Posted on 01/30/2024 6:56:55 AM PST by NetAddicted
“Shawn...served as a law clerk to the Honorable Lewis A. Kaplan of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.”
https://www.kaplanhecker.com/our-talent/shawn-g-crowley
Bkmk BINGO
“off the rails” for $100, Alex
“A lawyer should not knowingly misstate, distort, or improperly exaggerate any fact or opinion nor permit the lawyer’s silence or inaction to mislead anyone.”
https://www.floridabar.org/prof/regulating-professionalism/presources002/
But the client should not be able to deny an accusation in public personally.
Trump is Emmitt Till. Both were lynched for offending a white woman. NY should be eal proud of its Jim Crow justice system.
“Correct, BUT, nothing will happen. Our judicial system has gone off the rails.”
***********
Ain’t that the truth! The blindfold has been torn off of Lady Justice and her scales are weighing the gold.
“Counsel shall admonish all persons at counsel table that gestures, facial expressions, audible comments, or the like, as manifestations of approval or disapproval during the testimony of witnesses or at any other time, absolutely are prohibited.”
https://www.floridabar.org/prof/regulating-professionalism/presources002/
Haley is all about blind ambition. Its clear that she is willing to do virtually anything to get elected.
I hope she gets crushed in SC.
So, you have a problem with dual citizen Indian anchor baby Nimarata, child of non-citizens Ajit Singh Randhawa and Raj Kaur Randhawa?
“Is it okay for a lawyer to be personal friends with a judge?
Yes, but if the lawyer appears in front of the judge, both have to tell the opposing counsel that they are personally acquainted.”
Wally Cox? Wow you’re aging yourself. 🤣
Not a bombshell, as this was known weeks ago
BUT it is more evidence of how/why NY City, and America’s courts, are sooooo corrupt and incestuous.
“Emmitt Till”
Should such a person be denied the right to state his innocence?
He didn’t deny it. He must be guilty. Get some rope.
Should a person not have the effective right to question a verdict?
It seems to me that a federal court created by Congress can’t be used to violate Amendment I.
HOME
They know each other, they have lunches and dinners with each other.
That, in and of itself, is not evidence of a conflict of interests. If it were happening while a particular case was in trial, THAT would be a problem. But in my 38 years of experience as a litigator and a judge, the vast majority of the judges I know will avoid or shut down ANY ex parte communication on a case currently before them.
Section 8 - Freedom of speech and press; criminal prosecutions for libel
Every citizen may freely speak, write and publish his or her sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right; and no law shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech or of the press. In all criminal prosecutions or indictments for libels, the truth may be given in evidence to the jury; and if it shall appear to the jury that the matter charged as libelous is true, and was published with good motives and for justifiable ends, the party shall be acquitted; and the jury shall have the right to determine the law and the fact.
Universal Citation: NY Const art I § 8
https://law.justia.com/constitution/new-york/article-i/section-8/
I do not think it is an abuse to claim innocence. I would not find against Andrew Cuomo for his denials even if he was sued over nursing home deaths or interactions with females.
↑This↑
10% Judge?
I think the judge is so leftist that if Carroll’s lead counsel was the judge’s ex-wife the judge would have done what he has done.
The judge has a serious case of TDS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.