Skip to comments.
WHY DOES PETER STRZOK WANT TO TALK TO HOUSE COMMITTEE?
shameless vanity
| 6-23-2018
| wayoverontheright
Posted on 06/23/2018 7:57:35 AM PDT by wayoverontheright
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
To: wayoverontheright
How long, if ever, before we see orange jumpsuits for these outrageous felonies against the Constitution?
21
posted on
06/23/2018 9:04:02 AM PDT
by
A strike
(Natural events are just God moving His stuff around.)
To: bkopto
Beat me to it.
And you can bet that the press will give a gazillion times more coverage to what he says,than what they gave it IG Horowitz.
22
posted on
06/23/2018 9:05:37 AM PDT
by
independentmind
(Sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt me.)
To: wayoverontheright
He DOESN’T want to talk to the House Committee. They’ve offered him several dates and time and scheduling options, but he has refused. Finally, they resorted to a subpoena which, if I understand correctly, was served yesterday.
He’s been saying he wants to testify; he lies.
To: bkopto
Exactly. He thinks he can pull an Ollie North.
24
posted on
06/23/2018 9:17:49 AM PDT
by
proust
("The rule is, jam tomorrow and jam yesterday, but never jam today.")
To: wayoverontheright
Bottomline: What is the worst crime he can be charged with and convicted of?
And what is the maximum sentence for that?
History: The sentences in Watergate were surprisingly short.
To: truth_seeker
Participating in a coup d’tat is treason
To: wayoverontheright
Strzok is confident and not intimidated by what he thinks are politicians groping in the dark trying to piece it all together.
Don’t expect anything to come of this.
27
posted on
06/23/2018 9:33:12 AM PDT
by
Para-Ord.45
(Americans, happy in tutelage by the reflection that they have chosen their own dictators.)
To: The Great RJ
Clear his name..what a joke. He knows he is being thrown under the bus to protect higher ups. He may want to cut an immunity deal.I strongly believe that Strzok is a cooperating witness and that he cut his deal with USA Huber many months ago. His texts are indefensibly incriminating, and he had no choice.
28
posted on
06/23/2018 9:37:10 AM PDT
by
Always A Marine
("When you strike at a king, you must kill him" - Ralph Waldo Emerson)
To: wayoverontheright
First to answer the inevitable question as to why Peter Strzok is still employed by the FBI. Because Inspectors General, in this case Michael Horowitz, cannot "interview" former employees, only current ones,That is why AG Sessions assigned United States Attorney Huber to team up with DOJ IG Horowitz. There are two things USA Huber can do which IG Horowitz cannot:
1. Compel testimony of any person (in or out of DOJ) before a grand jury; and
2. Bring indictments for crimes.
29
posted on
06/23/2018 9:43:59 AM PDT
by
Always A Marine
("When you strike at a king, you must kill him" - Ralph Waldo Emerson)
To: Kozy
He wants full use immunity. He isn’t getting that.According to news reports earlier this week, Strzok will testify before the committee without immunity. I think Strzok has already made his deal with USA Huber and betrayed his higher-ups to the grand jury.
30
posted on
06/23/2018 9:47:57 AM PDT
by
Always A Marine
("When you strike at a king, you must kill him" - Ralph Waldo Emerson)
To: truth_seeker
Bottomline: What is the worst crime he can be charged with and convicted of? And what is the maximum sentence for that?Sedition. Death.
31
posted on
06/23/2018 9:49:55 AM PDT
by
Always A Marine
("When you strike at a king, you must kill him" - Ralph Waldo Emerson)
To: A strike
How long, if ever, before we see orange jumpsuits for these outrageous felonies against the Constitution? NEVAH!
32
posted on
06/23/2018 9:58:43 AM PDT
by
varon
(Run the conspirators to ground)
To: Dutch Boy
Here the other thing. Does Strzok have something on some of the Rinos in leadership? Does he think he can pull the same type of crap that J Edgar Hoover did?
33
posted on
06/23/2018 3:14:05 PM PDT
by
grumpygresh
(Abolish administrative law. It's regressive, medieval and unconstitutional!)
To: wayoverontheright
I do not trust Strzok to tell the truth
34
posted on
06/27/2018 11:45:59 AM PDT
by
blueyon
(The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
To: Kozy
He wants full use immunity. He isn’t getting that. Even if he got immunity, he would not be immune from Arkancide.
35
posted on
07/29/2018 7:32:28 PM PDT
by
Mark17
(Genesis chapter 1 verse 1. In the beginning GOD....And the rest, as they say, is HIS-story)
To: varon
Unfortunately, I have to agree with you.
36
posted on
07/29/2018 7:34:22 PM PDT
by
Mark17
(Genesis chapter 1 verse 1. In the beginning GOD....And the rest, as they say, is HIS-story)
To: proust
He’s not fit to shine Ollie North’s shoes.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson