Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump, asked if he'd attack North Korea, says: 'We'll see'
AP via The Sacramento Bee ^ | September 3rd, 2017 | By ERIC TALMADGE and CATHERINE LUCEY

Posted on 09/03/2017 9:53:18 AM PDT by Mariner

TOKYO - North Korea on Sunday claimed a "perfect success" for its most powerful nuclear test so far, a further step in the development of weapons capable of striking anywhere in the United States. President Donald Trump, asked if he would attack the North, said, "We'll see."

The latest provocation from the isolated communist country reinforces the danger facing America, Trump had said earlier in a series of tweets, adding that "talk of appeasement" is pointless.

"They only understand one thing!" Trump wrote, without elaboration, as he prepared to meet later with his national security team. It was the first nuclear test since Trump took office in January.

Hours later, after attending church in Washington, the president made his "We'll see" comment in response to a question from reporters.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nknukes; nknuketest; nkoutofcontrol; third100days; trump; trumpasia; trumpnatlsecurity; trumpnk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Let me be the first to say:

I advocate for a pre-emptive strike against Norklandia.

That strike should include, at least, tactical nuclear bunker busters.

And we should ensure the entire world knows that we will engage in existential war with anyone who tries to stop us.

Because Norklandia nukes and missiles are an existential threat to the USA. And they are being wielded by a madman, in an insane regime who constantly threatens our annihilation.

1 posted on 09/03/2017 9:53:18 AM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mariner

What happens when he confirmably MIRV’s his thermonukes..?

I really don’t think deterrance would work the same with Norklandia.

In fact..?

It might not work AT ALL.

Waiting to find out is....a bad idea.


2 posted on 09/03/2017 10:02:25 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
I wonder if there is any way to hack those missiles so they land back on Nork, OR what would be interesting, make it look like a malfunction and it heads west and detonates over Beijing. DOH! Then we offer our services to China to take out Tubby.


3 posted on 09/03/2017 10:05:23 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Trump: Greatest POTUS of all time solely for preventing Satan taking office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Time to move another division’s division artillery to the DMZ, add another THAAD, send an Aegis destroyer and mobilize the 82nd Airborne.


4 posted on 09/03/2017 10:08:56 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Think not of what the left thinks. We already know. Hindsight will always be 20-20. Was Viet Nam worth it? GIVING Iraq to Iran? I think Pat Buchanan might have it right. What does it gain us?


5 posted on 09/03/2017 10:09:22 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Boxed in, NK has several targets in mind and will play the MAD game. Seoul and other parts of SK are a concern in the mediate, however targeting the Takahama nuclear power plant would create more wide-spread destruction, (All without firing a nuke). NK can hit that with ease if they sense any type of attack coming.


6 posted on 09/03/2017 10:15:01 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

No bomb can achieve what a tweet can. /s


7 posted on 09/03/2017 10:15:10 AM PDT by Jyotishi (Seeking the truth, a fact at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Should a pre-emptive strike and the potential commitment of 10s of thousands of US troops be something debated by the people’s representatives in Congress as opposed to the decision of a single person?


8 posted on 09/03/2017 10:15:57 AM PDT by oincobx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oincobx

Send a cruise missile over the Capital with leaflets “we will feed you like an American” over throw the oppressors of the people! That would be a wake up call little Kim can understand.


9 posted on 09/03/2017 10:23:07 AM PDT by jonathan-swift2000 (The Good news from Iraq the MSM won't publish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Don’t spoil the surprise.


10 posted on 09/03/2017 10:34:06 AM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oincobx

Congress long ago ceded debate on matters of war to the executive.

And wrongly so.

POTUS can do whatever he pleases for 60 days according to the War Powers Resolution. All he has to do is inform the top 8 members and cite imminent threat.

Making the case for “Imminent threat” is easy in this case.

In strategic war, 60 days is beyond forever.


11 posted on 09/03/2017 10:34:11 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rollo tomasi

You assume they have a missile that can get through the shield and hit with enough power and accuracy to cause a melt in the containment vessel.

Nay, their deterrent is a nuke on Seoul. And they count on the South refusing the US permission.

What they do not realize is the US will put its interests above that of the South, or even Japan, and strike hard and quick.

We must eliminate the threat to the US.


12 posted on 09/03/2017 10:39:12 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

There is little or no point to a preemptive strike that doesn’t result in the unification of Korea.

If they decide to go, they must go all the way.


13 posted on 09/03/2017 10:44:46 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
"You assume they have a missile that can get through the shield and hit with enough power and accuracy to cause a melt in the containment vessel."

Yes, courtesy of China/Russia (Rabbit hole goes deep, why did Putin order an evacuation in/around Vladivostok on August 28) and the fact that Takahama is not the most stable nuke plant around. That place goes, then the jet stream makes sure most of Japan gets a radioactive "bath".
14 posted on 09/03/2017 10:56:33 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rollo tomasi

American leaders should have acted long ago, when the Norks were just getting started. The lesson of Neville Chamberlain was never learned by the Bushes, Clinton & Obama. Appeasement with a mad megalomaniac has never worked and never will.

My take on Kim Un is he loves to push the envelope, but is not exactly suicidal. He likes eating and drinking too much to commit suicide. I am betting on him NOT launching weaponized rockets towards US and it’s allies. He is playing the same game the Norks have played for decades, which is to threaten crazy actions and get all sorts of aid and concessions from USA.


15 posted on 09/03/2017 10:58:33 AM PDT by entropy12 (Why Republicans woo & pursue people who will never vote for them (liberals & media) ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

True, kicked the can awhile ago, now this/next generation has to deal with a rogue nuke State. Of course you are going to be called an “isolationists” because you defy the sanctions/Chamberlain approach.


16 posted on 09/03/2017 11:01:56 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
"He likes eating and drinking too much to commit suicide."

Also correct, likes Western movies, western high class prostitutes, the NBA, and video games. Just mainly big-time China's (And perhaps Russia's a little bit) puppet.
17 posted on 09/03/2017 11:08:11 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Once the missles fly, the war’s over. All you can do is make peace with God.


18 posted on 09/03/2017 1:56:10 PM PDT by DownInFlames
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mariner; All
I agree with a pre-emotive strike. However, using tactical nukes...

Headline: "Trump starts nuclear war!"

19 posted on 09/03/2017 2:38:51 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’d opt for carpet bombing using B1B Lancers, BUFFs., and clean up with KC130s and Cobras.


20 posted on 09/03/2017 2:42:26 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson