Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Q drop #671 :(2/5/2018)
https://qcodefag.github.io ^ | 2/5/2018 | Q Anon

Posted on 02/05/2018 11:08:17 PM PST by ransomnote

#671

Feb 5 2018 22:34:50

Q

NEW

Public interest [keep high].

U1 FBI informant.

AWAN/DWS/Paki intel/MB.

Tarmac meeting [SC/LL deal > AS 187].

Q


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: gibberish; ovaltine; qanon; somekidinbasement
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-146 next last

1 posted on 02/05/2018 11:08:17 PM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1_Rain_Drop; 103198; 31R1O; 4Liberty; Hemingway's Ghost; a little elbow grease; acrolect; ...

Q Ping


2 posted on 02/05/2018 11:08:58 PM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
Decoder Ring ON
3 posted on 02/05/2018 11:15:06 PM PST by SFConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

2nd drop here
#Qanon — https://t.co/nejV4wfMBC


4 posted on 02/05/2018 11:15:39 PM PST by weston (HERE'S THE STORY: As far as I'm concerned, it's Christ or nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
Yeah, what happened to the guy who was supposed to testify about the U1 deal. He had tapes, as I recall, that would bury HRC & BHO.

The Awan, Debbie Waserman Shultz deal is pretty quiet too. I'm not sure if the Muslim Brotherhood factors into that, but I'd like to find out.

Oh yeah? How about the tarmac meeting of LL and WJC? Did Bill really offer her a spot on the Supreme Court? Q sort of says so. Hmmm.

5 posted on 02/05/2018 11:17:53 PM PST by Wingy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
TRUMP goes off-the-cuff in Ohio: “Oh, did we catch them in the act? They are very embarrassed. They never thought they were going to get caught. We caught ‘em! Hey, we caught ‘em, oh, it’s so much fun. We’re like... the Great Sleuth.”

-----------------------------

Build timeline.
AS 187.
HRC investigation pivot points.
JC dismiss letter.
#2.
PS.
WL comms.
Q

Scalia died: February 13, 2016
Clinton / Lynch Tarmac meeting: June 26, 2016
Comey clears Hillary #1: July 5, 2016
Comey fired: May 9, 2017

6 posted on 02/05/2018 11:20:20 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Maybe these Q things, whatever they are, might make sense in Romulan? ( if they had any real or imagined importance - even to just their author- they’d be communicated in an understandable manner instead of all this gibberish. )


7 posted on 02/05/2018 11:21:33 PM PST by faithhopecharity ("Politicans aren't born, they're excreted." -Marcus Tillius Cicero (3 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity
pretty straight forward, need dates for timeline:

AS 187. (February 13, 2016)
HRC investigation pivot points.
JC dismiss letter. (July 5, 2016)
#2. (when Hillary was cleared again one month after Weiner laptop reported in October __ 2016)
PS. (Strzok events)
WL comms. (WikiLeaks releases and other communications

8 posted on 02/05/2018 11:26:03 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

Anthony Scalia 187’d to make way for Lynch on court?
Her reward for helping Clinton’s?


9 posted on 02/05/2018 11:27:22 PM PST by weston (HERE'S THE STORY: As far as I'm concerned, it's Christ or nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: weston

that’s always been the background byline ... the whole thing was suspicious at the time. He’d been saying that he was sure the SCOTUS was bugged (and now we can presume they were) - hopefully somebody diligent, maybe TG, is going back through the thousands of FISA warrants.


10 posted on 02/05/2018 11:31:52 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Wingy

Q seems to be saying that Clinton agreed to have Scalia murdered through his tarmac meeting with Loretta L.

How does the timeline work on that?

And the Debbie WS link to the Muslim Brotherhood would put her in line for treason maybe? Certainly something bad.


11 posted on 02/05/2018 11:34:20 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

I suspect that they just go ahead and bug anyone anywhere that they want. Only when they need to bring something out in the open do they go get a warrant. So they might not have bothered to get one.


12 posted on 02/05/2018 11:36:47 PM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

Come on, Q has been right on lots of key stuff by now. And typing out directly the accusations he is sharing would be hard for some folks (surely like you) to swallow at this point—particularly if the evidence is not yet public to back it up.


13 posted on 02/05/2018 11:37:04 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

So much needs to be exposed.
I think military trials are coming. This just happened today: Secretary of Defense fires Guantánamo war court overseer.http://amp.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/americas/guantanamo/article198456714.html?__twitter_impression=true


14 posted on 02/05/2018 11:37:09 PM PST by weston (HERE'S THE STORY: As far as I'm concerned, it's Christ or nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

See above. Scalia offed in February. Tarmac meeting in June. Clinton cleared in July.

If Scalia was killed to make room for Lowretta, it was advance planning.


15 posted on 02/05/2018 11:38:47 PM PST by AZLiberty ("If we believe in absurdities, we commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

So Clinton reminding LL of the AS murder in order to get her to accelerate the dropping of or drop the case against his wife?

Is that plausible?


16 posted on 02/05/2018 11:40:36 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

All of this just about propels my skull bone off the top of my head. I understand just enough to be freaked out worse than a horror movie. However, Q is so upbeat about more good of us than bad, and we will win. I pray that is true.


17 posted on 02/05/2018 11:40:39 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Also Merrick Garland was the nominee from March until Obama’s tenure expired. Perhaps he was just a placeholder for Lynch all along.

If Clinton had won, FBI files would probably have come to play on enough senators to get Lynch in.


18 posted on 02/05/2018 11:42:51 PM PST by AZLiberty ("If we believe in absurdities, we commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: weston

That seems to fit re: Lynch and the SC nomination.

When was it clear that Congress wasn’t going to give Obama his nominee? WOuld have been by then.


19 posted on 02/05/2018 11:43:15 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
Garland was nominated Mar 16, 2016 by Obama

Now ... white hat or black hat: Carl Ghattas ?
"In 2014, he was appointed special agent in charge of the Washington Field Office's counterterrorism program and, most recently, served as the assistant director of the Counterterrorism Division."

20 posted on 02/05/2018 11:46:52 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson