Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ruling Allows Navy to Continue Using Low-Frequency Sonar
NAVY newsstand ^ | Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Brandan W. Schulze

Posted on 08/21/2007 6:43:16 PM PDT by SandRat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 08/21/2007 6:43:21 PM PDT by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SandRat

>> Schregardus said claims that SURTASS LFA destroys ocean life and cannot be operated in harmony with the environment are “simply untrue and not supported by scientific fact.”

Navy 1, Greenpeace 0

(I presume it was Greenpeace that sued them, or somesuch.)

Good news!


2 posted on 08/21/2007 6:46:12 PM PDT by Nervous Tick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

I don’t know what your reason for posting this here is, but the evidence against this type of sonar is pretty damning and well documented. Frying whales brains with sonar is an incredibly sick endeavor.


3 posted on 08/21/2007 6:48:07 PM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
This ruling spares the National Marine Fisheries Services headquarters from a much deserved naval bombardment.


4 posted on 08/21/2007 6:49:38 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Imagine that! A court that thinks protecting Americans might just be as important as protecting whales.


5 posted on 08/21/2007 6:50:57 PM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Good. Now we need a final final ruling that they can just use it, period. No restrictions. No permits. No expiration dates. Why do we allow peons to dictate national security policy?


6 posted on 08/21/2007 6:53:02 PM PDT by LilAngel (No blood for quislings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander
I don’t know what your reason for posting this here is, but the evidence against this type of sonar is pretty damning and well documented. Frying whales brains with sonar is an incredibly sick endeavor.

3 posted on 08/21/2007 6:48:07 PM PDT by JerseyHighlander

Imagine that. Depth charges and hedgehogs during WWII were also damaging to underwater animals. Well, I'll be damned, they survived WWII, we survived WWII, and the Nazis and Japs didn't.

7 posted on 08/21/2007 6:54:30 PM PDT by american_ranger (Never ever use DirecTV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

Thanks for posting, Sandrat. I think that protection of America from foreign intruders is high on my list of priorities. Some foks don’t get it and probabaly never will. Hopefully, we will be able to track diesel submarines in the future.

A retired diesel submariner.


8 posted on 08/21/2007 6:55:12 PM PDT by encm(ss) (USN Ret.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander

Fried whale brains? You’re making me hungry.


9 posted on 08/21/2007 6:58:00 PM PDT by LilAngel (No blood for quislings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander

“I don’t know what your reason for posting this here is, but the evidence against this type of sonar is pretty damning and well documented. Frying whales brains with sonar is an incredibly sick endeavor.”

How many lives of American sailors are you will to sacrifice? 10? 100? 1,000? How many?


10 posted on 08/21/2007 6:58:34 PM PDT by navyguy (Some days you are the pidgeon, some days you are the statue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander

>> the evidence against this type of sonar is pretty damning and well documented.

Since that is (in your mind) true, I’m sure you won’t have any problem posting links to back up your assertions.

>> Frying whales brains with sonar is an incredibly sick endeavor.

Insinuating that the USN uses sonar for the purpose of “frying whale brains” is an incredibly naive and asinine assertion.


11 posted on 08/21/2007 7:02:23 PM PDT by Nervous Tick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

You got that right. Any good cook knows you need a cast iron pan and plenty of lard. ; )


12 posted on 08/21/2007 7:10:13 PM PDT by LilAngel (No blood for quislings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LilAngel

>> need a cast iron pan and plenty of lard.

Lard? Why not blubber?


13 posted on 08/21/2007 7:13:11 PM PDT by Nervous Tick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander
"I don’t know what your reason for posting this here is, but the evidence against this type of sonar is pretty damning and well documented. Frying whales brains with sonar is an incredibly sick endeavor."

That's complete hogwash. Didn't you ever notice that these claims are always found on web sites that also have "Bush used explosives on the world trade center", "windmills are wiping out birds" and other moonbat conspiracy theories on them?

14 posted on 08/21/2007 7:14:22 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

Thanks. These new computer inventions are mind boggleing. Who knows? Next thing you know we’ll be talking through wires!


15 posted on 08/21/2007 7:16:31 PM PDT by encm(ss) (USN Ret.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander

STFU


16 posted on 08/21/2007 7:24:07 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

Silly me. I haven’t made fried whale brains lately. I fry just about everything in lard, so just didn’t think of the blubber. I guess I should step aside and leave the cooking to you. I’ll just bring the collard greens, seasoned with a little ham hock.


17 posted on 08/21/2007 7:26:59 PM PDT by LilAngel (No blood for quislings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander
Please explain how low frequency sound waves can "fry" anything? Could you please post some of the "well documented" evidence?
18 posted on 08/21/2007 7:30:32 PM PDT by Justa (Politically Correct is morally wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LilAngel

>> I’ll just bring the collard greens

Collard greens & ham hock! Now you’re making ME hungry!

(Funny how everything tastes better cooked in real animal fat. There’s no tastier way to make refried beans, as just ONE example...)


19 posted on 08/21/2007 7:33:52 PM PDT by Nervous Tick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

1. I would eat fried whale brains
2. Read the amicus brief by the International Whaling Commission in this case. Also read this: http://www.history.navy.mil/library/online/sonar_mammal.htm
3. The Navy couldn’t and still hasn’t tried to deny the fact the Low frequency sonar is killing many many whales within range when ever the LFA sonar is pinged.
4. This is different than prior situations because the sonar is radiating outward many nautical miles within certain layers of the ocean, and are affecting the entire population of whales in the area.


20 posted on 08/21/2007 7:34:28 PM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson