Skip to comments.
U.S. Archbishop: Using Contraception is Always ‘Evil’
LifeSite News ^
| 6/5/18
| Lisa Bourne
Posted on 06/10/2018 6:42:31 PM PDT by marshmallow
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 201-217 next last
To: CondoleezzaProtege
... the sacred act of sex
Is this why my wife says OH GOD!!! so much??
101
posted on
06/12/2018 7:04:10 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Mrs. Don-o
WHEEEeee!!!
I'm glad THAT's over!
Now we got three weeks of FUN!!!
102
posted on
06/12/2018 7:05:35 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: metmom
" Their prayer lives are not the reason they are doing the NFP."
"You seem to be missing the point in a big way."
You, first of all, don't know whether their prayers lives are the reason they are doing the NFP. Their prayer life may be centrally involved in the process and the motivation--- and usually is, at least as far as I can see.
Second, the impulse to attribute non-prayerful, non-God-pleasing reasons for NFP, even among the most ardent of believers --- who are the very ones most likely to opt for NFP --- shows a most unattractive reflex to assume the worst of others, rather than be best.
Third, all the NFP literature I have seen (from the Christian, rather than the health/selfcare/medical sources) emphasizes the importance of prayer and utter reliance on God.
You are very much mistaken about these people. Please, dear metmom, consider this in your heart.
103
posted on
06/12/2018 7:06:13 AM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
("Let us commend ourselves, and one another, and our whole life, unto Christ Our God.")
To: Mrs. Don-o
A free will directred toward contraception is in conflict with Gopds Will, as expressed both is Biblical teaching and in Natural Law.If you folks REALLY believed GOD wanted sex for procreation; you'd 'abstain' for 3 weeks instead of ONE!!
104
posted on
06/12/2018 7:07:00 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Mark17
105
posted on
06/12/2018 7:07:37 AM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
("Let us commend ourselves, and one another, and our whole life, unto Christ Our God.")
To: Mrs. Don-o
In direct defiance of what Paul wrote; Rome’s ‘Mary’ is described as PERMANENTLY abstaining; while her husband is permanently deprived; even of NFP.
106
posted on
06/12/2018 7:09:48 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: metmom
There was a thread some time back about a Catholic couple, who agreed to live in a platonic, sexless marriage, and they were championed for it. There is a cult (maybe that word is a bit strong) that embraces the idea of a Jewish couple. One that lived in a platonic, sexless marriage; claiming that is such a holy and ideal state to be in.
107
posted on
06/12/2018 7:12:38 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Mrs. Don-o
Neither did Jesus or St. Paul, both of whom were, like Naumann, celibate.And you KNOW this about Paul; HOW?
108
posted on
06/12/2018 7:15:44 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Mrs. Don-o
Reading and posting in this thread has given me an urge to get off this computer and awaken the wife...
109
posted on
06/12/2018 7:17:23 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Elsie; Mrs. Don-o
If you folks REALLY believed GOD wanted sex for procreation; you'd 'abstain' for 3 weeks instead of ONE! So God doesnt really want us to procreate? Is that what youre saying? He just wants us to hump like animals cuz its fun? Geez - who knew?
It is a simple concept. I dont see why you fail to comprehend it unless its deliberate. Every sexual act must be open to new life.
110
posted on
06/12/2018 7:23:43 AM PDT
by
Shethink13
(there are 0 electoral votes in the state of denial)
To: metmom
Cause you all sure seem to treat it as if it's a virtue of some kind, just like sex is bad or something.
It MUST be; or else what LOGICAL (or biblical) reason would the Catholic Church INSIST that M&J NEVER had sexual relations?
111
posted on
06/12/2018 7:24:26 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Mark17
Forget the WIFE!
I now have an urge to write a limerick!!
112
posted on
06/12/2018 7:26:04 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Scrambler Bob
The abstinence method never intentionally impairs the fertility of a sexual act, as contraception does. And therein lies the problem with the drug-devices-surgery methods: the directly deliberate disabling of the "gift of self" which is marital union.
Ethically, any directly intended disabling of a bodily organ or system --- whether an eye, an ear, a leg, the reproductive system --- is morally objectionable.
When I say "directly intended," that means "not as a therapeutic measure." For instance, removal of a cancerous uterus. When I say "disabling," that means blocking normal function, whether temporarily or permanently.
It's particularly unethical with regards to the reproductive system, since (1) sex is sacred, meaning at least that you don't target parts of it to split off and reject, and (2) the cumulative results of a whole society accepting the premises (rejection of natural sex and fertility) is destroying a understanding of natural gender and sexual identity, destroying natural marriage as an institution, shrinking and weakening families, nations, and civilizations.
Note what contraception (as a mentality and as a technique) has "accomplished" in 50 years. It's the gateway of the "Culture of Death."
Think I'm kidding? Look around you.
113
posted on
06/12/2018 7:26:23 AM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
("Let us commend ourselves, and one another, and our whole life, unto Christ Our God.")
To: Elsie; Mrs. Don-o
And you KNOW this about Paul; HOW? Probably the same way you know that Mary did not remain a virgin.
114
posted on
06/12/2018 7:28:35 AM PDT
by
Shethink13
(there are 0 electoral votes in the state of denial)
To: jch10
"My free will allows me do as I choose concerning birth control." My body my choice! Right on!
PP/LGBT
115
posted on
06/12/2018 7:28:38 AM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
("Let us commend ourselves, and one another, and our whole life, unto Christ Our God.")
To: Mrs. Don-o
What do you mean by the little blue pill?
is it something to take when you’re ill??
When your head has an ache,
It’s an aspirin you take.
That’s the cure when you’re needing a thrill.
116
posted on
06/12/2018 7:30:38 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Mark17
I am sure I have a 10 foot pole around here, for not touching things with.I; for one; am NOT going to go for this bait that has just been tossed in front of me!
117
posted on
06/12/2018 7:34:29 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: metmom
Does no good; as I can’t read Hebrew.
I can; however; read the ENGLISH translation of Hebrew words on that web page.
Is that any better than English words found in various translations of whole bible sources?
118
posted on
06/12/2018 7:38:06 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: CodeToad
"I guess if two married people arent humping every second of every day to make more Catholic babies thats evil too." Code Toad, I like you and I usually find your comments are sensible, or at least plausible.
Really, I do.
However, that was so ... misinformed. But open-minded as you are, I am confident you are open to better information.
(1) Nobody has ever said, ever, that Catholic married couples have to have as many babies as they are physically able to have. Never.
(2) As for "birth control", a limited periodic abstinence (approx 1 week of every month), mutually agreed, is the only method which is
- effective,
- unoffensive to any religion,
- truly private,
- fully workable,
- free of charge,
- has no medical side effects,
- does not (like the hormonal products)get into your watershed and make male fish and amphibians develop eggs in their testicles,
- does not make you dependent on the pharmaceutical industry from menarche to menopause, and
- cannot be used coercively by the State.
The evidence of each of these claims has been published many times RIGHT HERE ON FREE REPUBLIC (LINK)
It's worth a click.
119
posted on
06/12/2018 7:47:48 AM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
(I'm ignorant, but I learn something new every day.)
To: CodeToad
120
posted on
06/12/2018 7:51:45 AM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
(I'm ignorant, but I learn something new every day.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 201-217 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson