Posted on 05/29/2015 3:58:26 PM PDT by BruceDeitrickPrice
Private school kids can read. Classical academy kids can read. Montessori school kids can read. Homeschooled kids can read. Spot the pattern?
It’s only kids in public schools who can’t read. Why is that? You would think our education professors would figure out what the schools are doing wrong. In fact, they have not figured out very much in the last 80 years. Our professors seem mainly concerned with perpetuating the wrong ways to teach reading. And so the crisis continues.
Truth is, reading is easy to teach and easy to learn. All the phonics experts agree: reading is no big deal It should happen routinely in the first grade. Our brains are wired to learn to read. Many children learn to read with virtually no instruction. Reading is a problem only if the people in charge refuse to teach it correctly.
Here's the bad news. Our Education Establishment, starting around 1930, insisted on teaching reading the wrong way. Their favorite bogus method is called sight-words, Whole Word, Whole Language, and many other aliases. It doesn't work. (Phonics, on the other hand, does work. All the research confirms this.)
Here is additional bad news. Many school districts, after having shifted toward phonics for many years, are now recidivists. They have again embraced Dolch Words, Fry Words, high-frequency words, i.e., all the paraphernalia of bad teaching that virtually guarantee sub-literacy. Many schools and school districts now have websites which clearly tell children they must learn their sight-words, for example:
“Over half of every newspaper article, textbook, children's story, and novel is composed of these 300 words. It is difficult to write a sentence without using several of the first 300 words in the Fry 1000 Instant Words List. Consequently, students need to be able to read the first 300 Instant Words without a moment's hesitation.”
Savor the phrase “without a moment’s hesitation.” In education circles, such instant recall is referred to as “automaticity.” These websites make it sound so easy. In fact it's nearly impossible. Place on a table 25 objects— flags of Europe, brands of cars, famous people. Try to name all of them quickly with no hesitation. You’ll find it very difficult even with a small set of familiar objects. Imagine you need to know hundreds. Many children never gain automaticity with more than a few hundred words. All the other words they read in a fumbling way or not at all. And remember that these Dolch lists do not include proper names such as Benjamin Franklin and Germany. You see here the method by which our public schools create children who can’t read and don’t know very much.
Next consider a quote from a school site in Kentucky. The school dictates exactly what is supposed to happen but rarely does:
“SIGHT WORD POLICY—A high percentage of all reading material is composed of relatively few words. These high frequency words are called "sight words" because they must be recognized instantly, on sight, for reading fluency. Students in grades K-5 will be assessed on their grade level sight word list. All of the sight words are taken from the Fry Sight Word List. A report of this assessment will be included in the second grading report card. By the end of Kindergarten, students should be able to read 50 sight words. By the end of First Grade, students should be able to read 200 sight words. By the end of Second Grade, students should be able to read 400 sight words, and by the end of Third Grade, students should be able to read 600 words. By the end of Fourth Grade, students should be able to know 800 words. By the end of Fifth Grade, students should be able to know 1,000 words. In order to meet grade level goals, we are asking parents to work with their children on recognition of these sight words each day.”
Meanwhile, phonics-taught students will be reading by the second grade.
So now you know why so many children reach middle school hardly able to read, and thinking about giving up. As fast as they learn new sight-words, they forget the earlier ones. These kids are just a mess. Even if they do retain hundreds of sight-words, that’s not a lot in the vast English language. These kids cannot read an ordinary book, newspaper, or brochure, for the simple practical reason that most words they run into are unknown to them.
In sum, the public schools teaching sight-words are engaged in deceit. They pretend they don’t know the best way to teach reading. (Hint: it’s called phonics.) They pretend to be nutty professors stumbling around in the dark, always coming up with odd new approaches and strange new jargon.
At this point in our history, it’s critically important that every American reject these methods and the jargon. Just say no to Whole Word, sight-words, Fry Words, high-frequency words, and the rest.
It’s also critically important that every adult knows what phonics is: children learn the alphabet, then the sounds of the letters, and then the blends. At that point the student is reading. Real readers do not guess. They do not hesitate. They do not leave out words. They do not substitute words. They read from left to right, syllable by syllable and word by word. Even with this minimal understanding of the process, adults can protect the next generation.
Our tragedy is that we have public schools that shamelessly use bad methods and get bad results. Then they stand around acting surprised that they’ve gotten bad results. The Education Establishment cannot admit they know what they are doing wrong. And they cannot blame themselves. Instead, they blame the weakest, most defenseless person in sight. That’s the kid who can’t read. Every one of these non-readers is said to have some sort of mental or emotional problem. They are ADHD. They have dyslexia. The family is alcoholic and dysfunctional. Etc.
Meanwhile, if we could check, we would probably find the kids in the public schools are, at the start of first grade, genetically and cognitively identical to all the other kids in the area. The differences, if any, emerge after the kids are in public schools for a few years. By that time they have raging cases of what might best be called “dysteachia" and “schoolitis"— that is, wholly artificial disabilities created in our classrooms.
CODA: “Why Johnny Can’t Read" by Rudolf Flesch was published 60 years ago in 1955. This is one of the most important books in America’s intellectual history. It explains in simple terms why there was an epidemic of bad readers. At that point the story got very strange. Our Education Establishment sneered at Flesch and went right on promoting their dysfunctional ideas. They do so until this day. The pattern is quite obvious: the Education Establishment will do to each community what the community will put up with. So if you have any hope of your children learning to read, you have to push back. Insist on phonics starting in K. Second-grade children should be able to select their own little books and read them. And thus the illiteracy crisis ends.
---
For a quick introduction to phonics, Google “54: Preemptive Reading.”
Slaves do not need to be able to read, only obey their masters. But these methods come from the best schools of education in the country! Of course we should use them!
Without PHONICS, you cannot even try to “sound out” a word. That’s what phonics are all about. Hence the name...
Also, please forgive my failure to copy-read my response. But just as an addendum, note that every word in the dictionary is couched in phonetic symbolisn. And it is not “whole word” that allows us to distinguish between the noun for the element and the verb whose infinitive is to lead, and whose past tense led has the same sound as the element lead, and which nost journalist are now regularly confusing, being lazy with the text editor’s spell-checker.
This article hardly addresses the issue... middle and upper middle school children have few problems reading. The poor and working class, have more issues in all academic subjects, not just reading.That coupled with social promotion, means these kids get shuffled up the grades without having to learn.
“I don’t have a problem with sight words, and I don’t see an advantage with phonics.”
How many “sight words” did your kids learn? Hopefully 10,000 or so, or they won’t be very good readers. In what fonts? Were they lower case, capitalized, or all capitals? What do they do if they haven’t “seen” a word before?
Figuring out a word just from its shape leaves out a lot of variables. Sight words are fine, after the kid knows how to read.
(sorry, I get pretty damn emotional about this)
“Kids should know how to read even before entering school.”
Kids MUST know how to read before entering school, or they’re basically doomed...as they will never learn it correctly, simply because that’s no longer the goal of schools.
“We had to watch her because we discovered she was capable of reading stuff that was a little too, uh, mature, for a kid her age. It was a challenge. /grin”
Same with our kids - they were plowing through old adult novels (starting at 5 years old). I dread to think of what was in them, but they didn’t seem to get affected.
How can kids learn to read if their teacher can't read? How can a teacher who can't read keep his/her job? Because they can't be fired.
“I could read anything put in front of me when I was three years old thanks to mother. Thanks, Ma!”
Outstanding...my kids say similar. TEACH them to read (as opposed to reading to them) and they appreciate you for life. It’s the single biggest gift a parent can give, and it costs next to nothing.
“But these methods come from the best schools of education in the country! Of course we should use them! “
You may be saying this sarcastically, but, unfortunately the vast majority of people, and even MOST FReepers agree with you. They usually don’t know it since all they do is dump their kids into the government institution and not worry if the people that will shape their kids’ entire lives HAVE ANY IDEA of what they’re doing.
“The poor and working class, have more issues in all academic subjects, not just reading.”
It’s difficult to do word problems in math, or learn science or history, if you can’t read. Maybe behavior issues aren’t related to reading ability (and even that can be argued), but just about everything academic is.
Reading is the gift that keeps on giving, and so many parents I have known did not. Think what would be if every one had done so...
Also, P.S.—good on you!
One for you guys...
Mucho thanks (a little Spanish lingo).
Mom taught me phonics (1960ish)
When in the Second Grade I was checking out “The Wizard of Oz” from the Library, the Librarian didn’t think it was a suitable book for my age (6 or 7) and asked me to read from it, I read her a page and she said “Well I guess I was wrong”
She wasn’t, I was the oldest of *6 and I neglected to keep it from my siblings that proceeded to deface it with color crayons... folks had to buy the book. I had it until about the 8th Grade, then lost it among other things when I discovered Girls.
TT
*Mom had 6 kids in 5 years, (twins) ;^).
When I retire I would like to find a deserving innercity voucher school and help tutor reading.
I wouldn’t mind doing something like that.
NOT ALL KIDS CAN OR SHOULD READ BY AGE 6!!! My son, home schooled, did not read until he was 9. Then again, he was doing Newton and Bernoulli at 7. Many boys’ brains, in particular, are not neurologically developed enough to begin reading until between the ages of 7 - 9. Fast forward - he finished college English at 16 and just graduated from an honors college.
Raymond Moore’s “Better Late than Early” is a fantastic source. Key to language learning is hearing words and stories between the ages of 1 - 5. The Achievement gap would disappear if all children had parents who read and talked with them in something more than monosyllables.
That's pretty impressive!
I started first grade in 1942, two months before I was six. We had no such thing as "kindergarten" and we had never heard of "phonetics." As I said, I had to invent my own.
I had exactly the same kind of experience with the town librarian when I wanted to check out "The Last of the Mohicans" by James Fenimore Cooper, but later she sarted ordering books for me.
In your day, my oldest son was reading stories to his brothers and sister, reading the text upside down so they could learn to read while he was tutoring them in it. That was about 1965.
He was so far ahead of me, at the equivalent age.
Just sayin' that given the tools, a young child should be permitted/encouraged to rapidly develop while the mind is still inquisitive, expanding asymptotically, and malleable, to find his/her own creative way to deal with a world that wants to put them in a pedestrian straitjacket.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.