Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blair lead cut to two points: poll
Reuters by way of The Australian ^ | 24FEB05 | Reuters

Posted on 02/24/2005 10:43:01 AM PST by familyop

BRITAIN'S opposition Conservative Party has bounced back to within two points of Prime Minister Tony Blair's ruling Labour Party during campaigning for an election expected in May, according to a poll today.

The Mori poll for the Financial Times said the Conservatives had narrowed last October's 10-point gap to record the party's best poll performance since July 2003.

The survey was conducted at the weekend following intense pre-election campaigning, which has focused on domestic issues such as immigration, public services and the economy.

The poll, published on the FT's website (http://www.ft.com) put Labour on 39 per cent, the Conservatives on 37 per cent and the Liberal Democrat party on 18 per cent.

Mr Blair, who won landslide election victories in 1997 and 2001, has seen his once sky-high public trust ratings fall over his support for US President George W. Bush in Iraq, a war most Britons opposed at the start.

But analysts and polls suggest he is still on course to clinch an unprecedented third consecutive victory for Labour.

Mori interviewed 1948 adults between February 17 and 21 at 193 locations across Britain.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: antiamerican; blair; conservative; eurabia; labor; labour; radiofreeeurope; tory; ukelection
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
So if the Labour Party over there doesn't win, will we continue to see support in the War on Terror from its most visible leader?

In Canada, there was once a similar situation. Lester B. Pearson (the Liberal) defeated John Diefenbaker. Pearson was the more pro-American of the two. Diefenbaker's background included membership in a very anti-American group within the British Conservative Party.

Political parties in some foreign countries are interesting, to say the least, but we should learn about them in the context of history with respect to the USA.

1 posted on 02/24/2005 10:43:03 AM PST by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: familyop

Who cares? The Brits are all girly-men.


2 posted on 02/24/2005 10:44:44 AM PST by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

"Who cares? The Brits are all girly-men."

Your ignorance is astonishing.

Do you include those Brits who are serving alongside US troops in Iraq?

Shame on you.


3 posted on 02/24/2005 10:49:15 AM PST by oursouls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Why worry over another countries politics. You can't do anything to change the people, so let them elect a leader. If they don't like America, big deal, tell them to get in the back of the line. Our President will do what is best for his people. Europe should do the same.


4 posted on 02/24/2005 10:49:15 AM PST by JeffersonRepublic.com (The 51st state is right around the corner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

"So if the Labour Party over there doesn't win, will we continue to see support in the War on Terror from its most visible leader?"

The USA would get more support from the Tories than from the Labour Party (particularly without Blair - who will likely be gotten rid of by the left within his party at the earliest opportunity)


5 posted on 02/24/2005 10:51:57 AM PST by oursouls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

"So if the Labour Party over there doesn't win, will we continue to see support in the War on Terror from its most visible leader?"

The USA would get more support from the Tories than from the Labour Party (particularly without Blair - who will likely be gotten rid of by the left wing of his party at the earliest opportunity)


6 posted on 02/24/2005 10:52:34 AM PST by oursouls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeffersonRepublic.com

Hey, I've got a good idea...why doesn't the NYT sponsor a letter writing campaign so that Americans can write to some of the undecided Brits and try to influence their vote...it sure seemed like a good idea a few months ago when Ohio voters got inudated with letters from the UK (sarcasm off)


7 posted on 02/24/2005 10:53:53 AM PST by HanneyBean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: oursouls

I would love for the Toris to win, but as long as Howard is their lead man I have to pull for Blair. The Tories have been shameful on Iraq.


8 posted on 02/24/2005 10:55:37 AM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HanneyBean

**"Hey, I've got a good idea...why doesn't the NYT sponsor a letter writing campaign so that Americans can write to some of the undecided Brits and try to influence their vote...it sure seemed like a good idea a few months ago when Ohio voters got inudated with letters from the UK (sarcasm off)"


Now that's a good idea!

Get the American liberals to write to a load of floating voter Brits urging them to vote Labour!

That should guarantee a conservative win!

Well it seemed to work in Ohio.


9 posted on 02/24/2005 10:58:14 AM PST by oursouls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

"The Tories have been shameful on Iraq."

Specifically?


10 posted on 02/24/2005 10:59:05 AM PST by oursouls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: oursouls

I have no reason to believe that claim. The Tories have been behaving in the manner of our Democrat Party. If they win an election on that platform they'll feel no need to reverse course about the war.

Just as Zapatero feels no need to reverse course. Just as Ukraine feels no need to reverse course.

I have no love for the current parties of Labor or Tory, but I do hope Blair wins.


11 posted on 02/24/2005 10:59:11 AM PST by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: familyop
Not sure if this is good news or bad, actually. I've come to respect Blair, even if he's a total wishy-washy pansy on social and moral issues.

I wonder if the Slightly Silly Party will be running any candidates this time 'round?
12 posted on 02/24/2005 10:59:15 AM PST by Antoninus (In hoc signo, vinces †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

MONSTER RAVING LOONY PARTY ALL THE WAY!

http://www.omrlp.com/


13 posted on 02/24/2005 11:01:23 AM PST by kingsurfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker

The tories aren't using Iraq as a major policy platform like Schroeder in Germany did.


14 posted on 02/24/2005 11:02:04 AM PST by GOPGuide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Blair has been a disaster domestically for Britain.

Half of Britain's economic growth comes from the expansion of Government, the HealthCare system is a mess, crime is skyrocketing.


15 posted on 02/24/2005 11:04:03 AM PST by GOPGuide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: oursouls

Ignorance? I'm Irish. Brits are girly-men.


16 posted on 02/24/2005 11:06:43 AM PST by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

No, but that will be the perception to the outside world and more importantly to the terrorists.

On surface objection to the war wasn't the main reason Spain overthrew Azner's party. The government fumbled initial public response and the electorate voted in Zapatero, where before they were going to side with Aznar's successor.

How did the rest of the world view the election? As appeasement to the terrorists and Zapatero rewarded that belief.

In Australia the main argument wasn't the Iraq war, though his opponent was very against it. If Howard has lost, how do you believe the rest of the world would have seen the election? As a referendum on economic and social policy, or a referemdum on the Iraq war?

I guarentee if Blair loses it will be seen as a referendum on Iraq, the WOT and it will not matter if another in country issue dominated the election.


17 posted on 02/24/2005 11:08:23 AM PST by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

Crime is not too bad I think. The health care has been in a mess for while. You are right about the Government expansion. My main problem is their wealth redistribution and their inept social policies.

They only want to help the loafers, layabouts and immigrants. They also go for the Grey vote while ignoring the people that actually work. I hate their ideas for ID cards and their under invesment in the military.


18 posted on 02/24/2005 11:09:49 AM PST by kingsurfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: familyop

The Liberal Democrat party getting 18% is most unsettling part of this poll.

If these numbers are right, it mean Labour and the Libs will have a coaliton government. The British are going to have some pretty far left policies being introduced.


19 posted on 02/24/2005 11:09:50 AM PST by nypokerface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

"Ignorance? I'm Irish. Brits are girly-men."

I am of Irish descent myself.

What difference does it make?

Your statement was ignorant.


20 posted on 02/24/2005 11:10:21 AM PST by oursouls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson