Skip to comments.
Court of Appeals Upholds New Jersey Law Banning 15-Round Mags
GunsAmerica Digest ^
| 12/6/18
| Max Slowik
Posted on 12/07/2018 7:17:49 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
If 3-10 round mags are just as good as 2-15 round mags, why is the an exception for LEO? And does the 14th Amendment PROHIBIT different treatment of different people?
To: PROCON
2
posted on
12/07/2018 7:18:17 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Twitter is Trump's laser pointer and the DemocRats are all cats.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
I guess 30’s and 40’s are okay.
3
posted on
12/07/2018 7:19:19 AM PST
by
SkyDancer
( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Ok, so lets limit books to 10 pages.
To: Blood of Tyrants
“The law makes an exemption for active-duty members of the military and police and retired law enforcement officers”
Ah. Got it. The Sikh Freak Grewal thinks some pigs are more equal then others.
5
posted on
12/07/2018 7:21:24 AM PST
by
Regulator
To: Blood of Tyrants
Sex change ok, must be paid for by the government and they must be allowed to use whatever restrooms they want but you cant have 15 round mags because were concerned about the culture.
Idiots.
6
posted on
12/07/2018 7:23:53 AM PST
by
Skywise
To: Blood of Tyrants
“... three 10-round magazines are just as good as two 15-rounders.”
So, next year it’ll be...thirty 1-round mags will be “just as good as” three 10-round mags.
7
posted on
12/07/2018 7:24:24 AM PST
by
moovova
To: Blood of Tyrants
The courts once again making it clear that the Constitution is meaningless.
8
posted on
12/07/2018 7:25:18 AM PST
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
To: Lurkinanloomin
Meaningless to them.
One day they will realize that they themselves are meaningless.
9
posted on
12/07/2018 7:27:11 AM PST
by
Olog-hai
("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
To: Blood of Tyrants
"They said that a magazine-capacity limit does not present a burden to self-defense."
If that were true then there would be no reason for LEOs or the military to have magazines larger than 10 rounds. More importantly, if a ten round magazine isn't a burden for a defender, then it isn't a burden for an attacker either. So how does it help prevent mass shootings then?
Are the judges foolish enough to think that an attacker would be "burdened" but a defender wouldn't?
To: Blood of Tyrants
"...NJ AG Gurbir Grewal..."
It must be tough for decent gun owners living in that utter leftwinger state.
11
posted on
12/07/2018 7:30:27 AM PST
by
Blue Jays
( Rock hard ~ Ride free)
To: moovova
“arguing 2-1 that three 10-round magazines are just as good as two 15-rounders.”
Then if they are “just as good” then they will just ban the 10 rounders too.
12
posted on
12/07/2018 7:34:06 AM PST
by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneo)
To: Blood of Tyrants
If they are just as good then why can’t you just have a 30 round mag instead of 3 ten rounders? Up is down, down is up, inside out.
13
posted on
12/07/2018 7:35:04 AM PST
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: Bonemaker
**Then if they are just as good then they will just ban the 10 rounders too.***. Thats part of the plan. The article states the counsel wants to eventuLly ban all private weapons. “ Never underestimate the power of human stupidity - Mark Twain?
14
posted on
12/07/2018 7:41:51 AM PST
by
Ikeon
(Sadly, the sheep just voted a wolf as the head chef in their own house. whats for dinner? mutton)
To: Blood of Tyrants
They said that a magazine-capacity limit does not present a burden to self-defense. Only lawyers-turned-judges with very limited real-world experience could make such a ill-informed statement and impose their view on the subjects of NJ.
they must
destroy
any magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds.
How illogical and dishonest, such destruction is indeed a surrender.
retired law enforcement officers have training and experience that makes them different from ordinary citizens
Such a classification fails because it is based on a false assumption. Even if true, however, it improperly supposes the subjects of NJ (ordinary citizens) either do not have such qualifications or are incapable of acquiring such qualifications.
Coming to a neighborhood near you?
15
posted on
12/07/2018 7:42:08 AM PST
by
frog in a pot
(Result of many state bailouts? Taxpayers elsewhere in America get to finance the Left's growth.)
To: frog in a pot
iirc, ny came up with max 7. The court said they must have pulled that number out of their ....
To: Blood of Tyrants
A federal appeals court upheld New Jerseys magazine-capacity-limit laws, arguing 2-1 that three 10-round magazines are just as good as two 15-rounders. They said that a magazine-capacity limit does not present a burden to self-defense. If three 10-round magazines are just as good as two 15-rounders, then why ban 15 rounders?
17
posted on
12/07/2018 7:53:21 AM PST
by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: Blood of Tyrants
because retired law enforcement officers have training and experience that makes them different from ordinary citizens They are different and need extra rounds because they can never hit their target?
18
posted on
12/07/2018 7:53:33 AM PST
by
FoxInSocks
("Hope is not a course of action." -- M. O'Neal, USMC)
To: Blood of Tyrants
I live in NJ...
So what am I supposed to do with all of my Beretta 92 mags that hold 15 rounds?
I don't think Beretta makes a modification nor do they sell 10 round mags for this gun.
Can I legally still go to my range with my 15 round mags loaded with only 10 rounds...?
Probably not.
19
posted on
12/07/2018 7:58:06 AM PST
by
Victor
(If an expert says it can't be done, get another expert." -David Ben-Gurion, the first Prime Minister)
To: Victor
"So what am I supposed to do with all of my Beretta 92 mags that hold 15 rounds?"
Turn them in. You won't be needing them anymore. The state will protect you. Trust them.
20
posted on
12/07/2018 8:04:15 AM PST
by
Psalm 73
("I will now proceed to entangle the entire area".)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson