Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

125-million-year-old mammal fossil reveals the early evolution of hair and spines
phys.org ^ | October 14, 2015 | Provided by: University of Chicago Medical Center

Posted on 10/20/2015 10:47:15 AM PDT by Red Badger

Skeleton of the Cretaceous mammal Spinolestes with preserved fur shadows. The outer ear can be seen at the upper edge of the photo (arrow). During preparation, the skeleton was transferred to a plastic matrix. Credit: Georg Oleschinski. With permission of Nature Publishing Group

======================================================================================================================

The discovery of a new 125-million-year-old fossil mammal in Spain has pushed back the earliest record of preserved mammalian hair structures and inner organs by more than 60 million years.

The specimen, named Spinolestes xenarthrosus, was fossilized with remarkably intact guard hairs, underfur, tiny hedgehog-like spines and even evidence of a fungal hair infection. The unusually well-preserved fossil also contains an external ear lobe, soft tissues of the liver, lung and diaphragm, and plate-like structures made of keratin known as dermal scutes. The microscopic structures of hair and spines in Spinolestes are the earliest-known examples in mammalian evolutionary history.

The findings are described by scientists from the Autonomous University of Madrid, University of Bonn and the University of Chicago in a study published in Nature on Oct. 15.

"Spinolestes is a spectacular find. It is stunning to see almost perfectly preserved skin and hair structures fossilized in microscopic detail in such an old fossil," said study co-author Zhe-Xi Luo, PhD, professor of organismal biology and anatomy at the University of Chicago. "This Cretaceous furball displays the entire structural diversity of modern mammalian skin and hairs."

The Las Hoyas Quarry in east-central Spain was once a lush wetland with a thriving diversity of life around 125 million years ago during the early Cretaceous period. Spanish paleontologists have studied the site since 1985 and found hundreds of fossils, including important birds and dinosaurs. In 2011, the first mammal fossil at the site was discovered by a team led by Angela D. Buscalioni, PhD, professor of paleontology at the Autonomous University of Madrid, who partnered with collaborators including Luo and Thomas Martin, PhD, professor of paleontology at the University of Bonn, to study the rare specimen.

Living reconstruction of the prehistoric mammal Spinolestes in the Cretaceous-period Las Hoyas wetland. Credit: Oscar Sanisidro. With permission of Nature Publishing Group

==================================================================================================================

Cretaceous furball

Spinolestes xenarthrosus lived in the Cretaceous period and belonged to an extinct lineage of early mammals known as triconodonts. The specimen measured roughly 24 cm in length and is estimated to have weighed around 50 to 70 grams, about the size of a modern-day juvenile rat. Its teeth and skeletal features indicate it was a ground-dweller that ate insects. Its soft tissues, with discernable microscopic structures, were preserved through a rare process known as phosphatic fossilization. Individual hair follicles and bulbs, as well as the composition of individual hair shafts, could be identified using an electron scanning microscope.

Spinolestes had remarkably modern mammalian hair and skin structures, such as compound follicles in which multiple hairs emerge from the same pore. It had small spines around a tenth of a millimeter in diameter on its back, similar to modern hedgehogs and African spiny mice, which appeared to be formed by the fusion of filaments at follicles during development. The team even found abnormally truncated hairs that are evidence of a fungal skin infection known as dermatophytosis, which is widely seen among living mammals.

"Hairs and hair-related integumentary structures are fundamental to the livelihood of mammals, and this fossil shows that an ancestral, long-extinct lineage had grown these structures in exactly the same way that modern mammals do," Luo said. "Spinolestes gives us a spectacular revelation about this central aspect of mammalian biology."

Living reconstruction of the Cretaceous mammal Spinolestes xenarthrosus. Credit: Oscar Sanisidro. With permission of Nature Publishing Group

===============================================================================================================

Spinolestes is also the first example of a Mesozoic mammal in which soft tissues in the thoracic and abdominal cavities are fossilized. The team noted microscopic bronchiole structures of the lung, as well as iron-rich residues associated with the liver. These areas were separated by a curved boundary that is thought to be a muscular diaphragm for respiration. This represents the earliest-known record of mammalian organ systems.

The fossil of Spinolestes contains a large external ear, the earliest-known example in the mammalian fossil record, as well as dermal scutes—plate-like structures made of skin keratin. A more developed form of scutes can be seen in modern armadillos and pangolins.

Spinolestes had extra articulations between vertebrae, which strengthened its spinal column—modern-day mammals such as armored shrews and armadillos possess similar articulations. The authors speculate that this might provide a clue as to the lifestyle of Spinolestes. Armored shrews, for example, use their exceptional vertebral strength to push apart logs or dead palm leaves to feed on insects within.

"With the complex structural features and variation identified in this fossil, we now have conclusive evidence that many fundamental mammalian characteristics were already well-established some 125 million years, in the age of dinosaurs," Luo said.

Explore further: New proto-mammal fossil sheds light on evolution of earliest mammals (w/ Video)

More information: Thomas Martin et al. A Cretaceous eutriconodont and integument evolution in early mammals, Nature (2015). DOI: 10.1038/nature14905

Journal reference: Nature


TOPICS: Education; History; Pets/Animals; Science
KEYWORDS: catastrophism; cretaceous; dinosaur; fossil; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; mammal; paleontology; spinolestes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: stars & stripes forever

Probably till Jesus returns............................


21 posted on 10/20/2015 1:51:14 PM PDT by Red Badger (READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

“Looks like a rat.”

Tastes like chicken!


22 posted on 10/20/2015 1:55:41 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra (Don't touch that thing Don't let anybody touch that thing!I'm a Doctor and I won't touch that thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

That’s my thought.
Basically, a New York city rat.


23 posted on 10/20/2015 2:01:51 PM PDT by djf ("It's not about being nice, it's about being competent!" - Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger; GodGunsGuts; Fichori; tpanther; Gordon Greene; Ethan Clive Osgoode; betty boop; ...

ping


24 posted on 10/20/2015 2:06:08 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
"With the complex structural features and variation identified in this fossil, we now have conclusive evidence that many fundamental mammalian characteristics were already well-established some 125 million years, in the age of dinosaurs," Luo said.

Who would have thought?

25 posted on 10/20/2015 2:09:03 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The GOPe is paying particular attention to this development.


26 posted on 10/20/2015 3:23:37 PM PDT by SgtHooper (Anyone who remembers the 60's, wasn't there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightOnTheBorder

there was an error in your post

you used the term evolutionist when you should have used scientist


27 posted on 10/20/2015 4:16:05 PM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ....carson is the kinder gentler trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Bernie Sanders in his youth!

28 posted on 10/20/2015 7:10:25 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightOnTheBorder; Red Badger; SunkenCiv; All

Evolutionists did not hold that there could not be evidence that was 60 million years older, they merely did not have evidence that this was true. Now they do have the evidence and they are very pleased. However, the earlier mammalian types are almost 100 million years older than this creature, so who knows exactly when these particular attributes first evolved. More evidence needs to be found.


29 posted on 10/21/2015 12:48:41 AM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

I see the resemblance!...............


30 posted on 10/21/2015 6:30:03 AM PDT by Red Badger (READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Marko413

Perhaps mammals and reptiles were concurrent adaptations to different niches in the environment..................


31 posted on 10/21/2015 6:31:53 AM PDT by Red Badger (READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

It means that the fossil record supports a violently turbulent flood sedimentation chronology, with high speed long range transport of sand, gravel and boulders, causing the sudden death and burial of billions of creatures, with VERY uneven deaths occurring up and down the rock column -- -- not a gradualistic, millions of years, slower-than-molasses process.

32 posted on 10/21/2015 8:30:14 AM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
It means that the fossil record supports a violently turbulent flood sedimentation chronology, with high speed long range transport of sand, gravel and boulders, causing the sudden death and burial of billions of creatures, with VERY uneven deaths occurring up and down the rock column -- -- not a gradualistic, millions of years, slower-than-molasses process.

And a curiously selective sudden death and burial, killing all of certain species rendering them extinct, while leaving no evidence of having killed any members of other species.

33 posted on 10/21/2015 8:37:54 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: metmom
What is your conclusion?

Thanks for the many BEEPs!

34 posted on 10/22/2015 11:51:04 AM PDT by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson