Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Actor (Robert) Duvall enters battle to save Va. battlefield
www.breitbart.com ^ | May 4, 2009 | STEVE SZKOTAK

Posted on 05/04/2009 11:12:18 AM PDT by Publius804

Actor Duvall enters battle to save Va. battlefield

By STEVE SZKOTAK

LOCUST GROVE, Va. (AP) - Academy Award-winning actor Robert Duvall has fired a verbal salvo against plans to build a Wal-Mart Supercenter near a Virginia Civil War battlefield where Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee first fought the Union's Ulysses S. Grant.

Duvall, who is a descendant of Lee, said he will help preservationists in "chasing out" the retailer from a site near the Wilderness Battlefield.

At a news conference on Monday, Duvall said he has no grudge against Wal-Mart but believes in capitalism coupled with sensitivity.

Duvall was joined by Congressmen Peter Welch of Vermont and Ted Poe of Texas, representing states that lost many lives at the Wilderness battle 145 years ago.

The Wal-Mart proposal must first be approved by Orange County supervisors.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: battlefields; civilwar; dixie; godsgravesglyphs; hollywood; robertduvall; robertelee; va2009; virginia; virginiahistory; walmart
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

1 posted on 05/04/2009 11:12:18 AM PDT by Publius804
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Publius804

“I love the smell of napalm in the morning!!”


2 posted on 05/04/2009 11:13:21 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804; stainlessbanner; Lee'sGhost

BTTT


3 posted on 05/04/2009 11:13:34 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

I support any effort to maintain historical battlefields in the U.S.


4 posted on 05/04/2009 11:14:32 AM PDT by WoodstockCat (General Honore: "The storm gets a vote... We're not stuck on stupid.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

Yankees don’t surf.


5 posted on 05/04/2009 11:15:23 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (When I leave this planet, it's gonna know I was here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

LOL!

Now you’ve got me imagining him calling in the Confederate Air Force for a napalm strike.


6 posted on 05/04/2009 11:16:32 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Publius804
Duvall said he has no grudge against Wal-Mart but believes in capitalism coupled with sensitivity.

The right approach.

7 posted on 05/04/2009 11:16:42 AM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804
I am as pro capitalism/laissez fair business as one can be.

On this, I agree with Mr Duvall. Preserve the serenity of the battlefield's region.

8 posted on 05/04/2009 11:16:49 AM PDT by llevrok (A feral conservative in my own land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WoodstockCat
Are you ready to pony up the $$$s to fund your beliefs?

Because if you start seizing peoples' property without adequately compensating them for their loss, then - well, the whole shebang is simply meaningless.

You might as well build a time machine and set it for "Moscow, 1917".

9 posted on 05/04/2009 11:17:18 AM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

Some folks hold that the field of battle is hallowed ground (and I am one of them). I like Wal-mart but there are other, more suitable locations.


10 posted on 05/04/2009 11:18:03 AM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804
Duvall, who is a descendant of Lee, said he will help preservationists in "chasing out" the retailer from a site near the Wilderness Battlefield.

Sounds like the proposed retail site is not actually on the battlefield.

11 posted on 05/04/2009 11:18:32 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WoodstockCat
"I support any effort to maintain historical battlefields in the U.S.

Ditto. Historical preservation is about as close to a liberal position as I get. We are frequently too cavalier when we abandon historical sites in favor of quick, cheap economic development.

12 posted on 05/04/2009 11:18:42 AM PDT by Big_Monkey (Flubama - bringing disease everywhere he goes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

Isn’t the Walmart site something like two miles from the battlefield?


13 posted on 05/04/2009 11:19:15 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

Good for him. To even think about putting a walmart near that location is sacriligeous! There needs to be a line between business and common sense and if Walmart doesn’t have the common sense to know this is not right...then Duvall and others will have it for them. We were successful in keeping a Walmart out of one particular area that we didn’t want. They had two options and chose the WRONG ONE. There was always someone out there with a petition to sign and the people gathered together and stood tall in their convictions. So, the little guy CAN defeat a big guy as long as they stand together. Walmart has other options I am sure and for them to even consider this is beyond words. Go Robert Duvall. Make it happen somewhere else!!! All battlefields should be respected and preserved. Too many died on both sides in that senseless war and so they should be fought for whenever anyone like Walmart comes in to do their thing. Capitalism is one thing but this is GREED in my opinion!!


14 posted on 05/04/2009 11:19:39 AM PDT by cubreporter (Rush Limbaugh - Truth, honesty and the American Way. Go Rush!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

I hope we are valiant in efforts to preserve the battlefield for future generations. Mr. Duvall is a welcome addition to the fight.


15 posted on 05/04/2009 11:20:45 AM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee

Whoa, there.
I never said anything about taking people’s existing property.
I’m simply talking about areas that have long been established to be part of the historical record of battle and that do not currently belong to someone else.
I’m not in favor of this government or any government forcing a person to do something with their property.
I’m talking about an educated campaign of facts and appreciation for our country’s history that strikes a reasonable balance.


16 posted on 05/04/2009 11:21:51 AM PDT by WoodstockCat (General Honore: "The storm gets a vote... We're not stuck on stupid.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee
"Because if you start seizing peoples' property without adequately compensating them for their loss, then - well, the whole shebang is simply meaningless.

That works both ways. It is very common, especially with the last SCOTUS ruling that people's property can be commandeered, not just for public works projects like roads or railways, but for economic development reasons, like Walmart. When people are forced to sell their property so it can be used by another private entity, that is wrong, IMHO.

17 posted on 05/04/2009 11:22:24 AM PDT by Big_Monkey (Flubama - bringing disease everywhere he goes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
Photobucket
18 posted on 05/04/2009 11:24:06 AM PDT by ontap (Just another backstabbing conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

I bet that if Wal-Mart management is made keenly aware of the situation, and the public feeling behind it, they will lead the effort to preserve the battlefield.


19 posted on 05/04/2009 11:24:17 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deb

This article doesn’t have that information. Maybe someone who lives locally could enlighten us on that?


20 posted on 05/04/2009 11:24:19 AM PDT by abigailsmybaby (To understan' the livin' you got to commune wit' da dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson