Posted on 11/23/2009 8:00:46 PM PST by Man50D
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS, Southern District for Alabama and Northern District for Florida served with Grand Jury Presentments
American Grand Jury has incorporated the Fitzpatrick criminal complaint and the Nancy Pelosi criminal conspiracy complaint within its Presentments.
The American Grand Jury Criminal Presentments have now been hand-delivered by Process-Service to the Clerk of the United States District Court, Charles R. Diard Jr., Mobile, Alabama [serve affidavit by Donald Gaines] and the Clerk of the United States District Court, William M. McCool, Pensacola, Florida [serve affidavit by Norman Caron] .
The “Affidavits of Process-Serve” can be seen here at the American Grand Jury business website
The criminal charges of Eligibility Fraud and Treason (Barack Obama) and Conspiracy of Election Fraud (Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama) are now pending before these and numerous other Courts.
If acted upon, the Grand Jury Presentments would require that both Obama and Pelosi be criminally prosecuted.
American Grand Jury is actively pursuing decisions in a number of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS located in multiple jurisdictions: District for Columbia, Tennessee, Alabama, Florida, Kansas, New York, Texas, California, Arizona, Connecticut and others.
More serves will be forth coming.
You can help American Grand Jury in our mission of serving and demanding the Judiciary act upon the Criminal Presentments by visiting here:
bump
The Marxists in our nation are experts at scamming.
Well, I guess we can all just wish that some judge somewhere will grow a pair.
""Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."'
As much of a piece of crap Bacrock is, how is he guilty of treason? Where are the two witnesses to the act?
Well..., it might have made a difference if this were a “real” grand jury, instead of a group of people playing around like they are part of the legal system... LOL...
I’m not sure of this “Grand Jury” and their definition, but giving aid and comfort to the enemy is EXACTLY what 0bama has been doing since election night 2008.
First - as a closet Muslim
Second, with his condemnation of Israel
Third, but requiring our soldiers to read terrorists “their Miranda Rights” when captured on the battlfield.
Fourth, but restraining the rules of engagement, particularly in Afghanistan that precludes firing on even high-value targets if civilians might be hurt.
Fifth - by providing a platform for terrorists to spout their hate speech and beliefs through public trials in civilian courts.
Sixth, but violating the US Constitution on several levels.
And the list can be lengthened.
I looked it over before, a few years ago, and it was nothing and had no connection to the legal system (no more connection than you or I sitting at home, that is...).
It’s just a group of people using a cool sounding name and pretending that they’ve got some authority, but they don’t.
I can look up the information again, but it was a few years ago that I looked into it, a long time before Obama ever came around.
“but they don’t”
Well, I guess they don’t if you say they don’t...
Does it matter what the constitution says?
By his own admission, Barry Soetoro was never eligible to run for POTUS. It matters not one bit where he was born. What matters is that both his parents were American citizens when he was born — hence McCain was qualified even though born in the Canal Zone, and Soetoro did not qualify no matter where his mother hatched him. That is, unless his father really isn’t Barak Sr of Kenya, as Barry declared in two autobiographical accounts. Then we got a whole other kettle of fish. Get me some of the Kenyan DNA, please!
BUMP!
This could become the largest citizens arrest in history.
Well, I guess they don’t if you say they don’t...
I wasn't saying it based on my own authority, but on the basis of the information that I got from other sources, when I looked it up a few years back. I will have to look up information about them again to post it here. Give it a day for me to research it out again.
Does it matter what the constitution says?
It matters and I haven't found anyone, yet, to this point in time -- where they say that the requirements for office, per the Constitution, doesn't matter. That's never been the issue. The issue has always been that while one group says that Obama doesn't meet the requirements the other group says he does.
That's the problem, not the Constitution.
And that's precisely why I've said, all along (since right after the election) that the only way to solve this problem is to pass state laws making it a requirement for a candidate to show his birth certificate or else he cannot be placed on the ballot.
That bill was going through several states, including mine, where I was also lobbying for that to pass. It didn't pass this session but I've got hopes for it next session in our legislature.
Again, no one has disputed the requirements of the Constitution be upheld. It's been a dispute between "two sides" as to whether it's been met or not. And that's how I have proposed solving it.
“Does it matter what the constitution says?
About what the Constitution says about citizen grand juries, not about Obama’s eligibility. The courts could decide the later if they were forced to.
About what the Constitution says about citizen grand juries, not about Obama’s eligibility. The courts could decide the later if they were forced to.
Ahhh... wrong subject... :-) Okay, on the grand jury info... I said up above I was going to go back and get that information again. I looked into it a few years ago. I'll have to go back and do it again. I'll get back with further information.
That doesn't invoke a lot of confidence in the point you are trying to make here on this thread.
I'm confident in the point that I was making, in that this "organization" is not part of any legal system that we have in this country. They just picked a name, say that they are a "grand jury" and go around the country "making news" (as best as they can). That's about it. Nothing much more happens (that is, nothing happens in the legal system that results in anything, legally).
And, you know..., this is something that anyone can research out. It doesn't take me to do it, but as I said, I would.
I happened to be gone for most of the day yesterday and probably today, too. I guess I'll be gone out most of the business day today, and might check back in on posts a couple of times.
When I do get back home (probably over Thanksgiving holiday), I'll get into digging it up. But, please..., anyone else feel free to dig into it, too, before I get back to do it myself. It's not private information that is out there about the group, but public.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.