Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IBM engineers carbon nanotube transistors to replace silicon in computing
venturebeat.com ^ | October 1, 2015 11:00 AM | Dean Takahashi

Posted on 10/02/2015 10:07:16 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

IBM's carbon nanotubes have tiny circuits that are fractions of a meter apart.

Above: IBM's carbon nanotubes have tiny circuits that are fractions of a meter apart.

Image Credit: IBM

Carbon nanotubes are the leading candidate to replace silicon in semiconductor chips after the decades-long run of silicon electronics runs out. And IBM is hoping to usher along that transition with a new breakthrough being announced today.

In the October 2 issue of the journal Science, IBM researchers say they have overcome one of the most daunting challenges around carbon nanotube transistors, which are the building blocks of electronic circuits with dimensions that are measured in billionths of a meter. Carbon nanotubes may be the best way to uphold Moore’s Law, or the doubling of the number of transistors every couple of years. Moore’s Law is the metronome of the modern age, and it enables constant progress in the $335 billion chip industry.

Carbon nanotube chips could greatly improve the capabilities of high-performance computers, enabling Big Data to be analyzed faster, increasing the power and battery life of mobile devices and the Internet of Things, and allowing cloud data centers to deliver services more efficiently and economically, IBM said.

A carbon nanotube that is 10,000 times smaller than a strand of hair.

Above: A carbon nanotube that is 10,000 times smaller than a strand of hair.

Image Credit: IBM

After decades of progress, the speeds of microprocessors stalled around the early 2000s at 3GHz to 5GHz, mainly because silicon is reaching its physical limits. Carbon nanotubes, by contrast, can operate as transistors (or tiny electrical switches) at dimensions smaller than 10 nanometers, or 10,000 times thinner than a strand of human hair. That’s well below the size of today’s leading silicon technology (14 nanometers).

But those nanotubes are like spaghetti, and they have to be marshaled and controlled precisely to function as electronic circuitry. The contact points for the nanotubes create a lot of electrical resistance, which hinders overall performance. IBM has developed a novel way, at the atomic level, to weld — or bond — the metal molybdenum to the ends of carbon nanotubes to create a completely new contact structure.

Using this approach, the researchers in Yorktown Heights, N.Y., demonstrated the smallest contacts for carbon nanotubes at 9 nanometers, where the performance did not suffer despite the tiny dimensions. IBM’s carbon nanotube results satisfy the contact requirement all the way up to the 1.8-nanometer node (four technology generations of manufacturing technology away), showing that the technology can scale sooner than the industry thinks, IBM said.

Earlier this summer, IBM unveiled the first 7-nanometer node silicon test chip, pushing the limits of silicon technologies. By investing further in carbon nanotubes to replace traditional silicon, IBM wants to pave the way for a post-silicon future and make good come from its $3 billion investment in research and development.

A cross section of a chip with IBM's carbon nanotubes.

Above: A cross-section of a chip with IBM’s carbon nanotubes.

Image Credit: IBM

“These chip innovations are necessary to meet the emerging demands of cloud computing, Internet of Things and Big Data systems,” said Dario Gil, vice president of science and technology at IBM Research, in a statement. “As technology nears the physical limits of silicon, new materials and circuit architectures must be ready to deliver the advanced technologies that will drive the Cognitive Computing era. This breakthrough shows that computer chips made of carbon nanotubes will be able to power systems of the future sooner than the industry expected.”

Carbon nanotubes represent a new class of semiconductor materials that consist of single atomic sheets of carbon rolled up into a tube. The carbon nanotubes form the core of a transistor device whose superior electrical properties promise several generations of technology scaling beyond the physical limits of silicon.

Electrons in carbon transistors can move more easily than in silicon-based devices, and the ultra-thin body of carbon nanotubes provide additional advantages at the atomic scale. Inside a chip, contacts are the valves that control the flow of electrons from metal into the channels of a semiconductor. As transistors shrink in size, electrical resistance increases within the contacts, which impedes performance. Until now, decreasing the size of the contacts on a device caused a commensurate drop in performance — a challenge facing both silicon and carbon nanotube transistor technologies, IBM said.

IBM researchers had to forego traditional contact schemes and invented a metallurgical process akin to microscopic welding that chemically binds the metal atoms to the carbon atoms at the ends of nanotubes. This “end-bonded contact scheme” allows the contacts to be shrunk to below 10 nanometers without the performance of the carbon nanotube devices deteriorating.

“For any advanced transistor technology, the increase in contact resistance due to the decrease in the size of transistors becomes a major performance bottleneck,” said Shu-Jen Han, manager of the nanoscale science and technology group at IBM Research, in a statement. “Our novel approach is to make the contact from the end of the carbon nanotube, which we show does not degrade device performance. This brings us a step closer to the goal of a carbon nanotube technology within the decade.”

IBM carbon nanotubes

Above: IBM carbon nanotubes

Image Credit: IBM



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet; Science
KEYWORDS: carbonnanotubes; cognitivecomputing; computing; galliumarsenide; graphene; ibm; lowpowertransistors; nanotubes; neurosynaptic; notnew; quantum; siliconphotonics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 10/02/2015 10:07:16 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; BenLurkin
Related thread:

IBM's $3bn bet on next-gen computers: Carbon nanotubes, neuro chips

2 posted on 10/02/2015 10:10:55 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

bttt


3 posted on 10/02/2015 10:11:30 AM PDT by Covenantor ("Men are ruled-...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Will it be EMP resistant?


4 posted on 10/02/2015 10:12:44 AM PDT by the_daug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Don’t ask how I know but IBM is probably 10 years behind Intel.
I’m also pretty sure nanotubes are not compatible with FinFet technology.
IBM is great at coming up with new ideas.
They are very bad at execution and bringing them to production.

The problem seems to be similar to old Sun Microsystems.
It is run by big iron Server group and the Semiconductor side isn’t valued...until the circuits don’t work as expected.


5 posted on 10/02/2015 10:15:02 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

BFL


6 posted on 10/02/2015 10:17:00 AM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (It's a shame enobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Carbon based chips “should” be more compatible with internal applications such as the upcoming iBrain Cyber Brain.


7 posted on 10/02/2015 10:19:48 AM PDT by GraceG (Protect the Border from Illegal Aliens, Don't Protect Illegal Alien Boarders...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
A carbon nanotube that is 10,000 times smaller than a strand of hair.

10,000 times smaller? Means what, exactly? And was that an RCH, a BCH, or what?

Right in there with 400% less. Must be common core gibberish.

Why not just use the fraction?

8 posted on 10/02/2015 10:22:18 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
Journalists don't understand fractions....
9 posted on 10/02/2015 10:39:32 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

For a context of how microelectronics have shrunk over the years:

Originally, transistors were somewhere around 7mm wide.
One of the historical great CPUs was the Motorola 68000, which crammed 68,000 transistors into the same 7mm square.
Now we can build a M68000 small enough to fit into the space of one of _those_ transistors - ramming 68,000 M68000 CPUs into the same 7mm square.


10 posted on 10/02/2015 10:40:04 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (The world map will be quite different come 20 January 2017.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2; TigersEye; NormsRevenge; SierraWasp; Fred Nerks; Marine_Uncle

Truly mind boogling!


11 posted on 10/02/2015 10:44:37 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Al gore’s latest invention?

Built out of carbon?

Strange microscopic times!


12 posted on 10/02/2015 10:58:03 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (SEMPER FI!! - Monthly Donors Rock!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

fyi


13 posted on 10/02/2015 11:03:26 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

fyi


14 posted on 10/02/2015 11:05:19 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NoCmpromiz; Darksheare; tet68

fyi


15 posted on 10/02/2015 11:10:26 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

Won’t this extreme miniaturization necessarily imbue these microscopic circuits with a certain fragility so that they will be susceptible to being fried by ever-smaller EM pulses? Perhaps the chip physical construction provides shielding....


16 posted on 10/02/2015 11:20:54 AM PDT by citizen (America is-or wa5s-The Great Melting Pot. JEB won't even speak American in his own home. NO Bush!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: citizen
Current circuits in mobile devices , autos and most aircraft are not shielded against EM pulses.

Lead will shield ....but it is heavy!

17 posted on 10/02/2015 11:35:47 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Would be interesting to see what they can make out of it.


18 posted on 10/02/2015 1:16:20 PM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Sheldons idea was to use carbon nanotubes for a shelf for a rocket to the space station. Nice that someone took that idea and made transistors.


19 posted on 10/02/2015 2:07:31 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Carry_Okie; NormsRevenge; anyone; everyone; All
Be not deceived! Gore is not mocked!! Your transisters will be transgendered into transmorgronifiedmutantnanodisgronificators subject to the caps of cap-and-trade due to additional-absurdum carbone feet printses, dontcha know???

It's a deception that would make the Devil proud!!! (don't be too conspicuous of a consumer of these items lest they come and remove alla the lead from yer #2 pensil ta make more) Bwa Ha Ha Ha!!!

20 posted on 10/02/2015 4:05:51 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Hey, lets leap to support someone rich and strong enough who will DO SOMETHING, (even if its wrong))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson