Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judge casts doubt on Trump’s Wisconsin lawsuit
AP ^ | Dec 10 2020 | Scott Bauer

Posted on 12/10/2020 8:52:24 PM PST by rintintin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: rintintin

U.S. District Judge Brett Ludwig, a Trump appointee, marveled at the president’s request at Thursday’s hearing. Ludwig said he hoped to rule in the next couple of days.

Makes me wonder all these wonderful judges Cocaine Mitch appointed if they aren’t nothing but the judges that Obama wanted to appoint and just left in the wings. This asshats rulings is libtarded as libtarded can be!


41 posted on 12/11/2020 12:38:46 AM PST by The MAGA-Deplorian (It is the Trump way! It is the only way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintintin

If o can not charge someone with murder before they do the crime how old you file a claim before the election was st.....the judge wold have thrown it out because no crime was committed yet


42 posted on 12/11/2020 3:03:22 AM PST by blueyon (`nt to be a nothing burger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFret.

you said: “As Yosarrian said...”Some Catch, That Catch 22”....”

Yes, “Catch a 22”

In other words, you don’t have any control, we decide everything you must do, because we hold “Catch a 22”.


43 posted on 12/11/2020 5:21:47 AM PST by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

SOOOO If this ‘judge’ were to be ruling of a horrendous auto accident-—He would demand that the plaintiffs bring their case BEFORE the accident even happens??????


44 posted on 12/11/2020 9:54:55 AM PST by ridesthemiles ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

Of course it’s too late! You must challenge election fraud *before* the election, when you have no evidence and the case will be tossed out. If you challenge *after* the election your evidence is useless, because you are too late.

When and why did we allow the judiciary to become infested by termites?


45 posted on 12/11/2020 11:46:32 AM PST by Samuel Smiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

yes

it’s essentially blaming the victim

but its weirder than that

because the state also demands we should trust them when it comes to fair and accurate elections

so bringing the charges of election fraud without any evidence or witnesses/affidavits, or just a concern you believe people are going to steal an election,

this same government is going to then come back at them and say, where’s your proof? and then deny them any relief because the state isn’t satisified with their concerns.


46 posted on 12/11/2020 12:14:49 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: funfan

yup

the court’s objections are rendered moot by these actions


47 posted on 12/11/2020 12:15:40 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rintintin
It's an AP story... SLANTED LEFT.. FAKE NEWS!


48 posted on 12/11/2020 12:54:22 PM PST by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson