Posted on 03/30/2016 3:43:24 PM PDT by bigbob
If they are obviously fake prove it
If they are obviously fake why did she scrub her Twitter account
Are the matching Churchill ink tweets fake too
Hi there! I happened upon your post.
Unfortunately Trump has Pluto sq. Jupiter for the next month - this is a foot-in-mouth transit, and legal issues. Today is just the start, Trump University will seem like peanuts...
"bwtaylor NepotismIsDomesticTerrorism • 10 months ago how about dead with ted? the truth is everybody that truly knows ted knows he's crazy as a shit house mouse!! even the tx.tea party can see it now. by by ted!!!"
I never once said not to judge a man on his character- I HAVE been saying right along judge him on his character and NOT on slimy dirty rumors- People have for weeks, and longer than that even making crap up about Ted- they are NOT judging him on true character, they are inventing a fictitious character about him and judging him on that - just today they Falsely accused him of ‘supporting abortion’- in previous days they’ve accused him of not looking sincere- whatever the hell that means- then of ‘looking guilty’ and judgign him on eye movement of all things- This moronic mis characterization is NOT simply judging someone on their true character- it’;s judging them on a fictitious characterization of the person they have already deemed guilty before any evidence has surfaced- you seem to ignore that there’s no hard evidence out here but there sure is plenty of filthy minded conjecture regarding Ted- Amanda and others-
Wonder if Mandy Carp has seen that.
“This moronic mis characterization is NOT simply judging someone on their true character- it’;s judging them on a fictitious characterization of the person they have already deemed guilty before any evidence has surfaced- you seem to ignore that there’s no hard evidence out here but there sure is plenty of filthy minded conjecture regarding Ted- Amanda and others-”
Your own words above contradict your own statements and demonstrate a selective hypocrisy by objecting easily defensible cases while omitting the indefensible cases. Ted Cruz condemned and demanded the firing of Corey Lewandowski for performing his lawful protective duties before discovery, trial, or conviction; yet Ted Cruz and his campaign has demonstrably engaged in what is some highly unethical or perhaps illegal political dirty tricks. You demand proof beyond a reasonable doubt in defense of Cruz, yet subjective allegations and perhaps rumors suffice for opponents of Ted Cruz. It is that kind of apparent hypocrisy which is discrediting what you have to say.
“I find it doubtful that the police would file charges against someone at Lewandowski’s position without checking with the prosecutor first. If the charges were to be dropped it would be a massive amount of egg on the face of the police.”
The Chief of Police of Jupiter is a Clinton Democrat. He can extract his pound of flesh to impact the election and still fall back on the excuse the video evidence was sufficient to require the charge be made on behalf of the plaintiff, Michelle Fields. Another excuse he can use is to observe how Michelle Fields can use the criminal complaint to file a civil lawsuit after the criminal complaint is dismissed by the state prosecutor.
Made up lies or Assertions in absence of actual knowledge are not "Evidence." That is exactly my point. These are techniques whereby an innocent man can be railroaded into appearing guilty.
We, that is we people who still have some understanding of ethics, should not be engaging in rumor mongering and sleaze throwing. There is currently no reasonable evidence to support these claims, and freepers should not keep repeating them and condemning the man as a "sleaze" until their *is* some reasonable evidence to support these claims.
We have lost the ability to give a man the benefit of the doubt. Most of the ones who are doing it, are doing it because they are trying to push the other candidate, and not because they have any real reason to believe these accusations are true.
Very unethical behavior.
pssst- where’s your hard evidence?
[[yet Ted Cruz and his campaign has demonstrably engaged in what is some highly unethical or perhaps illegal political dirty tricks.]]
Psssst- where’s your evidence? Those are serious allegations- where’s the evidence?
[[It is that kind of apparent hypocrisy which is discrediting what you have to say.]]
BS- anti-Cruz people are doing exactly what i said- taking idiotic RUMORS and inflating them to disgusting proportions because their filthy minds can’t allow them to let the evidence lead where it will and they feel the ‘need’ to ‘help the story along’ by inventing filthy disgusting crap abotu Ted-
Tell me Whisky- where is ted doing Anything even remotely close to that to donald? Nowhere- thats’ where-
[[Ted Cruz condemned and demanded the firing of Corey Lewandowski for performing his lawful protective duties before discovery, trial, or conviction;]]
I’m sorry- how does viewing a video- seeing bruises afterwards, and making a connection between the two even remotely rise to the level of innuendo and filthy Romona mongering that is being done to Ted again?
The crap begin done by anti-Cruz people does not even begin to compare with your example- and it’s a ridiculous claim to make that it shows hypocrisy- There’s a huige difference between seeing something actually happen, and hearing something from someone’s best friend’s neighbor’s sister in law and claiming that is fact- and not only that but running with it and inventing all kinds of crap to ‘support the ‘evidence’- don’t you even try to compare the two-
Keep spinning Whiskey-
[[Although Lewandowski initially admitted fault to Fields’s editor, and the incident last week in Florida was witnessed by a Washington Post reporter and captured on audio and video,]]
[[Sources: Trump Campaign Manager Admits to Allegedly Assaulting Reporter Michelle Fields, Left Her Bruised
During a discussion with Breitbart’s Matt Boyle and reported by The Daily Beast, Lewandowski admitted to grabbing Fields and made the excuse that he didn’t realize she worked for Breitbart, a Trump friendly outlet. ]]
[[”That’s pretty conclusive, even with the freeze framing,” he tweeted, adding: “Clearly I was wrong; @bterris right.” (Ben Terris, a reporter at the Washington Post, witnessed the incident and wrote about it in a story.)]]
Woopsie- Oh darn- it looks Like ted made his rematk based o nseveral key FACTS- Lewandowski it turns out originally admitted he had done it- Lewandowski was charged by police (who generally don’t charge unless they have cause to do so) and video evidence and photo evidence of bruises- Why in the world wouldn’t Ted ask him to resign after his own admission and the other evidence if he worked for him? anti-cruz hacks would be jumping all over Ted to fire him- then ted would fire him and these same hacks would accuse him of trying to cover something up- Generally when someone admits to something it’s pretty good evidence one is guilty-
I must have missed where Ted ‘is demanding that lewandowski be fired’?
“If the allegations are true, someone has done America a big favor by outing a man who would be decimated fro these acts nu the DNC general election campaign and we would be screwed by Hillary taking power.”
And yet the MSM is ignoring the story completely.
Just like with Hillary’s emails, unless the sheeple are told what to think, nothing will happen.
So, how have you been? My 30x60 garden is coming along! There will be a lot of backbreaking work in my future, if I’m lucky ;)
I have two potato plants that need to be transplanted before they become restricted. Hope the frost this weekend doesn’t get to your garden plants. Hope all is well with you and yours.
[[And yet the MSM is ignoring the story completely.]]
And for good reason- This rumor has been shopped aroudn for months now and noon would take it because it was so lame a rumor- several news sites and blogs have stated there was nothing to the allegations at all- no substance, nothing worth pursuing- only the national enquirer has run with the story-
I picked up the National enquirer today because anti-cruz zealots assured us that ‘all we had to do was wait till monday (and then when that didn’t materialize, Wait till Thursday) and the national enquirer was goign to ‘lower the boom’ and ‘Ted’s career woudl be over’
Anyway, I read the article, and there was absoltuely nothign there- not one bit of concrete evidence- Zero- Here’s a rundown- and honest, it was all that was i nte article basically
Here’s the ‘blistering new evidence’ anti-cruz hacks are casting all their hopes of destroying 5 women and a man and his family over
A ‘snitch’ reports that he/she ‘heard ted had sex in a closet’ (The woman denies it)
an ‘insider’ (unnamed of course) says ‘it is alleged’ that Ted had affair with one of his staff
Another ‘Snitch’ says that someone ‘caught Ted and another woman ‘getting cozy together’ on the campaign trail
Another ‘insider’ Says a ‘4’th woman= MAY HAVE - had an affair
another ‘source’ claims Ted has had sex with a prositute-
and the final ‘devastating evidence’ ‘reported’ by the National Enquirer? A blogger- Yes, a blogger has said essentially that Ted is ‘utterly destroyed’ as a CHristian man
And the NE ‘reported that Ted had a drinking problem sometime in the past- (As though this somehow solidifies the slimy cheating rumors
That’s it- Now we are ‘assured’ by the anti-cruz zealots that “The National Enquirer has the evidence, but they are waiting for the right time to announce it so that they can keep people buying their scandal rag in anticipation’
You have growing potatoes already? Ours are still underground. I still don’t know about all the timeframes here, but am learning. Several ladies at one church (I’m still checking out the MANY churches in my neighborhood, mostly Baptist of course ;) before I pick one to join for good) believe strongly in moon signs. The traditions here are adorable.
We’re good. Putting on an addition, building a barn, adding an orchard, getting ready for economic collapse should Trump not prevail.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.