Posted on 03/01/2018 11:52:39 PM PST by Enchante
As our lawsuit continues, so do our forensics. New computer investigative tools have become available, and grains of evidence have been solidified into forensic mountains. Our evidence involves multiple computers and government I.P. addresses discovered improperly residing in them.
That brings us to the news.
Not long ago, my forensics team asked if I used that Apple computer after the IG returned it. My team was conducting a new exam. “No,” I replied, “it hasn’t functioned since before I gave it to the IG. I just stored it when they returned it. Why?”
“Because — that’s not your hard drive inside the computer they gave back to you,” they told me. “… We know the serial number on the hard drive when you bought it. We recorded the same serial number on our earlier forensics exams. This is a different hard drive. Completely different serial number. Not even close.”
I would never have known if we hadn’t gone back in that computer for additional forensics.
In addition to somebody changing the scope of the IG investigation midstream, and the office withholding from me the notes and the report on my own complaint, somebody also switched out my hard drive before the IG returned it to me.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
They slow-rolled, narrowed, and totally botched/punted the investigation of govt intrusions into Sharyl Attkisson's computers. THEN they switched out the hard drive of one of her computers while it was in their possession!!!
Prolly mirrored the drive and kept the original.
This information seriously undermines hopes that the IG office of DOJ will prove to be any kind of “white hat” in the upcoming report. They may well be doing simply damage control and dishonestly limiting and distorting their reporting of FBI and DOJ malfeasance.
If Sharyl Attkisson’s experiences mean anything (and they do), then the IG cannot be counted upon to do anything except try to minimize problems for DOJ with public and Congress.
This information seriously undermines hopes that the IG office of DOJ will prove to be any kind of “white hat” in the upcoming report. They may well be doing simply damage control and dishonestly limiting and distorting their reporting of FBI and DOJ malfeasance.
If Sharyl Attkisson’s experiences mean anything (and they do), then the IG cannot be counted upon to do anything except try to minimize problems for DOJ with public and Congress.
Nothing more nefarious than that? They could have changed/inserted any kind of “evidence” to affect ongoing legal proceedings.
I’m only speaking to the different serial #s.
Yes, thanks. I’m simply wondering whether it was a minor switch (identical mirrored content) or whether any evidence was changed....
Yes, thanks. I’m simply wondering whether it was a minor switch (identical mirrored content) or whether any evidence was changed....
Good question.
Would love to know what exactly happened Attkinson. She’s a good egg.
Nah, clearly the IG is the one and only agency/ office of government that isn’t corrupt.
/s
If the IG was capable of achieving any sort of effective outcome whatsoever, Attorney Genital Sessions wouldn’t use it at all.
The entire government stinks of sh!t.
That would be encrypted/compressed and hidden with some type of Trojan to unencrypt it and decompress it X months later as a hidden directory of kiddie porn or the account info to a couple hundred thousand in “untaxed income” to destroy the owners life.
Seriously, government officials who are clearly caught doing this should get the death penalty. It would behoove even the most innocent and unobtrusive citizen to record the serials of all major hardware components in computers they own as a defense to this type of subversion.
True, govt “forensic” investigators could ruin almost anyone’s life so easily. Very few would have the knowledge, preparation, or resources to fight back.
If there was anything of value to investigators on that drive they should have retained it and the original machine it was in, not return the computer with a different drive to the owner of the computer. If there's nothing on it that they believe has value as evidence there's no reason not to return the original to her.
Makes me wonder if they can produce the original drive or if they've destroyed it.
Clear indications that the DOJ’s IG office may be completely untrustworthy when it comes to investigations>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Since the Obama liberal fascists have NOT been stopped, Civil War II is about to begin.
My thoughts as well.
Another example of government run amok. This is not the government we are supposed to have. The Constitution (remember that quaint document?) gives the power to the people and defines LIMITED government.
How much longer will we tolerate these abuses? President Trump is only one man and all of the Swamp is against him 24/7. He needs our help.
Exactly. With all the obscene scandals about the FBI lab and mishandling of so much evidence over the years, one would have hoped that all areas of federal investigations had been revamped with the most rigorous evidence handling standards.
That seems not to be the case!!
I fear you are right. I had rested my hopes on an honest DOJ IG, and an aggressive Jeff Sessions.
These are the highest of high crimes and felonies possible in a republic, a nation of laws. The betrayal of trust by those responsible for enforcing the supreme law of the land constitutes an overthrow of the sovereign, We the People. Outside of bills of attainder, Congress has tremendous power to deal with this assault. But, of course, it won’t.
The day these criminals from Obama on down to Strzok and Page are exonerated will mark the formal end of the republic and the beginning of authoritarian America.
Further voting will be a waste of time little more important than voting was in the Soviet Union.
Poor Sharyl.
Everything always seems to happen to her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.