Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Here Comes the Mother-to-Be
NY Times ^ | 3.13.2005 | Mireya Navarro

Posted on 03/12/2005 2:53:11 PM PST by NYC GOP Chick

March 13, 2005

Here Comes the Mother-to-Be

By MIREYA NAVARRO


LOS ANGELES

FOR her wedding last year before 100 guests at the historic Mission Inn in Riverside, Calif., Neomi Padilla, 32, wore a sexy spaghetti-strap dress from L'ezu Atelier in Newport Beach and four-inch heels.

Then she held on for dear life.

At the altar, she was unable to kneel comfortably. "My husband held me because I thought I'd fall," she said. Making her way down a staircase to the reception things got more precarious. Being seven months pregnant, she couldn't see her feet.

Only a few years ago, women planning simultaneously for a wedding and a due date would beg designers and bridal stores for dresses that would camouflage their growing bellies and - if they told anyone at all - would insist on silence. These days, however, brides are not only not hiding their pregnancies, but they are showing them off, celebrating the upcoming birth in vows and toasts, wearing gowns that flatter their bump, and, in short, refusing to give up any elements of a traditional wedding just because there is a baby visibly on the way.

Some bridal gown manufacturers are rushing out maternity designs and officiants are blessing more and more unborn children.

"It is a growing trend," said the Rev. Christopher Tuttle, a nondenominational minister who presides over the National Association of Wedding Officiants - with about 200 members. "It's all become, 'Hey, look at me. I'm pregnant!' "

The Rev. Scott Carpenter, a Unity pastor who presides over another national group of officiants, the National Association of Wedding Ministers, said that eight years ago he never had a bride openly announce her pregnancy, but now those brides account for about 20 percent of the weddings he performs.

At a time when pregnancies are obsessively chronicled and celebrated in celebrity and fashion magazines, it is perhaps not surprising that they are being showcased even as women walk down the aisle. But there are larger cultural factors at work as well: women are getting married older, and many are living with their husbands-to-be for years before exchanging vows.

"They're older, they're more confident," said Carley Roney, editor in chief of The Knot (www.theknot.com), a Web site devoted to wedding planning information. "Oftentimes couples are paying for the wedding, so they don't worry about what people think."

Mrs. Padilla, who runs a family food business in the Los Angeles area and is now the mother of 8-month-old Sophia, said her attitude was, "Why can't I have it all?' " She said she became pregnant after plans for a big wedding were under way, and she decided to stick to them.

"I'm 32, my husband is 34," she said. "We wanted a family, so we weren't embarrassed."

The timing of baby and wedding is not always coincidental. Even though increasing numbers of heterosexual couples live together without marrying, Americans still lean toward marriage once a baby comes because people think it will provide greater security for the child.

But if pregnancies have often led to marriage, they have not always paved the way for full-blown weddings if the bride was far along.

With today's pregnant brides, Ms. Roney said, "It's the flaunting of it where things are taking a turn. We're talking about seven months pregnant."

Or eight. Laura Taylor, 21, of Terre Haute, Ind., said her only concern about her Feb. 12 wedding was that she was cutting it so close to her March due date that she feared she might have the baby before the husband.

Ms. Taylor, who until recently worked as a cashier in a tanning salon, said she had been engaged for more than three years and, upon learning she was pregnant, debated for a week and a half whether to have a big wedding. She decided on "this huge blowout," including a Baptist church ceremony and a reception for 125 guests.

"I just decided, what the heck," she said. "I do things out of order anyway." "I thought about an ivory dress and my mom was, no, you're getting white. It's 2005."

Those who shared the limelight with their unborn babies on their big day say the pregnancy made an emotional occasion even more intense. Jane E. Smith, 38, a director of training and development with InterContinental Hotels and Resorts in San Francisco, said even her guests cried at her wedding last November outside Palms Springs when the minister mentioned her yet-to-be-born son, Miller Michael (who was born Feb. 12).

"It was so unique and so special," said one teary-eyed guest, Jeff Rogers, 38, an information specialist with Nike in Portland, Ore. "I just sort of went, 'Oh, my gosh, there's so much more going on here than just two people getting married.' "

But being pregnant for your wedding is not necessarily the easiest way to go, what with swollen feet, queasy stomachs and multiple dress fittings. Some brides wear fabulous gowns with white sneakers or slippers because they would be too unsteady on heels. Many avoid evening weddings so they do not tire out.

The brides toast with apple juice and switch or postpone honeymoons because they cannot scuba dive or sit on a beach drinking piña coladas. They also don't want to be too far away from their doctors.

Trying to finding the dress, of course, can be a nightmare.

"The most stressful thing I've ever gone through," Ms. Taylor said.

She first went to the store where she had gotten her prom dresses and, she said: "They told me there was no way they could put me in a dress. I felt they didn't want to help me."

At a second shop, "the dresses looked terrible; they were five sizes bigger than what I wear."

Ms. Taylor said she finally found a satin dress with lace overlay that she loved from TeKay Designs (www.tk-designs.com), an online clothing retailer based in Houston that specializes in maternity wedding dresses in the $150 to $800 range.

The company started out in 1998 selling wedding, bridesmaid and prom dresses, but in recent years maternity wedding gowns have sold so briskly that they have become TeKay Designs' specialty, accounting for 60 percent of all sales, or about 300 dresses a year, said Joseph Okyere, director of operations. He said the demand is largely because of the company's wide maternity bridal selection - more than 100 designs - and its relatively low prices.

"In 2000, we started getting calls from pregnant women saying, 'I saw this dress on your Web site, can you custom make it to fit a pregnant woman?' " he said, adding that now the company has "orders coming from all over the world."

Ronald Rothstein, principal owner of Kleinfeld Bridal, the large bridal salon in Brooklyn that sells up to 8,000 wedding dresses a year in the $2,000 to $4,000 range, estimates that 6 to 7 brides out of every 100 who come to his salon are pregnant and will show when they marry.

"It used to be that the bride would call us in advance and say they wanted to talk to us privately," he said. "Nowadays, the bride comes in and says, 'I'm pregnant. What am I going to look good in?' It's just an extra level of excitement."

While pregnant brides say they have found overwhelming support from bridegrooms, parents, friends, officiants and wedding industry vendors, some said social acceptance is not universal.

Joy Lynn Leech, 31, who was seven months pregnant at her wedding last August, said most people were "extremely supportive" but among her 200 guests she noticed some people conspicuously "quiet about the whole thing."

And when she called her Roman Catholic Church she was told that one priest would not marry her but another "would most likely not have a problem."

Mrs. Leech, a volunteer firefighter who owns a pony ride business in New Jersey, got her church wedding - along with a beaded, double-silk organza gown by Jane Wilson-Marquis, a New York designer; horse-drawn carriages; and a big party at Nanina's in the Park in Belleville, N.J. - but she said she was "slightly disappointed" that the baby was not mentioned in the ceremony. She said she did not push it for fear that the accommodating priest would balk at marrying her altogether "because Catholics are so strict."

Christian conservative groups that promote abstinence before marriage, like the Family Research Council and the Christian Defense Coalition in Washington, said that they found it positive that these pregnant brides were getting married, yet they objected to the message they may be sending.

"On one level it is sending the message that sexual activity before marriage doesn't have the kind of harmful emotional, social and economic consequences that can happen," said the Rev. Patrick Mahoney, a Presbyterian minister who heads the Christian Defense Coalition.

Carmela Pampillonia, a restaurant manager in Staten Island who was five months pregnant at her wedding Feb. 13, found her Catholic parish "very accepting" but waited three months for her priest to submit her request for review by his archdiocese. "I couldn't plan anything until they accepted me," she said.

But for brides like Ms. Pampillonia, however, etiquette was not on top of the priority list. "Marriage is supposed to be a symbol of love and unity, and a child brings you more love and unity," she explained. "I showed that belly off all night long and I felt great."


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-151 next last
To: JenB
I'm talking about Sacramentally valid, so that only has to do with those who wanted to be married in the Catholic Church. If they're married in a civil ceremoney, their marriage is legal, but if they truly wanted a marriage in the sense of the Sacrament of Matrimony, they'd need to be able to say that nothing was forcing them into marriage, and having been engaged when the woman got pregnant doesn't always mean that they truly can or will commit to a marriage.

My niece got pregnant when she was engaged, and at first, the father of the baby was willing to speed up the wedding plans, but about a month later, he called to tell her that he didn't really want to be tied down, so he wouldn't marry her. She was devastated, but it was truly the best thing that could have happened. She went ahead and had that little baby girl, who is now a lovely 17 yr. old.

81 posted on 03/12/2005 4:58:41 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: It's me
Not neccessarily, you just described the first year of most marriages. Why not get married at the start? Didn't really think you loved him/her?

First off, living together was semi-accidental. I got sick. Several years before, I had gone through three harrowing weeks, where I'd had pneumonia and been alone. So, I asked (or maybe she offered) to stay and take care of me for a night.... And she never left. Mind you, we were already engaged at this point.

The problem was never a question of if I loved her. Falling in love is the easy part of marriage. It was a question of compatibility. Working together to have a partnership takes work. We wanted to know we could do that.

You're right that it's much like the first year of marriage. OTOH, if we had got married and found out that we were incompatible, it would have been a lot messier and more expensive to get a divorce.

Personally, I consider divorce -- the breaking of a commitment -- to be a more serious concern than whether a bride should be wearing white and the size of her belly.

82 posted on 03/12/2005 5:02:31 PM PST by Celtjew Libertarian (Shake Hands with the Serpent: Poetry by Charles Lipsig aka Celtjew http://books.lulu.com/lipsig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick

Meanwhile, at the reception, that gaggle of "friends" are laughing at you behind your back and calling you Lucky to have conned the guy to marry you.

Oh, yes, dear, tis true....


83 posted on 03/12/2005 5:05:37 PM PST by mabelkitty (Blackwell for Governor in 2006!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta

Woah, tattoos and piercings?? I have tattoos, and allthough I can agree with you about some people getting them for attention, mine are hidden. Some of us don't get tattoos for social acceptance, I got mine because they mean something to me, not to other people.


84 posted on 03/12/2005 5:05:59 PM PST by Laz711 (Fear is the Mind Killer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty

Hmm... I wonder how many of those "friends" are single and jealous.


85 posted on 03/12/2005 5:07:37 PM PST by NYC GOP Chick (www.Hillary-Watch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick

You've got that right.
But wear 4" heels and an immodest dress and you're just asking for ridicule....


86 posted on 03/12/2005 5:08:08 PM PST by mabelkitty (Blackwell for Governor in 2006!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty

'Tis true, but I do have to wonder how much of the "ridicule" comes from jealousy. You know how women can be! ;D


87 posted on 03/12/2005 5:09:16 PM PST by NYC GOP Chick (www.Hillary-Watch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: BellStar
You all know this. Church's are Hospitals for sinners not country clubs for Saints

Forgiveness is available to all who repent, but mercy does not rob justice. If you commit sexual sin, there is a price to be paid before forgiveness is gained, and losing the privilege of receiving the Cahtolic sacrament of marriage would be part of that price.

"Cheap" grace is not part of the Christian equation, though many seem to think it is. In God's vocabulary, "I'm sorry" is a verb.

88 posted on 03/12/2005 5:11:02 PM PST by frgoff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: It's me
I don't know, but I thought white was supposed to symbolize virginity. I guess not anymore.

Only since Victorian times. Before a bride wore what ever color she wanted. The bride wearing white is a pretty new innovation.

89 posted on 03/12/2005 5:12:14 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Res severa est verum gaudium)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: frgoff

Well gee... So much for repentance and acceptance from God.


90 posted on 03/12/2005 5:14:20 PM PST by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Celtjew Libertarian
I think our marriage has been been smoother and worked better for it.

Two things separate us from the animals. One, we use cutlery, and, two, we can rationalize anything.

91 posted on 03/12/2005 5:14:29 PM PST by frgoff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick; All
Of course I remember meeting you -- and I would be honored by that. :)

Just so all you guys know...she's a real hottie...I'm too old for her....but perhaps...there might be some younger gentleman, who would like to hear what she has to say.

I'm older....I trust her.

92 posted on 03/12/2005 5:14:49 PM PST by Focault's Pendulum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: marajade
Well gee... So much for repentance and acceptance from God.

Repentance = sorrow, confession, restitution and forsaking the practice. Acceptance from God comes upon repentance. In other words, it's conditional.

The ultimate goal is to stop the sin, not excuse it by blaming it on a fallen nature or weak flesh.

Some sins we can be totally free from. Fornication and adultery, for example.

93 posted on 03/12/2005 5:25:28 PM PST by frgoff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Laz711

Courage!


94 posted on 03/12/2005 5:27:02 PM PST by Temple Owl (19064)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

Really... She can't be married in the church while pregnant but she can after the baby is born?


95 posted on 03/12/2005 5:27:20 PM PST by HairOfTheDog (It is no bad thing to celebrate a simple life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: frgoff

I know what repentance means and I also know what forgiveness means. To disallow a believer to not commune with God because of a past sin which has been repented of is not an organization to which I would like to worship with. Makes God out to be rather small and petty instead of large and loving. I know which kind of God I'd rather believe in, thanks.


96 posted on 03/12/2005 5:28:16 PM PST by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick; cyborg

(OK, so it's a prom dress. You get the idea)

97 posted on 03/12/2005 5:28:26 PM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyborg

"Always a pregnant bridesmaid, never a pregnant bride."


98 posted on 03/12/2005 5:29:03 PM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Lord have mercy.


99 posted on 03/12/2005 5:29:54 PM PST by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

heh!


100 posted on 03/12/2005 5:30:11 PM PST by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson