Replies

ping

Good work, nicely done!

Clinton had multiple chances to capture Bin Laden including the time he was expelled from Saudi Arabia and when the Sudanese kicked him out. What is more troubling is that most of the country does not see Clinton's inactions regarding bin Laden as a violation of his Constitutional Oath of Office and thus criminal. At very least Clinton should be indicted for his failure to protect us from the terrorists throughout and after his term in office.

1. How would any of this be at all different from the NEA sex education policy delivered to students via e-mail???

2. How would any of this be at all different from the ACLU constantly molesting the Boy Scouts in court?

3. How would any of this be at all different from a Gay Pride parade in downtown Anytown, USA???

4. How would any of this be at all different from having pornography accessible in public libraries???

5. How would any of this be at all different from having a potential presidential candidate who dresses up like a girl???

IT GETS CURIOUSER AND CURIOUSER..........

Info overload!

Nice job, Mia!

With this cat out of the bag(closet) and all this information being exchanged and given new relevance, could other buried stories emerge before the election?

You come closer to understanding the Clinton psyche than anyone. It is absolutely frightening to consider the damage wrought by his presidency during those eight l-o-n-g years. And now we continue as a nation to be scuttled about as the Clintons frantically try to rewrite the past, while at the same time attempting to orchestrate events so that they can lay their claims to America's present and future.

Thank you, Mia T, for continuing to stand for the real truth.

Once again, your usual outstanding job. Thanks for taking the time to put all of this together.

Your focus on the phrase "kill him" which was used repeatedly by clintoon, reminds me that he is a student of the infamous mass manipulator Tony Robbins. Mr. Robbins teaches NLP (Neuro Linguistic Programming), a technique that uses words to create impressions.

For example, in the Chris Wallace interview, clintoon repeatedly said, "I have never criticized the Bush administration in their handling of the was on terror." He then went on to criticize; do exactly what he said he never did.

The effect of this technique on the unsuspecting mind is that (1) clintoon never criticized Bush, so any criticism of him is unjustified, and (2) his criticism if factual.

I wonder how many nights Tony Robbins spent in the Lincoln bedroom while coaching der slick miester.

The purple mafia will be after you. bttt

......surely the perpetrators would have sprung it closer to Election Day.......

I can appreciate the potential tie to Clinton but doubt that is the motive.

Foleygate is but one of the series of exposes to which we will be subjected. Others will follow. The depth and coordination indicate a very high level of premeditation.

The goal is to capture the news of the day to preempt the good news emanating from the economy, the low gas prices, the soaring stock market and the consolidation of political factions in Iraq into a more cohesive government.

Then there is the October surprise. A good Rat induced scandal early on will allow a later Republican induced scandal to be labeled a 5 minute retribution make up.

The cause is not Clinton. The cause is the Rats who are at war with America.

Ostracize a Democrat at least once a day. Make them feel bad about themselves. Lower their self esteem. Megohm realize they are mostly dirt under the feet of decent Americans.

Your right on again Mia T. Great info.... did you run across this:

http://www.progressivestrategies.net/introduction/partners.asp

I just want to look at Gogo instead.

Good work. Bump.

Bump!

Interesting...

Any evidence or discussion as to whether Foley was one of the 900 FBI files? I'm not sure when Foley took office and if the dates might coincide.

part 2 ping

SEE RAHM DANCE
THE CLINTON-FOLEY NEXUS: A THEORY _{part 2}

by Mia T, 10.14.06

ahm Emanuel, ballet dancer, "operations researcher," "pit bull," ¹ clinton operator still ²-- Chicago pol ³ in tights meets the clinton jackboot ²⁸ -- appeared on This Week with George Stephanopoulos last Sunday. While it was not the stagily self-conscious performance of bill clinton on Fox two weeks earlier, ⁴like clinton's performance, it was embarrassingly amateurish by today's standards. ⁵ Stylistically, as well as functionally.

The pirouette and grand jeté were clumsy, obvious--primitive leftovers from the churlish clinton years. ²⁹ Because Emanuel tried to spin us silly with unsubtle non sequitur, ("never saw 'em"), he managed only to further convince us that he... along with the clintons... were the likely prime movers of the Foley hit. ⁶

When it comes to slicing and dicing his Republican foes, Emanuel applies a Chicago pol's sensibility that recalls that famous Untouchables line: "He pulls a knife, you pull a gun; he sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue." Connecticut Representative Rosa DeLauro describes Emanuel as a "reflection of Chicago politics, ward politics. It's local, ethnic. You're not in a tea party." Colleague Ed Markey, a veteran House member from Massachusetts, says simply, "He's not a political romantic."

Rahm Emanuel, Pitbull politician
Monday September 25, 2:15 pm ET
By Nina Easton, Fortune Washington bureau chief
Fortune

WHAT WE KNOW

We know Emanuel meets with clinton to talk strategy at least once a month. He told us so. ⁷
We know aids of top Democrats ⁸ and CREW ²²(the Soros-funded Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington) shopped the Foley story with the media months before it broke.
We know there is a clinton-CREW connection.

CREW was founded by Democrat activists Norm Eisen and Louis Mayberg. Eisen is an attorney. Mayberg is president and co-founder of the Bethesda, MD mutual fund management firm ProFund Advisors LLC.

CREW's 990 IRS filing for 2001 lists its three founding directors as Louis Mayberg, Mark Penn and Daniel Berger. Mayberg and Berger are prominent Democrat donors. Mark Penn is a top Democrat strategist and pollster.

Penn played a decisive role in Bill Clinton's 1996 campaign, and served as head of message and strategy for Hillary Clinton's 2000 Senate campaign. Penn is a fellow of Simon Rosenberg's New Politics Institute (NPI), an important Shadow Party think tank. He is president and co-founder of the polling firm Penn & Schoen Associates. ²³
We know when the clintons were in the White House, they had in their possession the raw FBI files of almost 1000 Republicans. ⁹
We know the clintons reflexively destroy anyone in their way.

We know the clintons routinely employ a 'secret police' to investigate the 'enemy' and intimidate them into submission. ¹⁰

"Crucial to this protective wall was the secret police, a group of private detectives hired to protect hillary and 'Saturday night bill.' Their tactics included digging up dirt on women who might be linked to bill in order to cow them into silence. There is even some evidence of possible physical intimidation.": HEAR DICK MORRIS
"I got the letters from Pellicano to these women intimidating them. I had tapes of conversations from Pellicano to the women. I got handwritten letters from the women.": [Pellicano played a critical role in Mr. Clinton's 1992 presidential campaign by "suppressing" "inconvenient" accounts from several women, by concocting fraudulent "proof" (later discredited) that Gennifer Flowers doctored the damning tape of clinton, and again inside the clinton operation in January 1998, four days after the Monica Lewinsky story broke, to falsely paint Monica as simply a lying stalker, a claim later discredited by clinton's own DNA.]
MARY MATALIN
1997, CBS
There is reason to believe that he is a rapist ("You better get some ice on that," Juanita Broaddrick says he told her concerning her bit lip), and that he bombed a country to distract attention from legal difficulties arising from his glandular life, and that... [f]urthermore, the bargain that he and his wife call a marriage refutes the axiom that opposites attract. Rather, she, as much as he, perhaps even more so, incarnates Clintonism
GEORGE WILL
SLEAZE, THE SEQUEL

The rape took place while Bill was running for governor. Hillary came bursting into the room to talk to two people, one of whom I personally know. She said "You won't believe what this [expletive] did now. He tried to rape some b*tch." It was the job of these two to squelch the story.

doug from upland to Sean Hannity
WABC, 10/16/00

Given the silence from the West Wing, Mrs. Broaddrick this week sought answers from Hillary Clinton, whose telescopic feminism apparently sees injustice to women everywhere except the kind which occurs closer to home.

In a letter to Mrs. Clinton recalling their meeting shortly after the reported assault occurred, she wondered about the significance of Mrs. Clinton's words to her at that time. Thank you, Mrs. Broaddrick says Mrs. Clinton told her, for "everything you do for Bill."

"What did you mean, Hillary?" her letter continued. "Were you referring to my keeping quiet about the assault I had suffered at the hands of your husband only two weeks before? Were you warning me to keep quiet?"

The not-so-subtle implication of the letter is that Mrs. Clinton is, in fact, her husband's enabler. Dealing with her husband's promiscuity and worse might keep her from dealing with the important issues facing the people of New York, namely her candidacy. One might call it a Faustian bargain except that even Mephistopheles might not lower himself to sign such a deal....

COMPLETE ARTICLE
Did he rape that woman, Juanita Broaddrick?
The Wall Street Journal
EDITORIAL
October 18, 2000

I remember it as though it was yesterday. I only wish that it were yesterday and maybe there would still be time to do something about what your husband, Bill Clinton, did to me. There was a political rally for Mr. Clinton's bid for governor of Arkansas. I had obligated myself to be at this rally prior to my being assaulted by your husband in April, 1978. I had made up my mind to make an appearance and then leave as soon as the two of you arrived. This was a big mistake, but I was still in a state of shock and denial. You had questioned the gentleman who drove you and Mr. Clinton from the airport. You asked him about me and if I would be at the gathering. Do you remember? You told the driver, "Bill has talked so much about Juanita", and that you were so anxious to meet me. Well, you wasted no time. As soon as you entered the room, you came directly to me and grabbed my hand. Do you remember how you thanked me, saying "we want to thank you for everything that you do for Bill". At that point, I was pretty shaken and started to walk off. Remember how you kept a tight grip on my hand and drew closer to me? You repeated your statement, but this time with a coldness and look that I have seen many times on television in the last eight years. You said, "Everything you do for Bill". You then released your grip and I said nothing and left the gathering.

What did you mean, Hillary? Were you referring to my keeping quiet about the assault I had suffered at the hands of your husband only two weeks before? Were you warning me to continue to keep quiet? We both know the answer to that question.

Yes, I can answer Brit Hume's question. You are the same Hillary that you were twenty years ago. You are cold, calculating and self-serving. You cannot tolerate the thought that you will soon be without the power you have wielded for the last eight years. Your effort to stay in power will be at the expense of the state of New York. I only hope the voters of New York will wake up in time and realize that Hillary Clinton is not an honorable or an honest person.

I will end by asking if you believe the statements I made on NBC Dateline when Lisa Myers asked if I had been assaulted and raped by your husband?
Or perhaps, you are like Vice-President Gore and did not see the interview.: DO YOU REMEMBER?
AN OPEN LETTER TO HILLARY CLINTON
BY JUANITA BROADDRICK
SUNDAY OCT 15, 2000

We know the clintons abuse power to destroy their foes. ¹¹
And we know the Foley hit job hit the fan a bit too early for its apparent purpose, but it materialized just in time to knock clinton terrorism failure ²⁴^,²⁵ off the front page and out of the voter's mind.¹²

PAYBACK

If Rahm Emanuel and the clintons orchestrated the Foley hit job--and circumstantial evidence suggests that they did--then it is they who sacrificed "the children" for power... (and treasure: Rahm racked up 18 mil in less than two years post-clinton, a stash he, himself characterizes as a pre-emptive supplementation of the projected paltry (i.e., disclosed, real-time, legal) take as a politico; ¹³ it is unclear exactly when the clintons amassed their fortune. ¹⁴^,¹⁵^,¹⁶^,¹⁷^,¹⁸^,¹⁹)

So, Emanuel was hired by Bruce Wasserstein, a man who has contributed over $200,000 to the Democratic Party since 1990 (see campaign disclosure information here, here, here, and here), and subsequently made about $18 million in less than three years while working for Wasserstein's firm.

They took care of their boy. It is so Chicago. ²⁶

WHAT TO DO?

Should Rahm Emanuel and hillary clinton, therefore, resign?
Should they be voted out of office?
Have they committed any criminal acts?
What exactly are the Soros ²⁰ and Simon & Schuster ²¹ connections, anyway? (And are they criminal?)
And isn't the War on Terror and the clinton-Democrat utter failure to confront terrorism ²⁷ the only issue that matters in the end?

Rahm Emanuel and the clintons are attempting, as is their wont, to exploit sex to distract the voter. (A case can be made that sex-as-decoy was the clintons' salvation in 1998.)

Voters across America, as well as voters in New York and Illinois, must focus on the crucial issue of our time, the War on Terror. They must not fall prey to ruthless and dangerous demagogues.