NON print version:
To try to make guns not exist in your mind is insane. Terrorists and criminals will ALWAYS have guns. Count on it.
Of course she did.
What a stupid thing to say. Once something has been invented it cannot be “un-invented”.
It’s a silly as someone saying: If TVs did not exist no one would have to watch Andrea Mitchell...
A non-trivial number of school mass murders had non-gun backup plans. Columbine in particular included several LP-cannister bombs set around which would have killed >2x more if they’d worked.
Largest mass murders didn’t use guns.
If democrats and idiot media airheads did not exist we wouldn't have terror, either.
Wanna work with me on that?
Tell Andrea to give up any armed security at her business and her home.
Anyone who starts a conversation like this is prone to magical thinking. They want to build on a base that cannot exist in reality. They are not rational and cannot be reasoned with.
“If the guns did not exist, you would not have had the terror, the massacre that you had.”
Tell that to the people Mao, Chavez, Stalin, Pol Pot Hitler, Mussolini...... killed.
Throughout the brief interview, she argued that the Second Amendment was not absolute
Now can we Regulate and License Presstitutes that use High Capacity Transmission Devices to spread Lies and Propaganda
If guns did not exist....there would still be swords, knives, axes, spears, clubs.
In ancient Greece even a beggar was allowed to have a spear.
The gun genie escaped the bottle 700 years ago and will not go back in.
I always remember Julio Gonzalez, who could not get a gun to kill his x-girlfriend, so, using a gallon of gasoline and a match, he burned down the Happyland Dance Club killing 89 people.
Would it have been better if he had been able to get a gun and kill his X and maybe her boyfriend and spared the other 87 patrons?
Um, no.
If guns did not exist, then he would have used something else, like a car, or bomb, or chemical weapons.
People were killing each other just fine before guns came along and would continue to do so if guns ever ceased to exist.
Hey, Andrea—is “the right to privacy” and its foundation for abortion “absolute”? Say—maybe ABORTION “should not exist at all”. Just sayin . . .
SUMMARY OF D.C. V. HELLER
https://www.cga.ct.gov/2008/rpt/2008-R-0578.htm
“According to the Court, the ban on handgun possession in the home amounted to a prohibition on an entire class of ‘arms’ that Americans overwhelmingly choose for the lawful purpose of self-defense. Similarly, the requirement that any firearm in a home be disassembled or locked made it impossible for citizens to use arms for the core lawful purpose of self-defense. These laws were unconstitutional under any of the standards of scrutiny the Court has applied to enumerated constitutional rights.
But the Court did not cite a specific standard in making its determination, and it rejected the interest-balancing standard; proposed by Justice Breyer, and a rational basis standard.
The Second Amendment right is not absolute and a wide range of gun control laws remain presumptively lawful, according to the Court. These include laws that:
(1) prohibit carrying concealed weapons,
(2) prohibit gun possession by felons or the mentally retarded,
(3) prohibit carrying firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings,
(4) impose conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms,
(5) prohibit dangerous and unusual weapons,
(6) regulate firearm storage to prevent accidents.
Justice Scalia wrote the majority opinion. He was joined by Justices Alito, Kennedy, Roberts, and Thomas.
If GUN-FREE zones did not exist, "you would not have had the terror, the massacre that you had."
It's far easier to ban gun-free zones than suck up every firearm that exists. That would of course require heavy-handed tyrannical measures and far more than 17 innocents will die.
How about, if metal did not exist, if wood did not exist, if uranium did not exist, if oil did not exist.
It is childish fantasy, simplistic and dangerous thinking.
How many untold lives are saved by guns everyday.
These hypocrites are surrounded by men wearing guns.
They take money from Hollywood creeps who, when not raping women, are making movies glorifying guns.
They also take money from Silicon Valley liberals who make psychotically violent software where teenagers shoot thousands of humans across a screen for hours and hours every day.
Fact, gun deaths have been dropping for years, while gun ownership has been rising. This is bad law resulting from a hysterical reaction from a terrible crisis that only happened because of the unconscionable dereliction of duty by the FBI.
If the Pentagon was as derelict as the FBI, we would have been nuked by the Soviets in the 60’s.
Terrorists would just go “BACK TO” ,Bow & Arrow ,Swords ,Knives etc etc