Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: 'Bush's Stance Led Newsom To Take Action' (AG Bill Lockyer was given 'heads up')
Sin Freaksicko Comical ^ | February 15, 2004 | Rachel Gordon

Posted on 02/16/2004 12:14:53 PM PST by L.N. Smithee

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:45:46 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: hunter112
Hell, I think God may owe Soddom and Gomorrah an apology. That is, if San FranFreako doesn't fall in the sea.
61 posted on 02/17/2004 5:58:07 AM PST by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
Take action!

Gov. Schwarzenegger
Phone: 916-445-2841
Fax: 916-445-4633
Email: governor@governor.ca.gov
Sen. Barbara Boxer
DC office: 202-224-3553
SF office: 415-403-0100
Email:http://www.boxer.senate.gov/contact/webform.cfm

Sen. Dianne Feinstein
DC office: 224-3841
SF office: 415-393-0707
Email: http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/email.html

Contact San Francisco Leaders

Let San Francisco leaders know you oppose the city's unlawful actions. We encourage you to be polite, but let San Francisco know that this is outrageous:

San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom
Telephone: (415) 554-6141
Fax: (415) 554-6160
Email: gavin.newsom@sfgov.org

City Assessor Mabel Teng (processing licenses)
Phone: 415-554-5516
e-mail: assessor@sfgov.org

County Clerk's Office (conducting ceremonies)

Phone: 415-554-4955
e-mail: county.clerk@sfgov.org

62 posted on 02/17/2004 6:14:11 AM PST by yoe (WMD come in small containers/vials...small minds don't want you to know that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
For class reading...thanks.
63 posted on 02/17/2004 6:57:24 AM PST by Van Jenerette (Our Republic...If we can keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe
It's civil war of course.

If it's civil war, can we all assume that you're on the President's side of it??

64 posted on 02/17/2004 7:00:46 AM PST by ohioWfan (BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
If it's civil war, can we all assume that you're on the President's side of it??

Well, I tell you what. When you figure out what "the President's side of it" is, let me know, and then I'll let you know whether or not I'm on the same side.

You have any problem with that?

As far as I'm aware (and I'm just waking up, so maybe he's already weighed in on this item, and I just haven't read about it yet), he has not stated whether or not he has taken any "side" in the San Fransico Mayor's stunt. Until such time as he does (if he does), I'm not really in any position to way whether or not I agree with his "side" of it.

After all, I'm certainly not going to give him my blind obedience, and declare what whatever side he should happen to take -- when/if he decides to take a side -- will automatically be my side. No one in his right mind would offer that kind of blind obedience.

65 posted on 02/17/2004 7:27:43 AM PST by Don Joe (I own my vote. It's for rent to the highest bidder, paid in adherence to the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: hunter112
>If conservatives are smart, they will save their lawyering
>for the hearings to determine the validity of the
>certificates.

I have a feeling that if they have gone to the trouble of planning all this out, that they already have the pro-sodomite judges lined up to tie this thing up in court for years as it works its way up through California's court to the US Supreme court. Meanwhile, the first CA court that rules the licenses legal will open the floodgates in California.

The courts are no longer a just and fair field of battle for this fight. The governor (executive branch) needs to call out the national guard and bring the SF Mayor (executive branch) into line without appealing to the judicial.
66 posted on 02/17/2004 7:27:50 AM PST by applemac_g4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe
Argh, I said I was just waking up, and I proved it.

"to way whether or not" should have been "to say whether or not"
67 posted on 02/17/2004 7:30:12 AM PST by Don Joe (I own my vote. It's for rent to the highest bidder, paid in adherence to the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
>If it's civil war, can we all assume that you're on the
>President's side of it??

That would be the side that says "no gay marriage, but permit civil unions granting them the benefits of marriage."

No, I'm not on that side.

I'm on the side that says "no gay marriage, no civil unions."
68 posted on 02/17/2004 7:31:31 AM PST by applemac_g4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: applemac_g4
The governor (executive branch) needs to call out the national guard and bring the SF Mayor (executive branch) into line without appealing to the judicial.

You don't seriously believe that he will, though, right?

I hope no one is setting themselves up for a megadisappointment by trusting in Ahnahld to step up to the plate and take a stand in this situation -- because even if he does (fat chance, IMO), it won't be the one we'd like to see. It wasn't all that long ago, recall, that he voiced an opinion in favor of this sort of thing, after all.

69 posted on 02/17/2004 7:33:38 AM PST by Don Joe (I own my vote. It's for rent to the highest bidder, paid in adherence to the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: applemac_g4
I'm on the side that says "no gay marriage, no civil unions."

The fact that the country is even having this "debate" is a clear and ominous indication that we're in that space generally occupied by Wily Coyotee before he looks down, and discovers that he's gone waaaaay past the edge of the cliff.

Someone needs to set the nation's Wayback Machine to "normal", but I'm not expecting that to happen. I honestly believe that the madness has passed the point of no return, and is going to end up running its course.

After the dust settles, whoever is left with their wits about them can try to pick up the pieces. I have no idea if that will happen in any of our lifetimes, though.

70 posted on 02/17/2004 7:38:01 AM PST by Don Joe (I own my vote. It's for rent to the highest bidder, paid in adherence to the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
"he also fleeced the silly gays out of their money. That's theft."

From what I understand, they were all too happy to give it. They're paying for a political statement, not a marriage license. These licenses are actually printed with a pretty strong disclaimer.
71 posted on 02/17/2004 7:41:36 AM PST by Kahonek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe; applemac_g4
Blind obedience?? Who said anything about blind obedience??

I'm referring to the fact that it was the President's statement in the State of the Union that precipitated this horrendous chain of events.

Apparently THEY know who their enemy is...........

72 posted on 02/17/2004 8:12:08 AM PST by ohioWfan (BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan; applemac_g4
Blind obedience?? Who said anything about blind obedience??

Hey, if it's no big deal, let's not get so huffy about it, OK? Don't protest too much, eh?

I'm referring to the fact that it was the President's statement in the State of the Union that precipitated this horrendous chain of events.

Oh, please. Don't tell me you really buy into that line of tripe they dished out, do you? You don't really believe that they weren't chomping at the bit to play out this little drama, looking for any excuse to hang on it? You don't think that the idea never occured to them prior to Bush tossing the right a bone in his speech?

Please, tell me you don't buy that idea!

Apparently THEY know who their enemy is...........

Um, that would be every normal person in the country, right? Wrong?

73 posted on 02/17/2004 8:19:16 AM PST by Don Joe (I own my vote. It's for rent to the highest bidder, paid in adherence to the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
This was a conspiracy by the Mayor of San Francisco, the Judicial and Executive branches of the California government against the 'tyrannical majority' of that State.
74 posted on 02/17/2004 8:25:47 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe
I'm not huffy. It's just really tiring to see the same old stupid accusations. Your immediate response to my question was to accuse, and it's irritating. We should be on the same side in this 'war' Don, but you want to subdivide the good side.

You may believe what you want about it, but the immoral left HATES this President and his morality, and whether or not it was an 'excuse,' the President's stance against gay marriage offends them.

And NO, every 'normal' person in this country is NOT their enemy. Many have been convinced (brainwashed) that they must be tolerant of this lewd behavior, and should let them do what they want.

75 posted on 02/17/2004 8:30:51 AM PST by ohioWfan (BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan; Lazamataz
I'm not huffy.

You sure seem huffy to me.

It's just really tiring to see the same old stupid accusations.

That's why I bristled at your implied accusation of any potential disloyalty to Our Glorious Leader on my part.

Your immediate response to my question was to accuse, and it's irritating.

So close, yet such absence of cigar sign.

Let's begin with PKB. Moving along, let's rephrase what you said to bring it into line with what I actually posted, shall we? In other words, "my immediate reaction to your accusation was to question it" -- and, I find your accusation, and your gamesmanship -- to be irritating.

We should be on the same side in this 'war' Don, but you want to subdivide the good side.

Oh, good grief, here we go. It's Loyalty Test Time, kiddies! Let's all roll up our sleeves and swear obedience to... well, to whatever we're told to swear obedience to. It's the Best Way, after all. Just do not question anything about Your Leader. Do not doubt anything about Your Leader. Don't even look like you might have anything other than the utmost support, admiration, and obedience to Your Leader. Um, I mean Our Leader.

You may believe what you want about it, but the immoral left HATES this President and his morality, and whether or not it was an 'excuse,' the President's stance against gay marriage offends them.

Um, whatever.

I envy you. You seem to believe that you know what his stance is on that matter. All I know is what I see, and what I hear. And so far, I haven't seen much, and I haven't heard much. All I've seen is a bone flying in my general direction, and all I've heard is the whooosh of it flying, and the thud of it landing. Beside that, I haven't seen or heard anything that would amount to anything.

No, I am not easily satisfied. It takes results and actions to satisfy me. Talk is cheap, and I've paid plenty. Let's stop there, before I upset your apparently tender sensibilities.

And NO, every 'normal' person in this country is NOT their enemy. Many have been convinced (brainwashed) that they must be tolerant of this lewd behavior, and should let them do what they want.

Well, I guess we're talking different languages, because I don't consider brainwashed masses, incapable of making rational observations or decisions to be "normal", except in the most clinical of statistical senses. And since I am talking in absolute terms (i.e., if 85% of the population decides it's OK to eat their young, I would still not consider eating one's young to be "normal"), I think you now know what I meant by what I said, and, why I disagree with your assessment as to every normal person in the country not being viewed by "them" as the opposition.

76 posted on 02/17/2004 8:48:42 AM PST by Don Joe (I own my vote. It's for rent to the highest bidder, paid in adherence to the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe
OK.......I have to ignore most of what you posted because it assumes falsely, and mocks injudiciously.

But let's get to the bottom line, shall we?

America is in a fight for its very life, for its soul.

I'm praying for America daily, and I'm praying for the President, too. Not as 'our glorious leader,' but as a sinner saved by grace, who needs God's guidance to lead this country. I pray for his ability to discern what God is saying, especially in areas of morality, like this.

If you want what's best for America with regard to its righteousness, then we SHOULD be on the same side of this fight (regardless of our differing views on the President).

This IS a war. And we should be fighting it together.

I'm willing.....are you?

77 posted on 02/17/2004 9:05:55 AM PST by ohioWfan (BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
If you want what's best for America with regard to its righteousness, then we SHOULD be on the same side of this fight (regardless of our differing views on the President).

This IS a war. And we should be fighting it together.

I'm willing.....are you?

I'm not sure what you're getting at. As to Bush, I am of mixed emotion. He is clearly a flawed human. Not as flawed as some, that much is obvious; but, more flawed than others, which is equally obvious.

It's no secret that I am disappointed in his performance, and, my disappointment is compounded by the fact that I voted for him, and supported him with such enthusiasm and hope during the last election cycle.

I've voted for people I've disliked before, and, I've not voted for people I've disliked. Likes and dislikes are not "voting issues" for me. (Unfortunately I do not believe this is the case for the majority of voters over the years.) So, I do not give any indication of how I may or may not vote, nor do I suggest that anything I've said in the past is any indication of where I stand today -- or will stand tomorrow. I stand on my rights as an American citizen to proudly support the treasured concept of a secret ballot.

Ultimately, my support for any politician is something that he decides to earn, or not earn.

Now, that out of the way, I do agree that "America is in a fight for its very life, for its soul," and frankly, I am not optimistic as to the outcome. The more I examine the situation en toto, the more I'm convinced that it's truly passed the point of no return, and is consigned to running its course.

The implications, of course, are nothing I want to think about, so, I try not to think about them too much. I try to think about things like putting in my garden this spring, I try to think about selling some gourmet vegetables (sweetest onions in the world, grown in Michigan of all places, due to the unique soil we've got on our five miserable acres), and using the money to grow more onions next year, and, to build a hydroponic greenhouse, so that I can sell snap peas year round.

Have you ever bought snap peas in the grocery store? They are absurdly expensive, and they are always picked much too early, much too soon, far short of maturity. In the store, they are hollow tubes, with thin, tasteless shells, and tiny shriveled "pre-peas". From my garden, though, they are near-solid, with thick, crunchy pods, very sweet, and full-sized peas, also very sweet. Something you can sink your teeth into. I walked a friend down to the garden, told him to pick some and tell me what he thought. He ended up grazing for about a half hour, telling me (inbetween bites) how amazing the snap peas tasted.

I figure I can do pretty good with a nice hydroponic greenhouse, and do a pretty decent business. The local electric coop did an article in their magazine about a guy in the next town with a hydroponic greenhouse, 1/4 acre, he grew tomatoes. He said he grew more tomatoes in that quarter acre of hydroponics than he'd be able to produce on 100 acres of dirt.

I also think about going out and shooting my remaining stores of Kodachrome 25 before they stop offering K14 processing for it. There's no substitute, and there's no way to home-process it. It's the end of an era. Sort of like much of what this country is going through, now that I think about it. But, I try not to think about it.

I try to think about how I'll make it through the next months and years with my spine and major joints decomposing. I try to think about how it doesn't really matter that I'm taking a multiple of the amount of drugs that Limbaugh got himself into a twist over -- and, still hurting, all the time. I think about a lot of things. I have a lot of things to think about. I try not to think about the country going down the tubes, though, because it sure looks like it is going down the tubes, and the few in a position to do anything about it aren't too interested in doing anything about it.

So, what do I think about where the country is headed? I think that anyone who really wants to think about that -- and I don't recommend thinking about it too much -- go out and rent a copy of "The Postman".

After they watch it, they should remind themselves that it's only fiction. Reality is apt to be much worse.

78 posted on 02/17/2004 10:49:34 AM PST by Don Joe (I own my vote. It's for rent to the highest bidder, paid in adherence to the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe
He is clearly a flawed human. Not as flawed as some, that much is obvious; but, more flawed than others, which is equally obvious.

On this, I will disagree. He is not less flawed than other humans. We are all equally sinful.....our righteousness as filthy rags.

The difference is that some of us heed God's call to repentance, and are forgiven.

I believe this to be true of the President, and so I pray that he continues to heed God's call, understanding that he will make mistakes......

As for those vegetables......Michigan is not far from Ohio......when will they be for sale? :o)

79 posted on 02/17/2004 10:56:48 AM PST by ohioWfan (BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
On this, I will disagree. He is not less flawed than other humans. We are all equally sinful.....our righteousness as filthy rags.

The difference is that some of us heed God's call to repentance, and are forgiven.

Well, yes and no. In a strictly theological sense, yes, but in a practical sense, there are degrees. I am not talking in terms of salvation, but of... well, not sure what word to use, so I'll just say "trust" and let the context fill in the blanks.

On the one hand, you have Billy Graham. Flawed, forgiven. I'd trust him with my wife, my kids, my property, with no qualms at all. Then, there are people like David Berkowitz, whom from what I've observed in the press, is also a sincere repentant believer. Flawed, forgiven. But, I prefer that he remain in prison, and I would not be comfortable trusting him with my wife, children, etc.

So, there are degrees. Those are two extremes at either end of the scale. Everyone else is in between.

As to the vegetables, weather and wife permitting <g>, I'll get them in when the ice is gone, then a month or two before they're at their best, depending on the weather.

80 posted on 02/17/2004 11:10:07 AM PST by Don Joe (I own my vote. It's for rent to the highest bidder, paid in adherence to the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson