Posted on 07/18/2023 10:27:04 AM PDT by CFW
When did Tupac become a judge?
He was killed in 1996 according to Wikipedia.
In the current threads, we have Tupac and UFOs…
Tupac went from a nopac to now having an impac?
I know he’s dead. It was a rhetorical question.
I never heard Tucker state definitively that Epps was a government agent or informant. I heard him question why Epps wasn’t treated like others and speculate whether it was because he was a government agent.
LOL!!!
Even the nuts on the J6 inquisition were defending Epps so you know he’s an insider working for the deep state.
He got smoked in LV. Biggie got his too….
Maybe Biggie shouldn’t have released the track “Who Shot Ya”…
Great analysis. Thanks for sharing!
Interesting article.
The only possible explanation is that Fox has already agreed to pay him off the way they paid off Dominion.
"Got bills and you need money fast? Call 1-800-SUE-FAUX" ... hell they could even have a "Sue Faux" actress pimping the call line.
I’d mentioned this before. The allegation that you are a federal agent is unlikely to be found to be defamatory.
That he incited some of the J6 action might be defamatory IF it were untrue.
Yeah, but the point of the article is, even if he came out and said Epps was a “fed”, and even if he said this knowing it was false, that doesn’t rise to the standard of defamation, since saying someone cooperates with law enforcement, or is employed by law enforcement is not a slanderous charge to a “right-thinking person”, which is the legal standard.
It’s COINTELPRO 2.0, with white, conservative pro-life Christians the new Black Panthers, Weathermen and SDS. And new FBI with a strong desire to kill.
They misspelled “cRap.”
“....Here, plaintiff alleges that Shakur’s song “Against All Odds” falsely accuses him of “working as an undercover federal informant” and that, as a result of this accusation, he has suffered damage to his reputation and been placed in danger. (Compl.¶¶ 18-19) Even accepting that the statements at issue are false and caused plaintiff injury, however, plaintiff's claim must be rejected. In order to be libelous under New York law, a false statement must hold the plaintiff up to ridicule or scorn in the minds of “right-thinking persons”; those who would think ill of one who legitimately cooperates with law enforcement officials are not such persons.......”
May there be some right thinking people who remain on juries.
And Wiz Khalifa too.
I’m hoping an Andy Kaufman thread pops up…
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.