Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Team of Researchers Blames Children's Films for Perpetuating "Heteronormativity"
LifeSiteNews ^ | 6/24/09 | Kathleen Gilbert

Posted on 06/24/2009 1:48:56 PM PDT by wagglebee

ANN ARBOR, Michigan, June 24, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Researchers at the University of Michigan have concluded that the love stories told in classic Disney and other G-rated children's films – such as the Little Mermaid - are partially to blame for the pervasiveness of what they label "heteronormativity." 

"Despite the assumption that children’s media are free of sexual content, our analyses suggest that these media depict a rich and pervasive heterosexual landscape," wrote researchers Emily Kazyak and Karin Martin, in a report published in the latest issue of the Sociologists for Women in Society (SWS) publication Gender & Society. 

Kazyak and Martin said they studied the role of heterosexual relationships in several of the highest-grossing G-rated films between 1990-2005. 

The results, say the researchers, illustrate two ways that the children's films "construct heterosexuality": through "depictions of hetero-romantic love as exceptional, powerful, transformative, and magical," and "depictions of interactions between gendered bodies in which the sexiness of feminine characters is subjected to the gaze of masculine characters."

"Characters in love are surrounded by music, flowers, candles, magic, fire, balloons, fancy dresses, dim lights, dancing and elaborate dinners," the researchers observed. "Fireflies, butterflies, sunsets, wind and the beauty and power of nature often provide the setting for - and a link to the naturalness of - hetero-romantic love."

The SWS press release on the research blamed what they called the "old ideals" of romantic relationships, specifically those found the Brothers Grimm fairy tales, which in many instances inspired the films' storylines, for "such heavily gendered depictions and glorified portrayals of heterosexual relationships."

The team says the results point to heterosexuality achieving a "taken-for-granted status" "because hetero-romance is depicted as powerful." 

"Both ordinary and exceptional constructions of heterosexuality work to normalize its status because it becomes difficult to imagine anything other than this form of social relationship or anyone outside of these bonds," they concluded.

"These films provide powerful portraits of a multifaceted and pervasive heterosexuality that likely facilitates the reproduction of heteronormativity."

The SWS press release concluded: "President Obama may have declared June to be Gay Pride Month, but entertainment for children therefore continues to perpetuate a less inclusive message, leaving those outside its confines with little to build their own dreams of happily ever after."

Sexuality expert Dr. Judith Reisman told LifeSiteNews.com (LSN) yesterday that the "politically correct" study reveals "the growing dominance of Heterophobia within academia and the spread of heterophobes among female professionals."

"Now, if the Ladies of the Sociology Society think pornography is becoming the heteronorm and that Disney is contributing to that form of what is really Heterophobia, they might have an argument," Reisman noted. 

"However, the Ladies of the Sociology Society appear to favor Homoerotic child propaganda, as the current academic party line dictates."



TOPICS: Society; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: childrensmovies; heterophobia; homosexualagenda; moralabsolutes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last
To: wagglebee

No doubt about it...The end goal is decriminalization of child sex.


61 posted on 06/24/2009 2:54:25 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (TAZ:Untamed, Unpredictable, Uninhibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
hetero-romantic love as exceptional, powerful, transformative, and magical,

Been there, done that, it's all of those. Yee-Haw!

62 posted on 06/24/2009 2:58:23 PM PDT by JoeFromSidney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Actually, every culture in this world depicts heterosexuality as normal, even those cultures where homosexuality is more accepted.


63 posted on 06/24/2009 3:00:10 PM PDT by keats5 (Not all of us are hypnotized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

What a load of horse puckey!!

Liberals and their pro-gay agenda are pushing the whole homosexual thing way too hard. Perhaps we conservatives need to start pushing back!!!

Let me see if I can guess - the “Team of Researchers” were dumbed down, mindless liberal protege of our wonderful liberal (lack of) education system??


64 posted on 06/24/2009 3:09:17 PM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"The team says the results point to heterosexuality achieving a "taken-for-granted status" "because hetero-romance is depicted as powerful.""

This is wrong because . . . ?

The plumbing alone is sufficient for it to be "taken for granted."

65 posted on 06/24/2009 3:13:13 PM PDT by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I hate this friggin' upside-down liberal universe!


66 posted on 06/24/2009 3:17:37 PM PDT by Costumed Vigilante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soothesayer

i can’t even begin to imagine the outrage that would cause. Then again, the American people are pretty cowed by the Gay Mafia.


67 posted on 06/24/2009 3:18:21 PM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
You & that commonsense of yours...I'm tellin’ ya....:)
68 posted on 06/24/2009 5:14:35 PM PDT by constitutiongirl ("Duty is ours. Consequences are God's."- General Thomas 'Stonewall' Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: constitutiongirl
LOL!!

God doesn't faze them. It doesn't matter to them that His design was perfect. So you have to point out that they contribute nothing to the evolution of their "species".

69 posted on 06/24/2009 5:25:23 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

I’m constantly amazed at people who insist on tilting reality on its head and then complaining when it doesn’t work out the way they expected.


That is a FANTASTIC quote.


70 posted on 06/24/2009 6:26:43 PM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

Comment #71 Removed by Moderator

Comment #72 Removed by Moderator

To: wagglebee
From the article:

_____________________________________________________

The SWS press release on the research blamed what they called the "old ideals" of romantic relationships, specifically those found the Brothers Grimm fairy tales, which in many instances inspired the films' storylines, for "such heavily gendered depictions and glorified portrayals of heterosexual relationships."

The team says the results point to heterosexuality achieving a "taken-for-granted status" "because hetero-romance is depicted as powerful."

_____________________________________________________

Next thing you know they'll be protesting the bakeries that insist on having boy+girl figurines exclusively on top of their wedding cakes.

(A bakery near me, very much an old neighborhood institution, now has "both kinds." A jewelry store several miles away has only boy+girl wedding figurines in its window. The jeweler is brave.)

73 posted on 06/24/2009 7:57:52 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
normalcy, is self perpetuating...
74 posted on 06/24/2009 8:21:19 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - Obama is basically Jim Jones with a teleprompter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
And these dimwhacks are anti-normative.

Normalists: another group that should be added to the hate crimes protection list.

75 posted on 06/24/2009 10:40:32 PM PDT by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (We're living in the Dark Ages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

By their own figures, Promoting 90% of the population’s lifestyle of Heterosexuality is Wrong?????

What the hell kind of world do these whack jobs live in?

Straight people are the MAJORITY!!! I am not saying that gay people should be burned at the stake, but 90% is 90% and that is bigger than 10% by almost a factor of 10!!!!

Teaching kids not to be mean to someone because they are gay is one thing, but teaching them a minority lifestyle is quite a different matter.


76 posted on 06/24/2009 10:51:57 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
By their own figures, Promoting 90% of the population’s lifestyle of Heterosexuality is Wrong?????

What the hell kind of world do these whack jobs live in?

Straight people are the MAJORITY!!! I am not saying that gay people should be burned at the stake, but 90% is 90% and that is bigger than 10% by almost a factor of 10!!!!

The irony is that homosexuals don't even make up 10% of the population; at best they are 5% of the population, but probably only 2-3%.

77 posted on 06/25/2009 5:54:23 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED

I dont believe that is the end goal, but that is certainly what the end result will be.

The problem with most liberals is that they never think through the consequences of their short-term feel-good policies.


78 posted on 06/26/2009 2:26:23 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; All

I mistakenly duplicated the posting of this article.

For those interested in the comments on the other thread,

they are here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2279970/posts


79 posted on 06/26/2009 4:18:09 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

It’s really not that big a deal, we’ve all done it before.


80 posted on 06/26/2009 4:20:33 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson