Posted on 07/14/2016 7:37:57 AM PDT by Cheerio
Conservative critics of President Barack Obamas nominee to head the Library of Congress were blindsided Wednesday when a key Republican engineered her lopsided confirmation by the Senate despite concerns she is, in the words of one opponent, an unqualified, far-left progressive.
The Senate voted 74-18 to confirm Carla D. Hayden, who leads Baltimores public library system, as the 14th librarian of Congress.
Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., rushed Haydens nomination to the floor even as Blunts office declined to answer The Daily Signals inquiries Wednesday morning about the status of the nomination.
U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote
(go to link)
All 18 senators who voted no on Hayden are Republicans, as are seven of the eight senators who did not vote.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailysignal.com ...
She is the one who has no problem with porn in library right?
The Marxist movement has effectively rendered conservative librarians extinct, the stern hushes now being reserved for innocent conservatives instead of the troublemaking Leftists.
Any Senator could have blocked this correct?
My senator, a RINO through and through. I will be voting democrat against him this fall.
So WHO on his staff is the homosexual/anti-American/liberal plant?
It’s a library for gods sake. Must everyone clutch pearls over everything? Perhaps worried about raising late fees? This is zero concern for me. Republicans were smart to confirm. It’s like the least important role in government.
Librarians are expert in classification. Let’s rate them by their librarian skills.
They will now brag about how they are true conservatives.
The incinerators will run overtime cleaning out the Library ,all the History must Go
“CLASSification”
Good one!
I think you need to do bit of research on what the job Head of Library of Congress entails.
Much larger and more influential than you may think.
Also a place where someone wanting to create mischief can do much damage under the radar screen.
“This is zero concern for me. Republicans were smart to confirm. Its like the least important role in government.”
They give in on everything. They pretend to be conservatives and brag about how conservative they are.
And then they support every thing the democrats want to do.
This is just one example of the weak, cowardly Republicans in Washington. This is not the most important position in the government. But the Republicans give in on everything. This is just one more example of the Republicans supporting the democrats.
These days the library is a free place to babysit your kids after school. Technology is making them otherwise obsolete.
Small potatoes.
In a state-run media article, a key word or two, included or oddly absent, is what points to the real story. The rest is camouflage.
The real story is an answer to the question, "Since this is a Democratic appointment, what kind of corruption is being evinced here--installing a visionary saboteur with vast contacts and credentials, or rewarding a time-server?" In this case, the answer appears to be "time-server."
Thanks for pointing out the significance of this position to the appeasers. A few frogs in the pot have long passed the boiling stage :(
Mark Kirk?
One of the gang of 20 who confirmed Loretta Lynch.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.