Posted on 12/10/2020 8:52:24 PM PST by rintintin
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A federal judge Thursday cast doubt on President Donald Trump’s lawsuit that seeks to overturn Joe Biden’s win in Wisconsin, declaring it “incredible” that Trump didn’t raise the issues before the election and that siding with him would be “the most remarkable ruling in the history of this court or the federal judiciary.”
Trump is pursuing extraordinary attempts to overturn Biden’s win with a pair of lawsuits in Wisconsin, in federal and state courts. In the state case, Trump wants to disqualify more than 221,000 ballots and in the federal case he wants to give the GOP-controlled Legislature the power to name Trump the winner.
(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...
U.S. District Judge Brett Ludwig, a Trump appointee, marveled at the president’s request at Thursday’s hearing. Ludwig said he hoped to rule in the next couple of days.
Makes me wonder all these wonderful judges Cocaine Mitch appointed if they aren’t nothing but the judges that Obama wanted to appoint and just left in the wings. This asshats rulings is libtarded as libtarded can be!
If o can not charge someone with murder before they do the crime how old you file a claim before the election was st.....the judge wold have thrown it out because no crime was committed yet
you said: “As Yosarrian said...”Some Catch, That Catch 22”....”
Yes, “Catch a 22”
In other words, you don’t have any control, we decide everything you must do, because we hold “Catch a 22”.
SOOOO If this ‘judge’ were to be ruling of a horrendous auto accident-—He would demand that the plaintiffs bring their case BEFORE the accident even happens??????
Of course it’s too late! You must challenge election fraud *before* the election, when you have no evidence and the case will be tossed out. If you challenge *after* the election your evidence is useless, because you are too late.
When and why did we allow the judiciary to become infested by termites?
yes
it’s essentially blaming the victim
but its weirder than that
because the state also demands we should trust them when it comes to fair and accurate elections
so bringing the charges of election fraud without any evidence or witnesses/affidavits, or just a concern you believe people are going to steal an election,
this same government is going to then come back at them and say, where’s your proof? and then deny them any relief because the state isn’t satisified with their concerns.
yup
the court’s objections are rendered moot by these actions
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.