Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where's the birth certificate (large billboard on Interstate 5 in Los Angeles)
Me ^ | July 19, 2009 | Me

Posted on 07/19/2009 10:08:15 PM PDT by SideoutFred

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-145 next last
To: blackie

He just disappeared.


81 posted on 07/20/2009 9:12:06 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Does Zer0 have any friends, who are not criminals, foreign/domestic terrorists, or tax cheats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

How are things in the Napa Valley?


82 posted on 07/20/2009 9:58:14 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; BP2; ...
As a side note though, WND has published some claims that are so erroneous as to damage their credibility. For example..."

Check out #80.

Thanks BuckeyeTexan.

83 posted on 07/20/2009 10:20:33 AM PDT by LucyT (If it isn't on Free Republic, it didn't happen. -- Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Just now, Rush Limbaugh was describing his going through another tax audit- he then gave Obama a good rip and stated that Obama hasn’t even proven citizenship....


84 posted on 07/20/2009 10:24:06 AM PDT by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: PA Engineer

ping me when you are ready to sell them


85 posted on 07/20/2009 10:29:07 AM PDT by naturalborn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Banned U.S. travel to Pakistan in 1981- yes or no?? Actually, it’s well documented either way. Thus, if WND had it wrong, it wouldn’t exactly be erroneous.

Are you subscribed to DU?


86 posted on 07/20/2009 10:29:47 AM PDT by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred

Bookmark


87 posted on 07/20/2009 10:35:59 AM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real_patriotic_american

What’s well-documented? Travel to Pakistan was not banned by the U.S. State Department. Yes, WND was wrong and erroneous.

No, I’m not subscribed to DU. What’s with your hostility toward me? Are you pissed because I take issue with Taitz? What exactly is your problem with me?


88 posted on 07/20/2009 10:37:59 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Character, Leadership, and Loyalty matter - Be an example, no matter the cost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

I absolutely have no problem with you. I’m casually mentioning my opinion.


89 posted on 07/20/2009 10:46:18 AM PDT by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
I’m ecstatic that Lou Dobbs is asking questions. Now we’re getting somewhere. And credit where credit is due - he’s asking because of Orly Taitz’s lawsuit. Good job, Taitz! (That’s difficult for me to say because I have some issues with Taitz.

Ya know what I would do, I would go read her website and copy information to save so I could refer to it later. She had good information and all because she was open to people emailing her. Phoning them if they asked. She wanted all information and then she asked for help on some others. One time I was there someone had posted a bunch of crap on her somewhere and then someone reposted on her website. She said please email me so we can talk. What person in Obama's admin would do that? NONE. They know they are lying.

Then the big fallout which I never understood where the girl said orly was a fake. I felt so bad for her. It was right after Orly came face to face with one of the SCOTUS who said they would read her case. How could that be fake? The name calling was horrible. Orly left the website and opened her third I believe it was on her own. I did not want to get involved in what was going on but it appeared it was a big hoax to get rid of Orly because she had some information.

I began to realize that this is Obama's way and if we are to fight his agenda we must take people for their word and confront them if we disagree. If we just watch, obama will win.

90 posted on 07/20/2009 10:51:32 AM PDT by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: real_patriotic_american

Asking me if I’m subscribed to DU is a passive-aggressive method to imply that I’m a troll. I’ll take you at your word. If you don’t have a problem with me, then please don’t use such tatics anymore.


91 posted on 07/20/2009 10:53:15 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Character, Leadership, and Loyalty matter - Be an example, no matter the cost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: naturalborn

I contacted the vendor and will let you know the response.


92 posted on 07/20/2009 10:55:18 AM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the occupation media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Good analysis, Buckeye. I tend to be a skeptic, and believe if something seems too good to be true, it probably is. Since our “president” has so much money, power and influence behind him, I just get the funny feeling that those who are questioning his legitimacy are being played by those people. It’s almost too good to be true that anyone in the MSM would begin to report on this.

Even with the Major Cook story. His revoked orders seemed a bit too convenient. They could have handled it differently, like lawsuits in the past, by having the judge just throw out the case for standing or some other such nonsense. But, they revoked his orders. They had to know that would be news, even for the MSM.

And, did anyone note the thread (Should Obama control the Internet), a desire for the government to punish those who write ‘falsehoods’ on the Internet, spreading rumors, etc? Is it possible that the ‘birther’ movement is being set up? Someone else mentioned that the reason Rush, Hannity and Levin aren’t talking about it is because they are being baited into it (to use as ammunition to silence talk radio), and they aren’t taking the bait.

What happens to everyone who has ever questioned Obama’s legitimacy if he finally reveals his true, long-form birth certificate (forged or not) showing he was born in Hawaii. Can he round all of us up and send us to the Gulags for spreading ‘falsehoods’? Has he had enough time to put the pieces in place to accomplish this?

Like I said...I’m a skeptic by nature, but we live in crazy times and anything is possible in the bizarro world.


93 posted on 07/20/2009 10:55:48 AM PDT by erkyl (We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office --Aesop (~550 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred

this subject is starting to raise eyebrows in the military


94 posted on 07/20/2009 10:57:12 AM PDT by sfvgto (Dear Congress, my name is Jimmie....gimmie, gimmie, gimmie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Hey polarik, you have a contingency plan in case suddenly we have a release or rather a timely event of supposedly Obamas real birth certificate that comes out on the web?

Has anyone tracked down where obama's legal defense told the court that the BC had some embarassing details to obama and the DNC on it? I read that but was not able to track the quote anywhere.

If so, what if at this point Obama no longer cares about embarassment and will reveal whatever in full knowledge whatever is on there he has 60 votes to keep him in office?

Okay so he comitted fraud. He will do a EO that fraud is a good thing for America. No joking either. Much!

95 posted on 07/20/2009 10:57:30 AM PDT by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911
I don’t usually post to “myself,” that should have read “all”.

I post to myself all the time. I like my answers.

96 posted on 07/20/2009 10:58:22 AM PDT by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: OafOfOffice
I've emailed Orly Taitz more than once about the Pakistan issue and have not received a response. Same for WND. I'm in the process of obtaining a copy of the original U.S. State Department travel advisory to send to both. (You can see the text of the advisory and its offical government index number on this thread.)

I certainly don't think Taitz is a fake or pursuing these cases for publicity. I think she genuinely wants to see Obama exposed and I admire her tenacity. I take exception to some of her methods.

97 posted on 07/20/2009 11:00:55 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Character, Leadership, and Loyalty matter - Be an example, no matter the cost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: erkyl
And, did anyone note the thread (Should Obama control the Internet), a desire for the government to punish those who write ‘falsehoods’ on the Internet, spreading rumors, etc? Is it possible that the ‘birther’ movement is being set up? Someone else mentioned that the reason Rush, Hannity and Levin aren’t talking about it is because they are being baited into it (to use as ammunition to silence talk radio), and they aren’t taking the bait.

I tend to be a skeptic too. So much so that fellow birthers have raised questions about my sincerity on this issue. And then again, some have accused me of not being skeptical enough. So there you have it - no way to win.

I had not made that connection or even considered it. Thanks for raising the issue. That is very unsettling. Rush is starting to make snarky comments on the air about Obama's BC. I'll be interested to see if he takes it further.

98 posted on 07/20/2009 11:08:32 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Character, Leadership, and Loyalty matter - Be an example, no matter the cost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan; Polarik

“Perfect forgery”? Don’t think there’s any such thing. Someone capable of doing that would be counterfeiting large bills, don’t you think?


99 posted on 07/20/2009 1:31:05 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Orly insists the Pakistan travel is a big issue? I do not keep up with everything on her website. I have personally asked that question to deniers online and they cannot point to a link that says travel was allowed. They usually say, my great, great uncle, or simlar, travelled there all the time.

Then I hear that if you were not considered one of them travel there would not be advised and you were not welcome.

Doesn’t matter to me. Obama’s passport to travel anywhere during that era is important to me. If he freely went anywhere he wanted on a foreign passport then we should know. His allegiance is in question so who he citizenship with is important.

We had many go to Cuba without any reprisals also.


100 posted on 07/20/2009 1:52:52 PM PDT by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson