Skip to comments.
PM Sharon: Too Bad Bush Wasn´t Around In The 30´s
Arutz 7 ^
| 10 March 2003
Posted on 03/10/2003 11:56:20 AM PST by anotherview
PM Sharon: Too Bad Bush Wasn´t Around In The 30´s
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon praised the determination of US President Bush and his administration in its drive to rid the world of Saddam Hussein. "If, in the 1930's," Sharon said at a Likud Knesset faction meeting today, "there had been a leadership so determined to fight dictatorial regimes, it is likely that we, the Jewish Nation, would not have had to pay [the price of the Holocaust]. At times like these, it is important to realize that."
MK Yuval Shteinitz (Likud), who was officially voted in as Chairman of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee today, said today that it's not true that the U.S. has threatened not to give Israel advance warning of the assault on Iraq. Israeli media reported today that the "abundant chatter" by IDF and government officials about when the war would start had angered the U.S., which decided as a result to "punish" Israel. Shteinitz said, "I met yesterday with a senior American official, and he did not give the slightest hint that there was a problem
I also don't think that the generals spoke too much; it was rather the headlines in the newspapers that made all the noise. In truth, it is only natural for Israelis to take great interest in the war and when it will be
"
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: arielsharon; determination; georgewbush; holocaust; israel; presidentbush; saddamhussein
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Why can't the Europeans see how true this is?
To: anotherview
Because the Europeans are as much anti-Semitic today as they were in the 30's. What is truly amazing is that the Jews in the entertainment industry are not behind this war. Semper Fi
2
posted on
03/10/2003 12:03:11 PM PST
by
kellynla
(Once a Marine...)
To: dennisw; TopQuark; Alouette; veronica; weikel; EU=4th Reich; BrooklynGOP; Jimmyclyde; Buggman; ...
"If, in the 1930's," Sharon said at a Likud Knesset faction meeting today, "there had been a leadership so determined to fight dictatorial regimes, it is likely that we, the Jewish Nation, would not have had to pay [the price of the Holocaust]"
Middle East list
If people want on or off this list, please let me know.
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: anotherview
Why can't the Europeans see how true this is? Beats me.
5
posted on
03/10/2003 12:07:30 PM PST
by
Terriergal
("what does the LORD require..? To ACT justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God. ")
To: anotherview
it is likely that we, the Jewish Nation, would not have had to pay [the price of the Holocaust]. What Jewish nation? Israel was established in 1948. In the 1930s Jews were citizens of many countries in Europe not citizens of a Jewish nation.
6
posted on
03/10/2003 12:16:21 PM PST
by
Paleo Conservative
(This space left intentionally blank.)
To: anotherview
To carry the analogy a step further, Israel is the Great Britain of the 30s. During the Clinton years it effectively stood alone against Islamic terror.
To: Paleo Conservative
Actually, most European nations in the 1930s considered Jews a separate nationality, not citizens of their countries. Even where they were citizens, their documents were stamped "Jew" and they were considered foreigners. My mother's French password bears the stamp "JUIF" in bright red letters.
Actually, that is the whole point of Zionism. There is, was, and always will be a Jewish nation. When we lost our homeland we didn't give up our national identity, even though almost 1,878 years went by. So, yes, "Jewish nation" is appropriate.
To: Paleo Conservative
What Jewish nation? Israel was established in 1948. In the 1930s Jews were citizens of many countries in Europe not citizens of a Jewish nation. "Nation" in the older sense, not nation-state. Like the "Cherokee nation", etc.
9
posted on
03/10/2003 12:32:46 PM PST
by
Salman
To: anotherview
If, in the 1930's," Sharon said at a Likud Knesset faction meeting today, "there had been a leadership so determined to fight dictatorial regimes, it is likely that we, the Jewish Nation, would not have had to pay [the price of the Holocaust] Hear, hear!
To: kellynla
What is truly amazing is that the Jews in the entertainment industry are not behind this war. You must not know many Jews. My state (Maryland) has one of the highest concentrations of Jewish people in the USA, and only recently have any substantial numbers started to see the wisdom of voting conservative.
Also, many hard-left anti-American intellectuals are non-religious Jews, like Noam Chomsky.
Its somewhat akin to lemmings jumping over a cliff to their death. It makes little sense, considering that left-wing Marxist/socialism (which includes Nazism) is the root of much of the genocide committed against Jews, and anti-semitism has florished in socialist states around the world.
11
posted on
03/10/2003 1:52:40 PM PST
by
FirstTomato
("In the end,We will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends" M L King)
To: FirstTomato
Oh I know many Jews and your points are well taken but either the ignorance and/or the pacifism of the Jewish in America is still baffling. There are still many Jews alive today who survived the concentration camps and their children should know better.
12
posted on
03/10/2003 1:58:27 PM PST
by
kellynla
(Once a Marine...)
To: Paleo Conservative
I was wondering the same thing....Hope I'm missing something, otherwise a great quote has been mooted.
13
posted on
03/10/2003 2:23:29 PM PST
by
Cosmo
(Liberalism is for girls)
To: anotherview
A curious question. Would Israel exist if there never was a Holocaust?
14
posted on
03/10/2003 2:55:36 PM PST
by
finnman69
(!)
To: finnman69
Would Israel exist if there never was a Holocaust?Probably not.
To: finnman69
Would Israel exist if there never was a Holocaust? Yes. Not exactly where it is and as it is, but it would exist.
16
posted on
03/10/2003 3:02:58 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(Theorems link concepts: Proofs establish links)
To: finnman69
Would Israel exist if there never was a Holocaust?Definitely yes. The Balfour Declaration and other British government documents from the 1910s and 1920s made it clear that they supported a Jewish state in what is now Israel.
To: anotherview
it was rather the headlines in the newspapers that made all the noise.So the inflammatory headlines stating that we were telling Israel not to defend herself in case of attack were a media lie? Damn the mainstream press for their 24/7 anti-Bush mischief-making.
18
posted on
03/10/2003 4:17:56 PM PST
by
Ragtime Cowgirl
("Americans do not turn away from duties because they are hard." - Pres. GW Bush)
To: finnman69
Yes, for sure. It may have come about a bit later than 1948 were it not for The Holocaust, however.
19
posted on
03/10/2003 4:27:46 PM PST
by
College Repub
(http://www.collegehumor.com)
To: kellynla
This is true. I am amazed by the anti-Semitic talk. It's looking like 1936 Germany.
20
posted on
03/10/2003 4:38:42 PM PST
by
mingwah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson