Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge assails cases doubting Obama's citizenship
The Associated Press ^ | 3/5/2009 | NEDRA PICKLER

Posted on 03/05/2009 4:03:57 PM PST by AJ in NYC

A federal judge on Thursday threw out a lawsuit questioning President Barack Obama's citizenship, lambasting the case as a waste of the court's time and suggesting the plaintiff's attorney may have to compensate the president's lawyer. In an argument popular on the Internet and taken seriously practically nowhere else, Obama's critics argue he is ineligible to be president because he is not a "natural-born citizen" as the Constitution requires. In response last summer, Obama's campaign posted his Hawaiian birth certificate on its Web site. But the lawsuit argues it is a fake and that Obama was actually born in his father's homeland of Kenya, even though Hawaiian officials have said the document is authentic. "This case, if it were allowed to proceed, would deserve mention in one of those books that seek to prove that the law is foolish or that America has too many lawyers with not enough to do," U.S. District Judge James Robertson said in his written opinion. The lawsuit didn't even use Obama's legal name but called him "Barry Soetoro," the name he went by while attending elementary school in Indonesia. It's one of many that has been filed claiming Obama is ineligible to serve as president. Robertson ordered plaintiff's attorney John Hemenway of Colorado Springs, Colo., to show why he hasn't violated court rules barring frivolous and harassing cases and shouldn't have to pay Obama's attorney, Bob Bauer, for his time arguing that the case should be thrown out.

(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: asspress; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; mcarthyscomingforyou; picklercomsymp; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-189 next last
To: DJ MacWoW
Guess they were all under the bus.

Lol, I guess they still are, or in Kenya, Indonesia....

121 posted on 03/05/2009 7:01:42 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (FUBO, he says we should listen to our enemies, but not to Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Washington was born in Virginia in 1732. John Adams was born in Massachusetts in 1735 Jefferson was born in Virginia in 1743 Madison born in Virginia in 1751 Monroe born in Virginia in 1758.

So how exactly could those births have been deemed to take place in the United States, given that the polity going by that name did not even come into existence until 1776?

122 posted on 03/05/2009 7:10:28 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Can you imagine the speech John Adams would make at this time?

There has got to be a John Adams in every single one of us, if we are to prevail.

LOL. As much as I love the idea of John Galt, what North America needs is more John Adams'.

Sorry for the pontification. :-)

123 posted on 03/05/2009 7:12:04 PM PST by fanfan (God, Bless America, please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Thank you Lucy.


124 posted on 03/05/2009 7:13:08 PM PST by fanfan (God, Bless America, please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

Because they were not foreign born. They had loyalty to this soil and not England. Their loyalty was not divided. You should stick to economics.


125 posted on 03/05/2009 7:13:43 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

You’re forgiven. And agreed with!


126 posted on 03/05/2009 7:16:27 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

Sadly, I don’t believe there is anyone now that compares with the Founding Fathers. They were men of vision and honor. Smart too. lol


127 posted on 03/05/2009 7:19:06 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
I have to agree with #87. I don't think the presence of the "grandfather clause" in itself provides a clear definition of "natural born".

I don't think the article you posted from Townhall is a quality legal argument and it's not even very well written. It would be nice to see a better review of the meaning of "natural born" from someone who knows how to do Supreme Court level legal and historical research.

I'm open to the possibility that Obama is ineligible. But I don't think that your argument or that of the article would be sufficient to prove this in court.

You may have heard that Chester A. Arthur's father was not only born in Ireland, but was not even a citizen when Arthur became president. Maybe Arthur should not have been president, but for some reason questions about this always revolved around his possible birth in Canada rather that his father's citizenship - until this year.

128 posted on 03/05/2009 7:32:05 PM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Being-And-Time

Gee thanks for signing up today to educate us!

Welcome to FR.


129 posted on 03/05/2009 7:32:15 PM PST by antceecee (Bless us Father.. have mercy on us and protect us from evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
Does it matter where Bobby Jindal was born, both his mother and father were Indian citizens. trumandogz
Jindal is a Natural Born Citizen, he was born in the USA. kansas58.

No it doesn't matter where Jindal was born he is NOT NATURAL BORN because neither of his parents were US citizens, and as mush as I like him he cannot be President.
What if Vladimir Putin and his wife came to the US and while visiting Ms. Putin had a baby,
by this logiic that child would be "natural born" and could be POTUS.

PREPOSTEROUS LOGIC

130 posted on 03/05/2009 7:36:17 PM PST by JGA2Z (give me Liberty or give me death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AJ in NYC; LucyT; Iowan; Fred Nerks; Calpernia
James Robertson (born 1938) is a judge for the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. James Robertson was appointed a United States District Judge by President Bill Clinton in 1994/

THAT says all you need to know.

Ladies and Gentlemen. The seat belt sign has come on in the cabin. We're experiencing a little turbulence...

131 posted on 03/05/2009 7:39:34 PM PST by Polarik ("A forgery created to prove a claim repudiates that claim")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLaertius

Yep. Another Clinton Klingon.


132 posted on 03/05/2009 7:39:57 PM PST by Polarik ("A forgery created to prove a claim repudiates that claim")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
They were men of vision and honor.

And if I may, IMHO, were God given :)

133 posted on 03/05/2009 7:41:31 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (FUBO, he says we should listen to our enemies, but not to Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

I think it is very clear. Every President was born on this soil. In the beginning, their parents were not. The Founders did not want a President with divided loyalties. They had proved themselves and suffered to form a united nation. Later Presidents wouldn’t have that kind of proof.


134 posted on 03/05/2009 7:43:07 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer; LucyT
“even though Hawaiian officials have said the document is authentic.”

When did this take place? News to me.

The document is authentic. Obama is not.

On Oct 31, Hawaii's DOH Director anounced to the world that they had "Obama's original birth certificate ON RECORD"

"Hello, Dr. Onaka? Was Obama really born in Hawaii?"

*CLICK*

It was just another nonstatement by the O-bureaucratics.

135 posted on 03/05/2009 7:44:39 PM PST by Polarik ("A forgery created to prove a claim repudiates that claim")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

I believe that. They were men that created a nation both blessed by God.


136 posted on 03/05/2009 7:45:10 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
Today, children, we're going to learn a new concept. It's called "pro-bono." Can you say pro-bono?

There ain't a chance in hell that Bob Bauer or Joe Sandler (another Obama attorney representing him in BC matters) are working pro bono. Cut the condescension and get a clue.

137 posted on 03/05/2009 7:47:00 PM PST by Shady Ray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: traditional1; LucyT
However, the COLB is what they call the "birth certificate" to fool the dupes who support The Messiah.

And a fake one, too!!

138 posted on 03/05/2009 7:47:06 PM PST by Polarik ("A forgery created to prove a claim repudiates that claim")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Of course; anyone who thinks this is a waste of time that could be spent on more productive ventures is obviously just a liberal, Obama-loving troll, right?

Do you see how you’ve become a carbon-copy of a 9/11-truther? You think anyone who thinks your actions are fruitless and the evidence far too weak to make it in court is just part of the enemy, part of the conspiracy. “They don’t believe in the conspiracy; they’re obviously working for Them!”

If you read my post, you would see that I advocate taking productive action. You’re not going to shove this through court, period. So we should start initiatives to get legislators to pass laws requiring any potential candidate to produce their BC. If we get a federal law passed, there’s a .0001% chance that we can retroactively force Barry to produce his BC, and then we can know the truth.

And a troll, by definition, is a poster who is solely posting for the purpose of being polemical, with no interest in engaging in a reasoned exchange with other posters. I’m not doing that; I’m just engaging in this debate and expressing an opinion that I think is productive in regards to the discourse occurring in this forum. Keep in mind that you’re the one who is not posting anything substantive. “Being-And-Time is teh Troll n00b” does not add anything to this debate—in fact, it resembles trolling much more than my comments, unfortunately.


139 posted on 03/05/2009 7:53:26 PM PST by Being-And-Time
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: antceecee

I would address your sarcasm but any and all posts I submit in my defense do not make it to this thread for whatever reason.

So I’ll just say thank you for the welcome, even if you meant it to be venomous, and hope this reply is at least approved.


140 posted on 03/05/2009 7:53:28 PM PST by Being-And-Time
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-189 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson