Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hot California market daunts first-time buyers
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8008924 ^ | 5-31-05

Posted on 05/31/2005 10:33:33 AM PDT by TXBSAFH

Hot California market daunts first-time buyers Median home price passes $500,000; many young workers shut out

Paul Sakuma / AP file A home for sale in Los Altos, Calif. The pace of existing-home sales rose 3 percent last month from the year-earlier level. By Martin Wolk Chief economics correspondent MSNBC Updated: 12:51 a.m. ET May 28, 2005Pity the poor first-time home buyer in California. With the median price of a home in the Golden State crossing $500,000 for the first time, getting into that “starter” home requires perseverance, luck and a willingness to think small.

advertisement

Maya Vestal, 25, who works for a biotech company, took the plunge this month with her boyfriend, plunking down $585,000 for a 1,200-square-foot home near San Jose in a neighborhood she describes as “not great.”

Frankly, the three-bedroom, one-bath house doesn’t sound all that great either. Built in 1940, it needs about $50,000 worth of work including new plumbing, new wiring and a new kitchen, she figures. “The only thing we’re keeping are the floors, which are beautiful, original hardwood.”

Together, Vestal and her boyfriend, a 25-year-old city worker, earn more than $100,000 a year, but the new $3,800 monthly mortgage payments will eat up nearly 70 percent of the couple’s take-home pay.

“It’s a lot of money, and it’s really scary,” she said. “We really like to travel, and we probably won’t be able to do that so much.”

But with prices going up so rapidly and long-term interest rates lingering at their lowest levels in four decades, Vestal and her boyfriend didn’t want to risk waiting.

“We felt if prices or interest rates go up, we’ll be priced out of the market,” she said. “Even if rates went up half a percent we wouldn’t be able to afford a house.”

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Miscellaneous; US: California
KEYWORDS: realestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 261-263 next last
To: Anvilhead

Where I lived in Brooklyn, houses were around that price as of last year. Nevertheless 1. illegal aliens were stuffing eachother into the rentals and 2. Legal immigrants were stuffing two families into single family homes, kicking in $250,000 a piece to share a VERY SMALL row house.


81 posted on 05/31/2005 11:14:23 AM PDT by Clemenza (Vader 2008: In your heart, you know he's right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

"Not if the house appreciates 4k/month."

That is an unrealized gain. Means nothing until they sell. If they can't hold out until they sell, they are out of luck and a house. Try to hold it for a year then move out of state.

Prop 13 will not last forever. The socialist kooks and southern invaders of California would love a way to crash the housing market so the current residents leave and the new arrivals find cheap housing.


82 posted on 05/31/2005 11:15:04 AM PDT by xusafflyer (Mexifornian by birth, Hoosier by choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Re: The SUV bubble. Check out the prices for used Ford Expeditions on E-Bay. You can get a good used lo-milage Expedition for less than the cost of a Honda Civic in similar condition.


83 posted on 05/31/2005 11:15:59 AM PDT by gridlock (ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeAgenda
How does their decision not make sense?

"Past Performance Does Not Guarantee Future Results"

84 posted on 05/31/2005 11:16:47 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws spawned the federal health care monopoly and fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeAgenda
How does their decision not make sense?

--If the appreciation stops or slows down --If one of them loses their job --If their relationship hits the skids

All of which are all too probable, which is why I wouldn't do it.

LQ

85 posted on 05/31/2005 11:17:11 AM PDT by LizardQueen (The world is not out to get you, except in the sense that the world is out to get everyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
I paid $1.87 for regular on Friday.

Must be nice.

86 posted on 05/31/2005 11:18:21 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ctlpdad
A $3,800/mo mortgage? That's gotta be tough to swallow.

What they need is a better loan. $3,800/mo is $468,000 @ 8%. What did they do? Buy the house on a credit card?

Even first time buyers are able to get an adjustable at 4.125%. I just refinanced with a fixed payment for five years at 1.5%. Granted, that's a negative am. adjustable but since it keeps my cash flow way down and my house is appreciating at roughly $15,000 per month, I can well afford it.

87 posted on 05/31/2005 11:19:59 AM PDT by Grim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

I'm on the ground here in the bubble housing market.

A couple of things to note. To buy an average house where I live (south Orange County), costs about $690,000 for a 3br 1400 sq ft home, give or take. The type of people that are buying them now, are taking out interest only, negative amoritazaion loans. Basically, they are renting it from the bank.

There's a house for rent right now, for $2100 a month. There's also a house for sale across the street, for $669,000. They're exactly the same. Anyone that tells me that it's better to buy that house (which sold in 1998 for $236,000), than rent is crazy. Assuming 20% down, and 5.8% fixed, you're looking at double the cost to own. And that's after you plunk down $130,000. That's why most of the sheeple are getting interest only loans that eat up 60% or more of their take home pay.



Also, the reason, and only reason that home prices are as high as they are, are the incredibly lax lending standards, and ease in which those who need maximum credit, can obtain it.

The piper will have to be paid sometime. It is only a question of when, not if.


88 posted on 05/31/2005 11:20:46 AM PDT by rumrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
Not if the house appreciates 4k/month

That helps when you go to sell the place down the road, but isn't much help in the meantime!

89 posted on 05/31/2005 11:21:25 AM PDT by BigBobCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeAgenda
How does their decision not make sense?

They could have rented a very nice apartment in the area for $1,800/month and put $2,000/month in savings. In five years they might actually be married and ready to sign up for a mortgage, and would have $120,000 + interest in savings to use as a down payment on the same house (which I predict will then be selling for about $360,000.) Over the life of the loan, they will pay 350K to 400K to the lender instead of the 1.2M they are going to get stuck paying under their current arrangement.

Incurring a huge debt just to get a phony tax break is not smart.

90 posted on 05/31/2005 11:22:32 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Violence never settles anything." Genghis Khan, 1162-1227)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Right. At some point people are going to decide a place with fantastic economic opportunity, great weather 300+ days a year, the ability to get to the beach, mountains and/or desert within an hour, etc. are undesirable? I don't think so. We'll see!


91 posted on 05/31/2005 11:22:33 AM PDT by ConservativeAgenda (Don't rely upon others to stand up for what you believe is right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: oldleft

My anemic IRA is just sad compared to my home which has tripled to around 450K in 4 years. If you know of any equities that I can turn a 5K down payment and 1300 a month (maybe 60K total) into nearly a half a million dollars in four years, while living in them let me know.


92 posted on 05/31/2005 11:22:47 AM PDT by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Grim

It must be a piti payment - principle, itnerest, taxes & insurance.


93 posted on 05/31/2005 11:23:13 AM PDT by ctlpdad (Liberals - weeds in the lawn of society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: ctlpdad
A $3,800/mo mortgage? That's gotta be tough to swallow.

We just sold a house here in Orange County. During the process, we had an offer from a couple. The next day they withdrew the offer after the wife had a panic attack when she realized her mortgage/tax/insurance payment would be $4,500 per month.

94 posted on 05/31/2005 11:23:39 AM PDT by socal_parrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LizardQueen

That a good point except...if the folks who bought their CA homes for $200,000 ten years ago, who are selling them for $800,000 now, had thought that way a lot of them would not be retiring early!


95 posted on 05/31/2005 11:26:04 AM PDT by ConservativeAgenda (Don't rely upon others to stand up for what you believe is right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
This lady and her boyfriend could have gotten a brand new 5 bedroom 5 bath home here in Northeast Wisconsin.

Moved in April into a new home:

2700 sq.ft
4 bdrm + study
3 car attached garage
All Brick
140 x 70 lot
Nice features inside (silestone, whirlpool, gas fireplace, crown molding throughout, etc.)
25 minutes from work
less than an hour to wade fishing the surf

$201K.

I love Houston

96 posted on 05/31/2005 11:26:27 AM PDT by tx_eggman (Liberalism is only possible in that moment when a man chooses Barabas over Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot

Well at least she realized it before they moved in.


97 posted on 05/31/2005 11:26:32 AM PDT by ctlpdad (Liberals - weeds in the lawn of society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: ctlpdad
It must be a piti payment - principle, itnerest, taxes & insurance.

It is, but the loan is still at 8% which is way out of line.

98 posted on 05/31/2005 11:27:20 AM PDT by Grim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeAgenda
Right. At some point people are going to decide a place with fantastic economic opportunity, great weather 300+ days a year, the ability to get to the beach, mountains and/or desert within an hour, etc. are undesirable? I don't think so. We'll see!

Yep. Right after The Big One, or Vincente Fox makes "Los Angeles, Mexico" a reality.

99 posted on 05/31/2005 11:28:35 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws spawned the federal health care monopoly and fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: CheneyChick
Don't worry. Most Californians are not willing to give up the climate, the beach, the mountains, etc. It's all here.

My wife and I are willing to do just that! We just bought a shorefront place on Puget Sound and are bailing out of LA alltogether. Sold our investment property last week and our own house goes on the market this week. We just can't resist the idea of having our own beachfront place with zero mortgage payments... thanks to the gains from our stuff here in LA.

100 posted on 05/31/2005 11:29:02 AM PDT by BigBobCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 261-263 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson