Skip to comments.
SAAMI weighs in on ammunition serial numbering scheme
SAAMI ^
| 4/26/05
| SAAMI
Posted on 05/05/2005 2:18:30 PM PDT by BCR #226
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
FYI and spread it around to all the sites you guys go on... we need to get the word out.
Mike
1
posted on
05/05/2005 2:18:30 PM PDT
by
BCR #226
To: BCR #226
SAAMI offered to take members of the Legislature, including Sen. Dunn, and the Attorney General's office, on a tour of an ammunition manufacturing plant. Regrettably, neither Sen. Dunn, nor the Attorney General's office availed themselves of this opportunity to learn first-hand why this proposal is infeasible.In other words, "Don't confuse Sen. Dunn or the AG with the facts; they've got their minds made up."
The cost of ammunition would increase from pennies now to several dollars per cartridge. It is sheer, uninformed fantasy to suggest that costs would only increase by half a cent.
That is, of course, the unspoken but true aim of that serialisation requirment; if they can't ban ammunition de jure, they'll make it so expensive as to have a de facto ban.
2
posted on
05/05/2005 2:25:15 PM PDT
by
Kretek
To: gieriscm; Joe Brower
3
posted on
05/05/2005 2:25:19 PM PDT
by
BCR #226
To: BCR #226
I heard about this ridiculous leftist scheme to put more pressure on gun owners. What these power-and-control freaks will come up with next. They are so blinded by their objective of disarming free Americans, they have no clue about the how,why,cost,impact, etc.
SOCIALIST MORONS!!!
4
posted on
05/05/2005 2:26:10 PM PDT
by
EagleUSA
To: BCR #226
5
posted on
05/05/2005 2:27:05 PM PDT
by
G.Mason
( Because Free Republic obviously needed another opinionated big mouth ... Proud NRA member)
To: BCR #226
I've been reading about this bill. What are it's chances of passage?
6
posted on
05/05/2005 2:27:32 PM PDT
by
Arkie2
To: Arkie2
Chances of passage are very good. The legislature is dominated by leftists who haven't met a gun (or ammunition) control bill they didn't love. It's already passed out of one committee, and will be heard in the appropriations committee. It will likely pass. I'd have to look it up to see exactly what the status is today, but I wouldn't be at all surprised if it passes. Now, the question is, will Arnold sign it? He signed the bill last year banning .50 BMG rifles, but vetoed a bill tacking on a per round tax on ammunition.
7
posted on
05/05/2005 2:31:45 PM PDT
by
.38sw
To: .38sw
I hope it fails because Kalifornia shows the way for the leftists in the other states and we could expect to see this nonsense spread. Is the NRA involved in this fight?
8
posted on
05/05/2005 2:37:16 PM PDT
by
Arkie2
To: BCR #226
It would cost nothing to file off the number if I was going to use the round in a killing. Sheeesh!
9
posted on
05/05/2005 2:39:30 PM PDT
by
muir_redwoods
(Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopeckne is walking around free)
To: Arkie2
I don't know how involved they are. I got an alert in my email, but other than that, I don't know what they're doing.
10
posted on
05/05/2005 2:40:41 PM PDT
by
.38sw
To: BCR #226
Right...and everyone who makes their own bullets is going to have to laser engrave them..
Not to mention they deform upon impact...and every bullet has to have its own serial number?
How many zillions of bullets will be made this month?...
and what about foreign bullets...we will refuse to allow anyone to import them..
This is simply more back door gun grabbing by the commies
who hate America and want to disarm honest citizens
in order that there will be no one to resist criminals
of either type..(sanctioned and unsanctioned)
imo
11
posted on
05/05/2005 2:40:55 PM PDT
by
joesnuffy
(The generation that survived the depression and won WW2 proved poverty does not cause crime)
To: muir_redwoods
Well, yeah, but the intent is not to actually help with solving crimes, the intent is to make it more expensive and difficult for law-abiding citizens to own guns.
12
posted on
05/05/2005 2:42:19 PM PDT
by
.38sw
To: BCR #226
Instead manufacturers would have no alternative but to abandon the California market.
I suspect this is exactly what the AG is hoping for. The state, of course, would be exempt from the law so police and the privileged would be uneffected. Even if the gun lobby does sue the state over this the state could keep it in court for years. There's NO up side to this situation even for those who would want to outlaw guns. They'll be caught in the societal degradation thats certain to follow.
13
posted on
05/05/2005 2:44:08 PM PDT
by
556x45
To: .38sw
"Well, yeah, but the intent is not to actually help with solving crimes, the intent is to make it more expensive and difficult for law-abiding citizens to own guns."Why on earth do they continue to piss-off the people who are already armed? Not good tactics
14
posted on
05/05/2005 2:55:50 PM PDT
by
muir_redwoods
(Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopeckne is walking around free)
To: 556x45
If the firearms and ammunition manufacturers had any guts, they'd abandon the California market now. If all the manufacturers agreed not to sell to any California based enterprise, including local police, sherrifs, CHP, National Gaurd organizations, perhaps the outcry from these groups would be enough to shut up the AG.
To: 556x45
Instead manufacturers would have no alternative but to abandon the California market. I'm sure that no black market would spring up to fulfill the demand for ammo.
/sarcasm
16
posted on
05/05/2005 2:59:30 PM PDT
by
Disambiguator
(This tagline should only be taken under the advice of your doctor.)
To: muir_redwoods
Why on earth do they continue to piss-off the people who are already armed?That's the good cause reason that state senator Don Pistol Pakin' Perata gives on his application for his concealed carry permit. He believes that he is in danger by crazed gun-owners due to his support for gun control measures. He has one of the very few ccw permits in Alameda county.
17
posted on
05/05/2005 3:00:51 PM PDT
by
.38sw
To: TPluth
If the firearms and ammunition manufacturers had any guts, they'd abandon the California market now. That's what Ronnie Barret did.
18
posted on
05/05/2005 3:06:10 PM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: BCR #226; Vaquero
It looks as if I ought to buy a reloading kit early for Father's Day, huh.
Consider the word spread.
19
posted on
05/05/2005 3:12:20 PM PDT
by
AZ_Cowboy
("Be ever vigilant, for you know not when the master is coming")
To: DuncanWaring
I wrote Mr. Barrett personally on the matter. It was outrageous that the Sheriff out there (Was it L.A.?) would acquire one of his guns solely to frighten the masses and push for gun control with it. It has always been (and will always remain) the shooter, not the equipment, who makes the shot count.
Barrett Rifles
20
posted on
05/05/2005 3:17:36 PM PDT
by
AZ_Cowboy
("Be ever vigilant, for you know not when the master is coming")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson