He is demonstratively and admittedly NOT a Natural Born Citizen.
PING
Judge Carter is sure taking his sweet time rendering a desicion as to allow this case before him to move forward or dismiss it. I do hope this is a good sign that he will allow it to go to trial.
It’s good that you have figured this out, all on your own, too.
But, better late than never.
Honestly, Welcome.
There’s two choices here. Either he settles it by disclosing all documents, including education records or the people will settle it for him.
... according to the conceptions of a Frenchman who wrote about it 251 years ago.
Sorry, but you can't really consider that to be a legal description.
Ping
“This is what Obama is trying to duck”
Please answer this,
Why do the faction of birthers who challenge Obama on being a natural born citizen care about the birth certificate when no one denies Obama’s father was not an American citizen?
I hope you start some small fires of doubt with whomever reads or hears you. This issue could not be more important.
My hope is that the more of us will, via work like you and others are doing, return to the philosophical source of our Republic...and then be outraged enough to halt this latest assault.
Long-lost article by Obama's dad surfaces
******************************EXCERPT*************************
Parts of the article, titled “Problems Facing Our Socialism,” have been making the rounds on several small blogs over the past week, but Politico.com is now, for the first time, reproducing the entire piece in its original form.
FYI, go to the Dept State website and see what it says about dual citizens having allegiance to two countries.
Only if you accept the definition which you have offered here which is not encapsulated in US Law anywhere. Few people would agree with it, especially at this point in the election cycle.
If that’s the best we got I say we drop it and move on to something else.
It would make sense to get our Congress people to define NB in the law, and provide for the FEC or state Sec. of State’s to verify eligibility.
You are not going to get any court to make up case law based around an obscure 18th century legal dictionary that has the effect of removing an elected President.
Maybe you need a new hobby?
An 18th century French take on the subject of Natural Born is certainly interesting, but there is nothing that FORCES anyone to make it our 21st century rule.
The bottom line, in my mind, is that someone is going to have to irrefutably prove Obama is NOT a natural born US citizen, per current understanding of that term, before anyone takes this beyond the level of merely a curious conversation item.
If Bambi and his backers can drag this out long enough there will be another opening on the SCOTUS. At that time he will entrench another left wing judge, have a 5 to 4 majority, and just thumb his nose at any legal requirements for anything. That is the goal. That is reason. Constitution be damned.
“FREE THE LONG FORM!”
Bumperoo!
Are you Dianna Cotter ?
Great article Danae.
Pray for America and Our Troops
Thank you for defending our constitution.
Some may also find the following article of interest(see link)
The Article employs a well known process of logic, called deductive reasoning, to highlight what a Natural Born Citizen IS, by eliminating what a Natural Born Citizen IS NOT.
Defining Natural-Born Citizen
http://federalistblog.us/2008/11/natural-born_citizen_defined.html
Thank you again for your vigilance!
STE=Q