Posted on 08/10/2012 3:40:45 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
One of the complex sites contains a distinct, four-sided, truncated, pyramidal shape that is approximately 140 feet in width. This site contains three smaller mounds in a very clear formation, similar to the diagonal alignment of the Giza Plateau pyramids.
The second possible site contains four mounds with a larger, triangular-shaped plateau. The two larger mounds at this site are approximately 250 feet in width, with two smaller mounds approximately 100 feet in width. This site complex is arranged in a very clear formation with the large plateau, or butte, nearby in a triangular shape with a width of approximately 600 feet.
The sites have been documented and discovered by satellite archaeology researcher Angela Micol of Maiden, North Carolina. Angela has been conducting satellite archaeology research for over ten years, searching for ancient sites from space using Google Earth. Angela is a UNC Charlotte alumnus and has studied archaeology since childhood. Google Earth has allowed her to document many possible archaeological sites, including a potential underwater city off the coast of the Yucatan peninsula that has sparked the interest of scientists, researchers and archaeologists. Angela is also a board member of the APEX Institute, founded by archaeologist William Donato, who is pioneering underwater archaeological research in the Bahamas. Angela has been assisted by Don J. Long, fellow APEX researcher and colleague.
The sites have been verified as undiscovered by Egyptologist and pyramid expert Nabil Selim. Nabil's discoveries include the pyramid called Sinki at Abydos and the Dry Moat surrounding the Step pyramid Complex at Saqqara. Nabil has stated the smaller 100 foot "mounds", at one of the proposed complex sites, are a similar size as the 13th Dynasty Egyptian pyramids, if a square base can be discovered.
(Excerpt) Read more at archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot.com.au ...
Ha Ha Ha!
Yeah, from geologists. Who have never ever made any mistakes. Do I need to point out the one here who did ?
“Yeah, from geologists.”
Well,,,,,”Yeah, from geologists.” I don’t know,,, just pointing out the disagreements.
Well, if these do turn out to be ancient artificial structures, the geologists have made a whole bunch of mistakes. Just pointing out that possibility myself.
If these were on Mars, Richard C. Hoagland would be thrilled!
“Just pointing out that possibility myself.”
We are in agreement.
Heh, that’ll give people something to wonder about in a couple of thousand years. :’)
:’)
Thanks Jack Hammer, I’m not buying it at this point, but hadn’t heard about it, and it will make a good GGG ping. :’)
LOL!
;’)
checking original article, the first one is by a geologist who says it is a laccolith.
Well, there’s no lack o’ ‘liths in that part of the world. :’)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.