Jim Crow justice system.


24 posted on 01/30/2024 8:08:17 AM PST by DeplorablePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

“Correct, BUT, nothing will happen. Our judicial system has gone off the rails.”

***********

Ain’t that the truth! The blindfold has been torn off of Lady Justice and her scales are weighing the gold.


25 posted on 01/30/2024 8:08:26 AM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

“Counsel shall admonish all persons at counsel table that gestures, facial expressions, audible comments, or the like, as manifestations of approval or disapproval during the testimony of witnesses or at any other time, absolutely are prohibited.”

https://www.floridabar.org/prof/regulating-professionalism/presources002/


26 posted on 01/30/2024 8:08:45 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT

Haley is all about blind ambition. Its clear that she is willing to do virtually anything to get elected.

I hope she gets crushed in SC.


27 posted on 01/30/2024 8:12:39 AM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Can't stand her.

So, you have a problem with dual citizen Indian anchor baby Nimarata, child of non-citizens Ajit Singh Randhawa and Raj Kaur Randhawa?

28 posted on 01/30/2024 8:12:43 AM PST by fireman15 (Irritating people are the grit from which we fashion our pearl. I provide the grit. You're Welcome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

“Is it okay for a lawyer to be personal friends with a judge?
Yes, but if the lawyer appears in front of the judge, both have to tell the opposing counsel that they are personally acquainted.”

https://www.quora.com/Would-it-be-a-conflict-of-interest-if-a-lawyer-was-personal-friends-with-a-judge


29 posted on 01/30/2024 8:13:55 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

Wally Cox? Wow you’re aging yourself. 🤣


30 posted on 01/30/2024 8:18:20 AM PST by redangus ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

Not a bombshell, as this was known weeks ago

BUT it is more evidence of how/why NY City, and America’s courts, are sooooo corrupt and incestuous.


31 posted on 01/30/2024 8:20:14 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeplorablePaul

“Emmitt Till”

Should such a person be denied the right to state his innocence?

He didn’t deny it. He must be guilty. Get some rope.

Should a person not have the effective right to question a verdict?

It seems to me that a federal court created by Congress can’t be used to violate Amendment I.


32 posted on 01/30/2024 8:22:56 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

HOME


33 posted on 01/30/2024 8:25:07 AM PST by sauropod (The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than cowardly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44

They know each other, they have lunches and dinners with each other.

That, in and of itself, is not evidence of a conflict of interests. If it were happening while a particular case was in trial, THAT would be a problem. But in my 38 years of experience as a litigator and a judge, the vast majority of the judges I know will avoid or shut down ANY ex parte communication on a case currently before them.


34 posted on 01/30/2024 8:29:32 AM PST by jagusafr ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

Section 8 - Freedom of speech and press; criminal prosecutions for libel

Every citizen may freely speak, write and publish his or her sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right; and no law shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech or of the press. In all criminal prosecutions or indictments for libels, the truth may be given in evidence to the jury; and if it shall appear to the jury that the matter charged as libelous is true, and was published with good motives and for justifiable ends, the party shall be acquitted; and the jury shall have the right to determine the law and the fact.

Universal Citation: NY Const art I § 8

https://law.justia.com/constitution/new-york/article-i/section-8/

I do not think it is an abuse to claim innocence. I would not find against Andrew Cuomo for his denials even if he was sued over nursing home deaths or interactions with females.


35 posted on 01/30/2024 8:31:13 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Jeran-Carrol-tweets-0
36 posted on 01/30/2024 8:32:51 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted
Sexual assault victims don’t usually respond like this. — Andy Ngô

↑This↑

37 posted on 01/30/2024 8:36:02 AM PST by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

10% Judge?


38 posted on 01/30/2024 8:36:02 AM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

I think the judge is so leftist that if Carroll’s lead counsel was the judge’s ex-wife the judge would have done what he has done.

The judge has a serious case of TDS.


39 posted on 01/30/2024 8:38:00 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted
How did they not determine this before the second verdict?
40 posted on 01/30/2024 8:38:44 AM PST by mykroar ("It's Not the Nature of the Evidence; It's the Seriousness of the Charge." - El Rushbo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson